Ivana Sestak, Jack Cuzick, Queen Mary University; Mitch Dowsett, Elena Lopez-Knowles, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Martin Filipits, Peter Dubsky, Michael Gnant, Medical University of Vienna; Christian Fesl, Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria; John Wayne Cowens, Sean Ferree, NanoString Technologies, Seattle, WA; and Carl Shaper, MyRAQA, Redwood Shores, CA.
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 10;33(8):916-22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.6894. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
We have previously shown that the PAM50-based risk of recurrence (ROR) score is significantly correlated with distant recurrence in both the translational research cohort within the Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial (TransATAC) and Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group 8 (ABCSG 8) randomized trials. Here, we focus on the ROR score for predicting distant recurrence after 5 years of follow-up in a combined analysis of these two randomized trials.
Long-term follow-up data and tissue samples were obtained from 2,137 postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer from the ABCSG 8 and TransATAC trials. We used Cox proportional hazard regression models to determine the prognostic value of ROR for distant recurrence beyond 5 years in the combined data set.
A total of 2,137 women who did not have a recurrence 5 years after diagnosis were included in the combined analyses. The Clinical Treatment Score (CTS) was the strongest prognostic factor 5 years after diagnosis (univariable: likelihood ratio [LR] χ(2) = 94.12, bivariable: LR χ(2) = 61.43). The ROR score was significantly prognostic by itself in years 5 to 10. In the node-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative subgroup, more prognostic value for late distant recurrence was added by the ROR score compared with the CTS.
The ROR score added clinically meaningful prognostic information to the CTS in all patients and all subgroups in the late follow-up period. These results suggest that the ROR score may be helpful for separating patients into risk groups who could be spared or potentially benefit from extended hormonal therapy beyond 5 years of treatment.
我们之前已经证明,基于 PAM50 的复发风险 (ROR) 评分与 Arimidex、他莫昔芬单药或联合治疗(ATAC)试验(TransATAC)和奥地利乳腺癌和结直肠癌研究组 8(ABCSG 8)随机试验中的远处复发明显相关。在这里,我们专注于这两个随机试验的联合分析中,预测 5 年随访后远处复发的 ROR 评分。
从 ABCSG 8 和 TransATAC 试验中获得了 2137 名激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌绝经后妇女的长期随访数据和组织样本。我们使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型来确定 ROR 在联合数据集中外 5 年远处复发的预后价值。
共有 2137 名诊断后 5 年内无复发的女性被纳入联合分析。临床治疗评分(CTS)是诊断后 5 年最强的预后因素(单变量:似然比 [LR] χ(2) = 94.12,双变量:LR χ(2) = 61.43)。ROR 评分在 5 至 10 年内本身具有显著的预后意义。在淋巴结阴性/人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性亚组中,与 CTS 相比,ROR 评分增加了晚期远处复发的更多预后价值。
在所有患者和所有亚组的晚期随访期间,ROR 评分在 CTS 的基础上增加了有临床意义的预后信息。这些结果表明,ROR 评分可能有助于将患者分为风险组,这些患者可以免于或可能从 5 年以上的延长激素治疗中获益。