Dennis S Connor, Berkland Cory J, Bonewald Lynda F, Detamore Michael S
1Bioengineering Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
2Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Department, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2015 Jun;21(3):247-66. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2014.0419. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
Autologous bone grafting (ABG) remains entrenched as the gold standard of treatment in bone regenerative surgery. Consequently, many marginally successful bone tissue engineering strategies have focused on mimicking portions of ABG's "ideal" osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic composition resembling the late reparative stage extracellular matrix (ECM) in bone fracture repair, also known as the "hard" or "bony" callus. An alternative, less common approach that has emerged in the last decade harnesses endochondral (EC) ossification through developmental engineering principles, which acknowledges that the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in developmental skeletogenesis, specifically EC ossification, are closely paralleled during native bone healing. EC ossification naturally occurs during the majority of bone fractures and, thus, can potentially be utilized to enhance bone regeneration for nearly any orthopedic indication, especially in avascular critical-sized defects where hypoxic conditions favor initial chondrogenesis instead of direct intramembranous ossification. The body's native EC ossification response, however, is not capable of regenerating critical-sized defects without intervention. We propose that an underexplored potential exists to regenerate bone through the native EC ossification response by utilizing strategies which mimic the initial inflammatory or fibrocartilaginous ECM (i.e., "pro-" or "soft" callus) observed in the early reparative stage of bone fracture repair. To date, the majority of strategies utilizing this approach rely on clinically burdensome in vitro cell expansion protocols. This review will focus on the confluence of two evolving areas, (1) native ECM biomaterials and (2) developmental engineering, which will attempt to overcome the technical, business, and regulatory challenges that persist in the area of bone regeneration. Significant attention will be given to native "raw" materials and ECM-based designs that provide necessary osteo- and chondro-conductive and inductive features for enhancing EC ossification. In addition, critical perspectives on existing stem cell-based therapeutic strategies will be discussed with a focus on their use as an extension of the acellular ECM-based designs for specific clinical indications. Within this framework, a novel realm of unexplored design strategies for bone tissue engineering will be introduced into the collective consciousness of the regenerative medicine field.
自体骨移植(ABG)仍然是骨再生手术治疗的金标准。因此,许多不太成功的骨组织工程策略都集中在模仿ABG的部分“理想”骨传导、骨诱导和成骨成分,这些成分类似于骨折修复后期修复阶段的细胞外基质(ECM),也称为“硬”或“骨”痂。在过去十年中出现的另一种不太常见的方法是通过发育工程原理利用软骨内(EC)骨化,该原理承认参与发育性骨骼生成(特别是EC骨化)的分子和细胞机制在天然骨愈合过程中密切平行。EC骨化在大多数骨折中自然发生,因此有可能用于增强几乎任何骨科适应症的骨再生,特别是在缺氧条件有利于初始软骨形成而不是直接膜内骨化的无血管临界尺寸缺损中。然而,人体天然的EC骨化反应在没有干预的情况下无法再生临界尺寸缺损。我们提出,通过利用模仿骨折修复早期修复阶段观察到的初始炎症或纤维软骨ECM(即“前”或“软”痂)的策略,通过天然EC骨化反应再生骨的潜力尚未得到充分探索。迄今为止,大多数采用这种方法的策略都依赖于临床上繁琐的体外细胞扩增方案。本综述将重点关注两个不断发展的领域的融合,(1)天然ECM生物材料和(2)发育工程,这将试图克服骨再生领域持续存在的技术、商业和监管挑战。将重点关注天然“原材料”和基于ECM的设计,这些设计提供增强EC骨化所需的骨传导和软骨传导以及诱导特性。此外,将讨论现有基于干细胞的治疗策略的关键观点,重点是它们作为基于无细胞ECM的设计的扩展用于特定临床适应症的用途。在此框架内,将把骨组织工程未探索的设计策略的新领域引入再生医学领域的集体意识中。