Ogoh Shigehiko, Watanabe Hironori, Saito Shotaro, Fisher James P, Iwamoto Erika
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Toyo University, Kawagoe 350-8585, Japan.
Neurovascular Research Laboratory, University of South Wales, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, UK.
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 22;12(6):2441. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062441.
The present study aimed to examine the validity of a novel method to assess cerebrovascular carbon dioxide (CO) reactivity (CVR) that does not require a CO inhalation challenge, e.g., for use in patients with respiratory disease or the elderly, etc. In twenty-one healthy participants, CVR responses to orthostatic stress (50° head-up tilt, HUT) were assessed using two methods: (1) the traditional CO inhalation method, and (2) transfer function analysis (TFA) between middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCA V) and predicted arterial partial pressure of CO (PaCO) during spontaneous respiration. During HUT, MCA V steady-state (i.e., magnitude) and MCA V onset (i.e., time constant) responses to CO inhalation were decreased ( < 0.001) and increased ( = 0.001), respectively, indicative of attenuated CVR. In contrast, TFA gain in the very low-frequency range (VLF, 0.005-0.024 Hz) was unchanged, while the TFA phase in the VLF approached zero during HUT (-0.38 ± 0.59 vs. 0.31 ± 0.78 radians, supine vs. HUT; = 0.003), indicative of a shorter time (i.e., improved) response of CVR. These findings indicate that CVR metrics determined by TFA without a CO inhalation do not track HUT-evoked reductions in CVR identified using CO inhalation, suggesting that enhanced cerebral blood flow response to a change in CO using CO inhalation is necessary to assess CVR adequately.
本研究旨在检验一种评估脑血管二氧化碳(CO)反应性(CVR)的新方法的有效性,该方法无需进行CO吸入激发试验,例如可用于患有呼吸系统疾病的患者或老年人等。在21名健康参与者中,使用两种方法评估了CVR对直立位应激(头抬高50°,HUT)的反应:(1)传统的CO吸入法,以及(2)在自主呼吸期间,大脑中动脉血流速度(MCA V)与预测的动脉血CO分压(PaCO)之间的传递函数分析(TFA)。在HUT期间,MCA V对CO吸入的稳态(即幅度)和起始(即时间常数)反应分别降低(<0.001)和增加(=0.001),表明CVR减弱。相比之下,极低频范围(VLF,0.005 - 0.024 Hz)内的TFA增益未改变,而在HUT期间VLF内的TFA相位接近零(仰卧位与HUT时分别为-0.38±0.59 vs. 0.31±0.78弧度;=0.003),表明CVR的反应时间缩短(即改善)。这些发现表明,在不进行CO吸入的情况下通过TFA确定的CVR指标无法追踪使用CO吸入所识别出的HUT诱发的CVR降低情况,这表明使用CO吸入增强对CO变化的脑血流反应对于充分评估CVR是必要的。