痛风中痛风石的干预措施。
Interventions for tophi in gout.
作者信息
Sriranganathan Melonie K, Vinik Ophir, Bombardier Claire, Edwards Christopher J
机构信息
Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire, UK, SO16 6YD.
出版信息
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 20(10):CD010069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010069.pub2.
BACKGROUND
Tophi develop in untreated or uncontrolled gout. Their presence can lead to severe and potentially fatal complications. To date there have been no systematic reviews focused on the management of tophi in gout.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the benefits and harms of non-surgical and surgical treatments for the management of tophi in gout.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched three databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE. We handsearched American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) abstracts from 2010 to 2011, references from included studies and trial registries. We completed the most recent search on 20 May 2013.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials with quasi-randomised methods of allocating participants to treatment examining interventions for tophi in gout in adults. Possible interventions included urate-lowering pharmacological treatment (e.g. benzbromarone, probenecid, allopurinol, febuxostat, pegloticase), surgical removal or other interventions such as haemodialysis.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors extracted data from titles, abstracts and selected studies for detailed review, and extracted data and risk of bias independently. Major outcomes were number of participants with complete resolution of tophi, number of study participant withdrawals due to adverse events, joint pain reduction, function, quality of life, serum urate normalisation and total adverse events.
MAIN RESULTS
Only one study, at low risk of all biases, met the inclusion criteria. This was the pooled results from two RCTs (225 participants, 145 with tophi at baseline) randomised to one of three arms; pegloticase infusion every two weeks (biweekly), monthly pegloticase infusion (pegloticase infusion alternating with placebo infusion every two weeks) and placebo. Moderate-quality evidence from one study indicated that biweekly pegloticase 8 mg infusion reduced tophi in the subset of participants with tophi, but increased withdrawals due to adverse events in all participants, and monthly infusion appeared to result in less benefit.Biweekly pegloticase treatment resulted in resolution of tophi in 21/52 participants compared with 2/27 who received placebo (risk ratio (RR) 5.45, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.38 to 21.54; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 3 (95% CI 2 to 6).Eleven of 52 participants with monthly pegloticase treatment had complete resolution of one or more tophi compared with 2/27 who received placebo (RR 2.86, 95% CI 0.68 to 11.97).Participant-reported pain relief of 30% or greater, function, quality of life, serum urate normalisation, were reported for all participants but not separately for those with tophi; therefore, we did not include the results.Pegloticase administered biweekly resulted in more withdrawals due to adverse events compared with placebo (15/85 participants with pegloticase versus 1/43 participants with placebo; RR 7.59, 95% CI 1.04 to 55.55; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 7, 95% CI 4 to 17). Pegloticase administered monthly also resulted in more withdrawals due to adverse events than placebo (16/84 participants with pegloticase versus 1/43 participants with placebo; RR 8.19, 95% CI 1.12 to 59.71; NNTH 6, 95% CI 4 to 14). Most withdrawals were due to infusion reactions.Total adverse events were high in all treatment groups: 80/85 participants administered pegloticase biweekly reported an adverse event compared with 41/43 from the placebo group (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.07); 84/84 participants administered pegloticase monthly reported an adverse event versus 41/43 in the placebo group (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.14). As 80% of adverse events were due to flares of gout, probably unrelated to the drug treatment per se, this may explain the high rate of adverse events in the placebo group - who were essentially untreated.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This study showed pegloticase is probably beneficial in the management of tophi in gout, in terms of resolution of tophi, but with a high risk of adverse infusion reactions. However, there is a need for more RCT data considering other interventions, including surgical removal of tophi.
背景
痛风石在未经治疗或控制不佳的痛风患者中出现。其存在可导致严重且可能致命的并发症。迄今为止,尚无针对痛风石管理的系统评价。
目的
评估非手术和手术治疗痛风石的益处和危害。
检索方法
我们检索了三个数据库:Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)。我们手工检索了2010年至2011年美国风湿病学会(ACR)和欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)的摘要、纳入研究的参考文献以及试验注册库。我们于2013年5月20日完成了最新检索。
选择标准
所有已发表的随机对照试验(RCT)或采用准随机方法分配参与者进行治疗的对照临床试验,这些试验研究了成人痛风中痛风石的干预措施。可能的干预措施包括降尿酸药物治疗(如苯溴马隆、丙磺舒、别嘌醇、非布司他、聚乙二醇化尿酸酶)、手术切除或其他干预措施,如血液透析。
数据收集与分析
两位综述作者从标题、摘要和选定的研究中提取数据进行详细审查,并独立提取数据和偏倚风险。主要结局包括痛风石完全消退的参与者数量、因不良事件退出研究的参与者数量、关节疼痛减轻情况、功能、生活质量、血清尿酸正常化以及总不良事件。
主要结果
只有一项所有偏倚风险均较低的研究符合纳入标准。这是两项RCT(225名参与者,145名基线时有痛风石)的汇总结果,随机分为三个组之一:每两周输注一次聚乙二醇化尿酸酶(每两周一次)、每月输注一次聚乙二醇化尿酸酶(每两周一次聚乙二醇化尿酸酶输注与安慰剂输注交替)和安慰剂。一项研究的中等质量证据表明,每两周输注8mg聚乙二醇化尿酸酶可使有痛风石的参与者亚组中的痛风石减少,但所有参与者因不良事件退出的人数增加,每月输注似乎获益较少。每两周一次的聚乙二醇化尿酸酶治疗使52名参与者中的21名痛风石消退,而接受安慰剂的27名参与者中有2名(风险比(RR)5.45,95%置信区间(CI)1.38至21.54;为获得额外有益结局所需治疗的人数(NNTB)3(95%CI 2至6))。每月接受聚乙二醇化尿酸酶治疗的52名参与者中有11名一个或多个痛风石完全消退,而接受安慰剂的27名参与者中有2名(RR 2.86,95%CI 0.68至11.97)。所有参与者均报告了30%或更高的参与者报告的疼痛缓解、功能、生活质量、血清尿酸正常化,但未分别报告有痛风石者的情况;因此,我们未纳入这些结果。与安慰剂相比,每两周一次给予聚乙二醇化尿酸酶导致因不良事件退出的人数更多(接受聚乙二醇化尿酸酶的85名参与者中有15名,接受安慰剂的43名参与者中有1名;RR 7.59,95%CI 1.04至55.55;为获得额外有害结局所需治疗的人数(NNTH)7,95%CI 4至17)。每月给予聚乙二醇化尿酸酶导致因不良事件退出的人数也比安慰剂多(接受聚乙二醇化尿酸酶的84名参与者中有16名,接受安慰剂的43名参与者中有1名;RR 8.19,95%CI 1.12至59.71;NNTH 6,95%CI 4至14)。大多数退出是由于输液反应。所有治疗组的总不良事件发生率都很高:每两周接受一次聚乙二醇化尿酸酶治疗的85名参与者中有80名报告了不良事件,而安慰剂组的43名参与者中有41名(RR 0.99,95%CI 0.91至1.07);每月接受一次聚乙二醇化尿酸酶治疗的84名参与者中有84名报告了不良事件,而安慰剂组的43名参与者中有41名(RR 1.05,95%CI 0.98至1.14)。由于80%的不良事件是由于痛风发作,可能与药物治疗本身无关,这可能解释了安慰剂组(基本上未接受治疗)中不良事件发生率较高的原因。
作者结论
本研究表明,就痛风石消退而言,聚乙二醇化尿酸酶可能对痛风石的管理有益,但存在高风险的不良输液反应。然而,需要更多关于其他干预措施的RCT数据,包括痛风石的手术切除。