Ghanizadeh Ahmad, Safavi Salar, Berk Michael
Research Center for Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Hafez Hospital, Shiraz, Iran ; Department of Psychiatry, Hafez Hospital, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran ; Department of Neurosciences, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Basic Clin Neurosci. 2013 Winter;4(1):50-6.
The utility and discriminatory pattern of the clock face drawing test in ADHD is unclear. This study therefore compared Clock Face Drawing test performance in children with ADHD and controls.
95 school children with ADHD and 191 other children were matched for gender ratio and age. ADHD symptoms severities were assessed using DSM-IV ADHD checklist and their intellectual functioning was assessed. The participants completed three clock-drawing tasks, and the following four functions were assessed: Contour score, Numbers score, Hands setting score, and Center score.
All the subscales scores of the three clock drawing tests of the ADHD group were lower than that of the control group. In ADHD children, inattention and hyperactivity/ impulsivity scores were not related to free drawn clock test scores. When pre-drawn contour test was performed, inattentiveness score was statistically associated with Number score while none of the other variables of age, gender, intellectual functioning, and hand use preference were associated with that kind of score. In pre-drawn clock, no association of ADHD symptoms with any CDT subscales found significant. In addition, more errors are observed with free drawn clock and Pre-drawn contour than pre-drawn clock.
Putting Numbers and Hands setting are more sensitive measures to screen ADHD than Contour and Center drawing. Test performance, except Hands setting, may have already reached a developmental plateau. It is probable that Hand setting deficit in children with ADHD may not decrease from age 8 to 14 years. Performance of children with ADHD is associated with complexity of CDT.
注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)中钟面绘画测试的效用和区分模式尚不清楚。因此,本研究比较了ADHD儿童和对照组儿童在钟面绘画测试中的表现。
95名患有ADHD的学童和191名其他儿童按性别比例和年龄进行匹配。使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)ADHD清单评估ADHD症状严重程度,并评估他们的智力功能。参与者完成了三项钟面绘画任务,并评估了以下四项功能:轮廓得分、数字得分、指针设置得分和中心得分。
ADHD组三项钟面绘画测试的所有子量表得分均低于对照组。在ADHD儿童中,注意力不集中和多动/冲动得分与自由绘制钟面测试得分无关。当进行预先绘制轮廓测试时,注意力不集中得分与数字得分在统计学上相关,而年龄、性别、智力功能和手部使用偏好等其他变量均与该类得分无关。在预先绘制的钟面测试中,未发现ADHD症状与任何CDT子量表有显著关联。此外,与预先绘制的钟面相比,自由绘制钟面和预先绘制轮廓时观察到更多错误。
放置数字和指针设置比轮廓和中心绘制更能敏感地筛查ADHD。除指针设置外,测试表现可能已达到发育平台期。ADHD儿童的指针设置缺陷可能在8至14岁之间不会减少。ADHD儿童的表现与CDT的复杂性有关。