Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University Hospital, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Center of Excellence in Applied Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University Hospital, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Surg Endosc. 2019 May;33(5):1578-1584. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6447-y. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
Transumbilical incision has been applied in single-incision laparoscopy. Evidence for the effect of transumbilical incision on postoperative pain compared with infraumbilical incision is still lacking.
A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in a university hospital. Patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to have transumbilical or infraumbilical incision. Postoperative pain was measured using visual analog score at 6, 24 h, and 7 days post operation. Secondary outcomes were analgesic usage, length of stay, superficial surgical site infection (SSI), wound numbness, and hypersensitivity. Risk ratio and mean difference (MD) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Adjusted analysis was done, if clinical unbalanced characteristics presented. The study was registered at http://ClinicalTrial.gov (ID NCT02738710).
A total of 102 patients were enrolled in which 51 patients were randomized to each interventional group. Postoperative pain was not significantly different between the groups with the MD of - 0.07 (95% CI - 0.47, 0.35). Paracetamol usage was significantly 1 tab (95% CI - 1.9, - 0.1) less after transumbilical incision, but this was not significant after adjusting for unbalanced characteristics. Superficial SSI rate was much higher in the transumbilical than the infraumbilical group, i.e., 16 versus 4%, but this was not significant (p = 0.070). Satisfaction scores at 3 months were not different between the groups, with the corresponding means of 8.9 [standard deviation (SD) 1.3] and 9.0 (SD 1.0).
Transumbilical incision had non-significant different pain compared to infraumbilical incision. Most patients in both groups were satisfied with the operation at 3 months. A further large RCT is required for comparing SSI between the two incisions.
经脐切口已应用于单孔腹腔镜手术。与脐下切口相比,经脐切口对术后疼痛影响的证据仍然缺乏。
在一所大学医院进行了一项随机对照试验(RCT)。接受常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者被随机分为经脐或脐下切口组。术后疼痛采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)在术后 6、24 小时和 7 天进行测量。次要结局指标为镇痛药物使用、住院时间、浅表手术部位感染(SSI)、切口麻木和过敏。采用风险比(RR)和均数差值(MD)及其 95%置信区间(CI)进行估计。如果临床存在不均衡特征,则进行调整分析。该研究在 http://ClinicalTrial.gov 注册(ID NCT02738710)。
共纳入 102 例患者,其中 51 例患者随机分配至各干预组。两组术后疼痛无显著差异,MD 为-0.07(95%CI-0.47,0.35)。经脐切口组术后使用扑热息痛 1 片(95%CI-1.9,-0.1)显著减少,但在调整不均衡特征后无统计学意义。经脐组浅表 SSI 发生率明显高于脐下组,分别为 16%和 4%,但差异无统计学意义(p=0.070)。3 个月时两组患者满意度评分无差异,分别为 8.9(标准差[SD]1.3)和 9.0(SD1.0)。
与脐下切口相比,经脐切口的疼痛无显著差异。两组患者大多数在 3 个月时对手术满意。需要进一步的大 RCT 来比较两种切口的 SSI 发生率。