Sinha Rajeev, Yadav Albel S
Department of Surgery, Maharani Laxmibai Medical College, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
J Minim Access Surg. 2014 Oct;10(4):175-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.141502.
The feasibility of the single incision, multiport transumbilical approach(SILC) for the treatment of symptomatic gallbladder calculus disease has been established.
The study examines both short and long term morbidity of the SILC approach.
All the 1338 patients were operated by the same surgeon through a transversely placed umbilical incision in the upper third of the umbilicus. Three conventional ports,10,5 and 5 mm were introduced through the same skin incision but through separate transfascial punctures. The instruments were those used for standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy(SLC).Patients with acute cholecystitis and calculous pancreatitis were included,while those with choledocholithiasis were excluded. Results were compared with those of SLC.
Forty patients had difficult gall bladders, 214 had acute cholecystitis, and 16 had calculous pancreatitis. The mean operating time was 24.7 mins as compared to 18.4 mins in SLC. Intracorporeal knotting was required in four patients. Conversion to SLC was required in 12 patients. Morrisons pouch drain was left in 3 patients. Injectable analgesics were required in 85% vs 90% (SILC vs SLC) on day 1 and 25% vs 45% on day 2 and infection was seen in 6(0. 45%) patients. Port site hernia was seen in 2 patients. The data was compared with that of SLC and significance calculated by the student 't' test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered as significant.
Trans umbilical SILC gives comparable results to SLC, and is a superior alternative when cosmesis and postoperative pain are considered, but the operative time is significantly more.
单切口多端口经脐入路(SILC)治疗有症状胆囊结石病的可行性已得到证实。
本研究探讨SILC入路的短期和长期发病率。
1338例患者均由同一位外科医生通过在脐上三分之一处横向放置的脐部切口进行手术。通过同一皮肤切口但经不同的筋膜穿刺引入三个常规端口,分别为10mm、5mm和5mm。使用的器械为标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SLC)所用器械。纳入急性胆囊炎和结石性胰腺炎患者,排除胆总管结石患者。将结果与SLC的结果进行比较。
40例患者胆囊情况复杂,214例患有急性胆囊炎,16例患有结石性胰腺炎。平均手术时间为24.7分钟,而SLC为18.4分钟。4例患者需要进行体内打结。12例患者需要转为SLC。3例患者留置了莫里森隐窝引流管。第1天85%的患者需要注射镇痛药,而SLC为90%;第2天25%的患者需要,SLC为45%;6例(0.45%)患者出现感染。2例患者出现端口部位疝。将数据与SLC的数据进行比较,并通过学生t检验计算显著性。p值小于0.05被认为具有显著性。
经脐SILC与SLC的结果相当,在考虑美观和术后疼痛时是一种更好的选择,但手术时间明显更长。