Henrique-Araújo Ricardo, Osório Flávia L, Gonçalves Ribeiro Mônica, Soares Monteiro Ivandro, Williams Janet B W, Kalali Amir, Alexandre Crippa José, Oliveira Irismar Reis De
Dr. Henrique-Araújo is from the Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, and Nova Esperança Medical School, João Pessoa, Brazil; Dr. Osório is from the Department of Neuroscience and Behavior, State University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, and the National Institute of Science and Technology (INCT) for Translational Medicine, Brazil; Dr. Ribeiro is from Sanatório São Paulo, Salvador, Brazil; Dr. Monteiro is from Orasi Institute, Porto, Portugal; Dr. Williams is from MedAvante Inc. and is a Professor Emerita at Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; Dr. Kalali is from Quintiles Inc., and the University of California, San Diego, California, USA; Dr. Crippa is from the Department of Neuroscience and Behavior, State University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil, and the National Institute of Science and Technology (INCT) for Translational Medicine, Brazil; Dr. de Oliveira is from the Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health and the Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, and Sanatório São Paulo, Salvador, Brazil.
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2014 Jul;11(7-8):10-8.
GRID-HAMD is a semi-structured interview guide developed to overcome flaws in HAM-D, and has been incorporated into an increasing number of studies.
Carry out the transcultural adaptation of GRID-HAMD into the Brazilian Portuguese language, evaluate the inter-rater reliability of this instrument and the training impact upon this measure, and verify the raters' opinions of said instrument.
The transcultural adaptation was conducted by appropriate methodology. The measurement of inter-rater reliability was done by way of videos that were evaluated by 85 professionals before and after training for the use of this instrument.
The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) remained between 0.76 and 0.90 for GRID-HAMD-21 and between 0.72 and 0.91 for GRID-HAMD-17. The training did not have an impact on the ICC, except for a few groups of participants with a lower level of experience. Most of the participants showed high acceptance of GRID-HAMD, when compared to other versions of HAM-D.
The scale presented adequate inter-rater reliability even before training began. Training did not have an impact on this measure, except for a few groups with less experience. GRID-HAMD received favorable opinions from most of the participants.
GRID-HAMD是为克服汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)的缺陷而开发的半结构化访谈指南,已被纳入越来越多的研究中。
将GRID-HAMD跨文化改编为巴西葡萄牙语,评估该工具的评分者间信度以及培训对该测量方法的影响,并验证评分者对该工具的看法。
采用适当方法进行跨文化改编。通过视频测量评分者间信度,85名专业人员在接受使用该工具的培训前后对视频进行评估。
GRID-HAMD-21的组内相关系数(ICC)保持在0.76至0.90之间,GRID-HAMD-17的ICC保持在0.72至0.91之间。培训对ICC没有影响,除了少数经验水平较低的参与者组。与HAM-D的其他版本相比,大多数参与者对GRID-HAMD表现出高度认可。
即使在培训开始前,该量表也表现出足够的评分者间信度。培训对该测量方法没有影响,除了少数经验较少的组。GRID-HAMD得到了大多数参与者的好评。