From the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (E.K., E.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St, SE MMC 292, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (J.F.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California at San Francisco and UCSF-Benioff Children's Hospital, San Francisco, Calif (A.J.B.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (J.B.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, Calif (W.B.); Cardiology Associates of East Tennessee, Knoxville, Tenn (J.R.G.); Office of Clinical Affairs, University of Michigan Health System and Red Forest Consulting LLC, Ann Arbor, Mich (J.G.); Proscan International, Cincinnati, Ohio (T.G.); Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis (E.J.); Radiology Associates of Fox Valley, Neenah, Wis (P.L.); Durham Radiology Associates, Durham, NC (J.L.); Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif (F.G.S.); Department of Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.W.); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (B.L.W.); and Department of Quality and Safety, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (D.H.).
Radiology. 2015 Mar;274(3):866-70. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141645. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
Considerable confusion exists among the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging user community as to how to determine whether a patient with a metal implanted device can be safely imaged in an MR imaging unit. Although there has been progress by the device manufacturers in specifying device behavior in a magnetic field, and some MR imaging manufacturers provide maps of the "spatial gradients," there remains significant confusion because of the lack of standardized terminology and reporting guidelines. The American College of Radiology, through its Subcommittee on MR Safety, has proposed standardized terminology that will contribute to greater safety and understanding for screening metal implants and/or devices prior to MR imaging.
在磁共振成像（MR）成像用户群体中，对于如何确定植入金属设备的患者是否可以在 MR 成像设备中安全成像，存在相当大的混淆。尽管设备制造商在指定设备在磁场中的行为方面取得了进展，并且一些 MR 成像制造商提供了“空间梯度”图，但由于缺乏标准化术语和报告指南，仍然存在很大的混淆。美国放射学院通过其磁共振安全小组委员会，提出了标准化术语，这将有助于在进行 MR 成像之前对金属植入物和/或设备进行筛查，从而提高安全性和理解度。
