Suppr超能文献

自由回忆中的分心控制过程:对记忆表现的利弊

Distraction control processes in free recall: benefits and costs to performance.

作者信息

Marsh John E, Sörqvist Patrik, Hodgetts Helen M, Beaman C Philip, Jones Dylan M

机构信息

School of Psychology.

Department of Building, Energy, and Environmental Engineering, University of Gävle.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Jan;41(1):118-33. doi: 10.1037/a0037779. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

Abstract

How is semantic memory influenced by individual differences under conditions of distraction? This question was addressed by observing how participants recalled visual target words--drawn from a single category--while ignoring spoken distractor words that were members of either the same or a different (single) category. Working memory capacity (WMC) was related to disruption only with synchronous, not asynchronous, presentation, and distraction was greater when the words were presented synchronously. Subsequent experiments found greater negative priming of distractors among individuals with higher WMC, but this may be dependent on targets and distractors being comparable category exemplars. With less dominant category members as distractors, target recall was impaired--relative to control--only among individuals with low WMC. The results highlight the role of cognitive control resources in target-distractor selection and the individual-specific cost implications of such cognitive control.

摘要

在分心条件下,语义记忆如何受到个体差异的影响?通过观察参与者如何回忆视觉目标词(从单一类别中选取),同时忽略作为相同或不同(单一)类别成员的口语干扰词,来解决这个问题。工作记忆容量(WMC)仅与同步呈现而非异步呈现时的干扰相关,并且当词同步呈现时干扰更大。后续实验发现,在WMC较高的个体中,干扰项的负启动效应更大,但这可能取决于目标和干扰项是可比的类别范例。当以不太占主导地位的类别成员作为干扰项时,相对于对照组,只有在WMC较低的个体中目标回忆才会受损。结果突出了认知控制资源在目标-干扰项选择中的作用以及这种认知控制的个体特异性成本影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验