• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专业技能和责任感对飞行员在模拟器中对驾驶舱警报反应的影响。

Expertise and responsibility effects on pilots' reactions to flight deck alerts in a simulator.

作者信息

Zheng Yiyuan, Lu Yanyu, Yang Zheng, Fu Shan

机构信息

School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Aviat Space Environ Med. 2014 Nov;85(11):1100-5. doi: 10.3357/ASEM.4078.2014.

DOI:10.3357/ASEM.4078.2014
PMID:25329942
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Flight deck alerts provide system malfunction information designed to lead corresponding pilot reactions aimed at guaranteeing flight safety. This study examined the roles of expertise and flight responsibility and their relationship to pilots' reactions to flight deck alerts.

METHODS

There were 17 pilots composing 12 flight crews that were assigned into pairs according to flight hours and responsibilities. The experiment included 9 flight scenarios and was carried out in a CRJ-200 flight simulator. Pilot performance was recorded by a wide angle video camera, and four kinds of reactions to alerts were defined for analysis.

RESULTS

Pilots tended to have immediate reactions to uninterrupted cautions, with a turning off rate as high as 75%. However, this rate decreased sharply when pilots encountered interrupted cautions and warnings; they also exhibited many wrong reactions to warnings. Pilots with more expertise had more reactions to uninterrupted cautions than those with less expertise, both as pilot flying and pilot monitoring. Meanwhile, the pilot monitoring, regardless of level of expertise, exhibited more reactions than the pilot flying. In addition, more experienced pilots were more likely to have wrong reactions to warnings while acting as the monitoring pilot.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that both expertise and flight responsibility influence pilots' reactions to alerts. Considering crew pairing strategy, when a pilot flying is a less experienced pilot, a more experience pilot is suggested to be the monitoring pilot. The results of this study have implications for understanding pilots' behaviors to flight deck alerts, calling for specialized training and design of approach alarms on the flight deck.

摘要

引言

驾驶舱警报提供系统故障信息,旨在引导相应的飞行员反应,以确保飞行安全。本研究考察了专业知识和飞行职责的作用及其与飞行员对驾驶舱警报反应的关系。

方法

有17名飞行员组成12个飞行机组,根据飞行小时数和职责配对。实验包括9个飞行场景,在一架CRJ - 200飞行模拟器中进行。通过广角摄像机记录飞行员的表现,并定义了对警报的四种反应进行分析。

结果

飞行员往往对不间断的警示立即做出反应,关闭率高达75%。然而,当飞行员遇到间断的警示和警告时,这个比率急剧下降;他们对警告也表现出许多错误反应。作为飞行驾驶员和监控驾驶员,专业知识更多的飞行员对不间断警示的反应比专业知识较少的飞行员更多。同时,无论专业水平如何,监控驾驶员比飞行驾驶员表现出更多的反应。此外,经验更丰富的飞行员在担任监控驾驶员时对警告更有可能做出错误反应。

结论

这些结果表明,专业知识和飞行职责都会影响飞行员对警报的反应。考虑机组配对策略,当飞行驾驶员是经验较少的飞行员时,建议经验更丰富的飞行员担任监控驾驶员。本研究结果对于理解飞行员对驾驶舱警报的行为具有启示意义,呼吁对驾驶舱进近警报进行专门培训和设计。

相似文献

1
Expertise and responsibility effects on pilots' reactions to flight deck alerts in a simulator.专业技能和责任感对飞行员在模拟器中对驾驶舱警报反应的影响。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2014 Nov;85(11):1100-5. doi: 10.3357/ASEM.4078.2014.
2
Pilots' monitoring strategies and performance on automated flight decks: an empirical study combining behavioral and eye-tracking data.飞行员在自动化飞行甲板上的监测策略与表现:一项结合行为和眼动追踪数据的实证研究。
Hum Factors. 2007 Jun;49(3):347-57. doi: 10.1518/001872007X196685.
3
Concurrent Pilot Instrument Monitoring in the Automated Multi-Crew Airline Cockpit.自动化多机组航空公司驾驶舱中的同步试点仪表监控
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017 Dec 1;88(12):1100-1106. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4882.2017.
4
Pilots' Reactions to Different Types of Alerts When Using Head-Up Displays.飞行员在使用抬头显示器时对不同类型警报的反应。
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024 Sep 1;95(9):688-694. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.6392.2024.
5
The relationship between manual handling performance and recent flying experience in air transport pilots.航空运输飞行员的手工操作表现与近期飞行经验之间的关系。
Ergonomics. 2010 Feb;53(2):268-77. doi: 10.1080/00140130903342349.
6
Aircraft control forces and EMG activity: comparison of novice and experienced pilots during simulated take-off and landing.飞机操纵力与肌电图活动:新手与经验丰富的飞行员在模拟起飞和着陆过程中的比较
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999 Aug;70(8):745-51.
7
A Neuroadaptive Cognitive Model for Dealing With Uncertainty in Tracing Pilots' Cognitive State.用于跟踪飞行员认知状态不确定性处理的神经自适应认知模型。
Top Cogn Sci. 2020 Jul;12(3):1012-1029. doi: 10.1111/tops.12515. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
8
Tracing Pilots' Situation Assessment by Neuroadaptive Cognitive Modeling.通过神经自适应认知模型追踪飞行员的态势评估
Front Neurosci. 2020 Aug 11;14:795. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00795. eCollection 2020.
9
The retention of manual flying skills in the automated cockpit.自动飞行驾驶舱中手动飞行技能的保留。
Hum Factors. 2014 Dec;56(8):1506-16. doi: 10.1177/0018720814535628.
10
Assessment of Ocular and Physiological Metrics to Discriminate Flight Phases in Real Light Aircraft.评估眼部和生理指标以区分真实轻型飞机飞行阶段。
Hum Factors. 2018 Nov;60(7):922-935. doi: 10.1177/0018720818787135. Epub 2018 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
When Nurses in an Emergency Situation Look for a Medical Item But Fail to See It.当护士在紧急情况下寻找医疗用品但找不到时。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241279811. doi: 10.1177/00469580241279811.
2
ASPiH Conference 2019 keynote paper. Quality improvement through simulation: a missed opportunity?2019年健康职业教育协会(ASPiH)会议主题论文。通过模拟实现质量改进:一个错失的机会?
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Mar 4;6(4):193-195. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000602. eCollection 2020.