Lutz J, Wuensch K L
Department of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858-4353.
J Gen Psychol. 1989 Oct;116(4):371-84. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1989.9921124.
Phonetic or acoustic characteristics of stimuli in recall studies have consistently been shown to generate more interference over short intervals than semantic characteristics. We performed three experiments to determine whether this characteristic also applied to recognition processes over short intervals. Subjects were shown study lists of eight words and were asked to recognize which of those words recurred on subsequent eight-word lists. Delays varied from 0 to 100 s between study and test, with a rehearsal-preventing task inserted during the delays. Phonetic distractors generated greater interference than semantic distractors at all delay levels, and semantic distractors generated greater interference than random distractors. These distractor-type differences were not present in long-term recognition tasks. The deterioration in performance over time was considerably slower in these recognition experiments than in previous recall studies.
在回忆研究中,刺激的语音或声学特征一直被证明在短时间间隔内比语义特征产生更多干扰。我们进行了三项实验,以确定这一特征是否也适用于短时间间隔内的识别过程。向受试者展示包含八个单词的学习列表,并要求他们识别哪些单词会在随后的八个单词列表中再次出现。学习和测试之间的延迟从0到100秒不等,在延迟期间插入了一项防止复述的任务。在所有延迟水平上,语音干扰物比语义干扰物产生更大的干扰,语义干扰物比随机干扰物产生更大的干扰。这些干扰物类型差异在长期识别任务中不存在。在这些识别实验中,随着时间推移表现的下降比之前的回忆研究要慢得多。