Alpay Levent, Lacin Tunc, Teker Dilek, Okur Erdal, Baysungur Volkan, Kanbur Serda, Misirlioglu Aysun Kosif, Sonmez Hakan, Yalcinkaya Irfan, Kiyak Mithat
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sureyyapasa Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2014 Sep;9(3):409-14. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2014.44254. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
Cost analysis studies performed in western countries report that the overall cost of lobectomies performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery is similar to or less than those performed via thoracotomy. The situation may be different in a developing country.
We evaluated the cost differences of these two surgical methods.
We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of 81 patients who underwent lobectomy either via video-assisted thoracic surgery (n = 32) or via thoracotomy (n = 49). Patient characteristics, pathology, perioperative complications, additional surgical procedures, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, and outcomes of both groups were recorded. Detailed cost data for medications, anesthesia, laboratory, surgical instruments, disposable instruments and surgery cost itself were also documented. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the groups.
The two groups were homogeneous in regard to age, sex, pathology and perioperative morbidity. The mean duration of hospitalization in the video-assisted thoracic surgery group was significantly shorter than that of the thoracotomy group (7.78 ±5.11 days vs. 10.65 ±6.57 days, p < 0.05). Overall final mean cost in the video-assisted thoracic surgery group was significantly higher than that of the thoracotomy group ($3970 ±1873 vs. $3083 ±1013, p = 0.002). This significant difference relies mostly on the cost of disposable surgical instruments, which were used much more in the video-assisted thoracic surgery group than the thoracotomy group ($2252 ±1856 vs. $427 ±47, p < 0.05).
In contrast to western countries, a video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy may cost more than a lobectomy via thoracotomy in a developing country. More expensive disposable surgical instruments and cheaper hospital stay charges lead to higher overall costs in video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy patients.
西方国家进行的成本分析研究报告称,通过电视辅助胸腔镜手术进行肺叶切除术的总体成本与开胸手术相似或更低。在发展中国家,情况可能有所不同。
我们评估了这两种手术方法的成本差异。
我们回顾性分析了81例行肺叶切除术患者的医院记录,其中32例通过电视辅助胸腔镜手术,49例通过开胸手术。记录了患者的特征、病理、围手术期并发症、额外的手术操作、住院时间和重症监护病房停留时间以及两组的结果。还记录了药物、麻醉、实验室检查、手术器械、一次性器械和手术本身的详细成本数据。进行统计分析以比较两组。
两组在年龄、性别、病理和围手术期发病率方面具有同质性。电视辅助胸腔镜手术组的平均住院时间明显短于开胸手术组(7.78±5.11天对10.65±6.57天,p<0.05)。电视辅助胸腔镜手术组的总体最终平均成本明显高于开胸手术组(3970±1873美元对3083±1013美元,p=0.002)。这一显著差异主要取决于一次性手术器械的成本,电视辅助胸腔镜手术组使用的一次性手术器械比开胸手术组多得多(2252±1856美元对427±47美元,p<0.05)。
与西方国家不同,在发展中国家,电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术的成本可能高于开胸肺叶切除术。更昂贵的一次性手术器械和更便宜的住院费用导致电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术患者的总体成本更高。