Suppr超能文献

开放性及机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后输血的应用及时机

Utilization and timing of blood transfusions following open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Korets Ruslan, Weinberg Aaron C, Alberts Blake D, Woldu Solomon L, Mann Mark J, Badani Ketan K

机构信息

Department of Urology, Columbia University Medical Center , New York, New York.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2014 Dec;28(12):1418-23. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0225.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is associated with a high risk of intraoperative blood loss and subsequent blood transfusions. The shift in surgical technique from open radical prostatectomy (ORP) to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has resulted in lower operative blood loss, and reduced the need for transfusions. We analyzed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) database to compare real-world, contemporary trends in utilization and timing of blood transfusion following ORP and RARP.

METHODS

We identified men undergoing both RARP and ORP and then queried for patients who received a blood transfusion in the perioperative period. The outcomes of interest were need and timing of perioperative blood transfusion (PBT), which was categorized into early (postoperative day [POD] ≤1) or late (POD ≥2). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with the need and timing for PBT.

RESULTS

A total of 16,144 men who underwent RP were identified from 2007 to 2012. The overall PBT rate was 3.1%. Highest rate of transfusions occurred on day of surgery for patients undergoing ORP, and first POD for patients undergoing RARP. On multivariate analysis significant predictors of blood transfusion included history of bleeding disorder (OR: 2.8, p=0.002), preoperative dyspnea (odds ratio [OR]: 1.7, p=0.03), starting hematocrit <42% (OR: 1.9, p<0.001), open approach (OR: 0.09, p<0.001), year of surgery (OR: 0.5, p<0.001), resident involvement (OR: 1.6, p=0.003), and operative time (OR: 4.4, p<0.001). The only predictor of receiving a blood transfusion on POD 2 or later was having the procedure performed through a robot-assisted approach (OR: 3.7, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study we found that the rate of perioperative transfusions is lower than previously published. A clear separation in timing of transfusion exists based on the utilized surgical approach. It is prudent that surgeons performing RARP be aware of the low, but present risk of a delayed blood transfusion.

摘要

引言与目的

根治性前列腺切除术(RP)与术中大量失血及随后输血的高风险相关。手术技术从开放性根治性前列腺切除术(ORP)向机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)的转变已使术中失血量减少,并降低了输血需求。我们分析了美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进项目(ACS - NSQIP)数据库,以比较ORP和RARP术后输血利用情况及时间的真实当代趋势。

方法

我们确定了同时接受RARP和ORP的男性患者,然后查询围手术期接受输血的患者。感兴趣的结果是围手术期输血(PBT)的需求和时间,分为早期(术后第[POD]≤1天)或晚期(POD≥2天)。采用逻辑回归分析确定与PBT需求和时间相关的变量。

结果

2007年至2012年共确定了16144例接受RP的男性患者。总体PBT率为3.1%。接受ORP的患者输血率最高发生在手术当天,接受RARP的患者则在术后第1天。多因素分析显示,输血的显著预测因素包括出血性疾病史(比值比[OR]:2.8,p = 0.002)、术前呼吸困难(OR:1.7,p = 0.03)、起始血细胞比容<42%(OR:1.9,p < 0.001)、开放手术方式(OR:0.09,p < 0.001)、手术年份(OR:0.5,p < 0.001)、住院医生参与(OR:1.6,p = 0.003)以及手术时间(OR:4.4,p < 0.001)。术后第2天或更晚接受输血的唯一预测因素是通过机器人辅助方式进行手术(OR:3.7,p < 0.001)。

结论

在本研究中,我们发现围手术期输血率低于先前公布的数据。根据所采用的手术方式,输血时间存在明显差异。实施RARP的外科医生应谨慎意识到延迟输血的风险虽低但仍存在。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验