Bhopal Raj S, Cezard Genevieve, Bansal Narinder, Ward Hester J T, Bhala Neeraj
Edinburgh Ethnicity and Health Research Group (EEHRG), Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Wort's Causeway, Cambridge, UK.
BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 21;4(10):e006120. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006120.
Our objective was to augment the limited evidence mainly from local, clinical studies of ethnic differences in gastrointestinal disorders. Our question was: are there ethnic variations in hospitalisation/death for lower gastrointestinal disorders in Scotland?
Scotland.
This retrospective-cohort linked 4.65 (of 4.9) million people in the 2001 census of Scotland (providing data on ethnicity, country of birth and indicators of socioeconomic deprivation) to 9 years of National Health Service hospitalisation and death records.
For appendicitis, we studied all ages; for irritable bowel syndrome, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease and diverticular disease, we included those ≥20 years. Using Poisson regression (robust variance) we calculated, by ethnic group and sex, first-hospitalisation/death age-adjusted rates per 100,000 person-years, and relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs multiplied by 100, so the White Scottish reference population had an RR=100.
There were ethnic variations; for example, for irritable bowel syndrome, RRs (95% CIs) were comparatively high in Other White British women (128.4 (111.0 to 148.6)), and low in Pakistani women (75.1 (60.6 to 93.1)). For appendicitis, RRs were high in men in Other White British (145.2 (127.8 to 164.9)), and low in most non-White groups, for example, Pakistanis (73.8 (56.9 to 95.6)). For ulcerative colitis, RRs were high in Indian (169.8 (109.7 to 262.7)) and Pakistani (160.8 (104.2 to 248.2)) men. For Crohn's disease, the RR was high in Pakistani men (209.2 (149.6 to 292.6)). For diverticular disease, RRs were high in Irish men (176.0 (156.9 to 197.5)), and any Mixed background women (144.6 (107.4 to 194.8)), and low in most non-White groups, for example, Chinese men (47.1 (31.0 to 71.6) and women (46.0 (30.4 to 69.8)).
Appendicitis and diverticular disease were comparatively low in most non-White groups, while ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease were mostly higher in South Asians. Describing and understanding such patterns may help clinical practice and research internationally.
我们的目标是补充主要来自本地关于胃肠道疾病种族差异的临床研究的有限证据。我们的问题是:在苏格兰,下消化道疾病的住院/死亡率是否存在种族差异?
苏格兰。
这项回顾性队列研究将2001年苏格兰人口普查中的465万(共490万)人(提供种族、出生国家和社会经济剥夺指标的数据)与9年的国民健康服务住院和死亡记录相联系。
对于阑尾炎,我们研究了所有年龄段;对于肠易激综合征、溃疡性结肠炎、克罗恩病和憩室病,我们纳入了年龄≥20岁的人群。使用泊松回归(稳健方差),我们按种族和性别计算了每10万人年的首次住院/死亡年龄调整率,以及95%置信区间乘以100后的相对风险(RRs),因此以苏格兰白人作为参照人群时RR = 100。
存在种族差异;例如,对于肠易激综合征,其他英国白人女性的RRs(95%置信区间)相对较高(128.4(111.0至148.6)),而巴基斯坦女性的RRs较低(75.1(60.6至93.1))。对于阑尾炎,其他英国白人男性的RRs较高(145.2(127.8至164.9)),而大多数非白人组的RRs较低,例如巴基斯坦人(73.8(56.9至95.6))。对于溃疡性结肠炎,印度男性(169.8(109.7至262.7))和巴基斯坦男性(160.8(104.2至248.2))的RRs较高。对于克罗恩病,巴基斯坦男性的RR较高(209.2(149.6至292.6))。对于憩室病,爱尔兰男性(176.0(156.9至197.5))和任何混合背景女性(144.6(107.4至194.8))的RRs较高,而大多数非白人组的RRs较低,例如中国男性(47.1(31.0至71.6))和女性(46.0(30.4至69.8))。
大多数非白人组的阑尾炎和憩室病发病率相对较低,而溃疡性结肠炎和克罗恩病在南亚人中大多较高。描述和理解这些模式可能有助于国际临床实践和研究。