Shields Edward, Kates Stephen L
University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood, Box #665, Rochester, NY, 14620, USA,
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Dec;134(12):1667-71. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2096-3. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
This study compares re-operation rates and financial burden following the treatment of femoral neck fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty compared to non-displaced femoral neck fractures treated with cannulated screws.
Data was retrospectively analyzed from a prospective database at a university hospital setting on patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fractures and those with non-displaced femoral neck fractures treated with cannulated screws over a 7-year period. Re-operation rates were determined and financial data was analyzed. Charges refer to amounts billed by the hospital to insurance carriers, while costs refer to financial burden carried by the hospital during treatment.
There were 491 femoral neck fractures (475 patients) that underwent hemiarthroplasty (HA) and 120 non-displaced fractures (119 patients) treated with cannulated screw (CannS) fixation. Both groups had similar age, sex, Charlson co-morbidity scores, pre-operative Parker mobility scores, and 12-month mortality. There were 29 (5.9 %) reoperations in the HA group and 16 (13.3 %) in the CannS group (P = 0.007). The majority of re-operations occurred within 12 months for both groups [21/29 (72 %) HA group; 15/16 (94 %) CannS group; P = 0.13]. Average hospital charges per patient for the index procedure were higher in the HA group ($17,880 ± 745) compared to the CannS group ($14,104 ± 5,047; P < 0.001). After accounting for additional procedures related to their initial surgical fixation, average hospital charges and costs remained higher in the HA group.
Patients treated with hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures have lower re-operation rates than patients treated with cannulated screws for non-displaced femoral neck fractures, with 80 % of re-operations occurring in the first 12 months. Hospital charges and costs to the hospital for treating patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty were higher than patients treated with cannulated screws for the index procedure alone, and after accounting for re-operations.
本研究比较了半髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折与空心钉治疗无移位股骨颈骨折后的再次手术率和经济负担。
回顾性分析了一所大学医院前瞻性数据库中7年间接受股骨颈骨折半髋关节置换术的患者以及接受空心钉治疗的无移位股骨颈骨折患者的数据。确定再次手术率并分析财务数据。收费指医院向保险公司开具的账单金额,而成本指医院在治疗期间承担的经济负担。
有491例股骨颈骨折(475例患者)接受了半髋关节置换术(HA),120例无移位骨折(119例患者)接受了空心钉(CannS)固定。两组患者在年龄、性别、查尔森合并症评分、术前帕克活动能力评分和12个月死亡率方面相似。HA组有29例(5.9%)再次手术,CannS组有16例(13.3%)再次手术(P = 0.007)。两组中大多数再次手术发生在12个月内[HA组21/29(72%);CannS组15/16(94%);P = 0.13]。HA组首次手术的平均每位患者医院收费(17,880美元±745美元)高于CannS组(14,104美元±5,047美元;P < 0.001)。在考虑与初始手术固定相关的额外手术后,HA组的平均医院收费和成本仍然较高。
股骨颈骨折接受半髋关节置换术治疗的患者比无移位股骨颈骨折接受空心钉治疗的患者再次手术率更低,80%的再次手术发生在最初12个月内。医院治疗接受半髋关节置换术患者的收费和成本高于仅接受空心钉治疗的患者,且在考虑再次手术后也是如此。