• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自上而下控制对任务切换和长期记忆的相应影响。

Corresponding influences of top-down control on task switching and long-term memory.

作者信息

Richter Franziska R, Yeung Nick

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , New York University , New York , NY , USA.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(6):1124-47. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.976579. Epub 2014 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1080/17470218.2014.976579
PMID:25337969
Abstract

Three experiments investigated the impact of cognitive control on current performance and later memory in task switching. Participants first switched between object and word classification tasks, performed on picture-word stimuli that each appeared only once, then were tested for their recognition memory of these items. Each experiment replicated the recent finding that task switching results in reduced selectivity in later memory for task-relevant over task-irrelevant items. Top-down control was manipulated through varying the time available for advance task preparation (Experiment 1), the freedom of choice over which task to perform (Experiment 2), and the availability of reward incentives (Experiment 3). For each manipulation, more effective top-down control during task switching was associated with increased selectivity in memory for task-relevant information. These findings shed new light on the role of cognitive control in long-term memory encoding, in particular supporting an interactive model in which long-term memory reflects the enduring traces of perceptual and cognitive processes that operate under the selective influence of top-down control.

摘要

三项实验研究了认知控制对任务切换中当前表现及后续记忆的影响。参与者首先在对仅出现一次的图片-单词刺激进行的物体和单词分类任务之间进行切换,然后对他们对这些项目的识别记忆进行测试。每项实验都重复了最近的一项发现,即任务切换会导致后续记忆中对任务相关项目的选择性降低,而对任务无关项目的选择性增加。通过改变提前进行任务准备的可用时间(实验1)、对执行哪个任务的选择自由度(实验2)以及奖励激励的可用性(实验3)来操纵自上而下的控制。对于每种操纵方式,任务切换过程中更有效的自上而下控制都与对任务相关信息的记忆选择性增加有关。这些发现为认知控制在长期记忆编码中的作用提供了新的线索,特别支持了一种交互模型,即长期记忆反映了在自上而下控制的选择性影响下运作的感知和认知过程的持久痕迹。

相似文献

1
Corresponding influences of top-down control on task switching and long-term memory.自上而下控制对任务切换和长期记忆的相应影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(6):1124-47. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.976579. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
2
ERP Correlates of Encoding Success and Encoding Selectivity in Attention Switching.注意转换中编码成功与编码选择性的事件相关电位关联
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 1;11(12):e0167396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167396. eCollection 2016.
3
Reward associations impact both iconic and visual working memory.奖励关联会影响图像记忆和视觉工作记忆。
Vision Res. 2015 Feb;107:22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.11.008. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
4
Working memory encoding delays top-down attention to visual cortex.工作记忆编码会延迟自上而下的视觉皮层注意。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2593-604. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21621. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
5
Task Switching Hurts Memory Encoding.任务切换会损害记忆编码。
Exp Psychol. 2019 Jan;66(1):58-67. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000431.
6
Bivalent task switching and memory load: Similar costs on reaction times, different costs on concurrent timing.双价任务切换与记忆负荷:反应时间上的相似成本,同时计时上的不同成本。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2014 Sep;68(3):194-203. doi: 10.1037/cep0000017.
7
Component processes in voluntary task switching.自愿任务切换中的组成过程。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 May;67(5):843-60. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.836232. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
8
Memory and cognitive control in task switching.任务转换中的记忆和认知控制。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1256-63. doi: 10.1177/0956797612444613. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
9
On the automaticity of semantic processing during task switching.任务切换过程中语义加工的自动化。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Mar;24(3):611-26. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00149. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
10
Long-term visual associations affect attentional guidance.长期视觉关联影响注意力引导。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jun;137(2):243-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Target detection does not influence temporal memory.目标探测不会影响时间记忆。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Aug;85(6):1936-1948. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02723-3. Epub 2023 May 18.
2
Attentional attenuation (rather than attentional boost) through task switching leads to a selective long-term memory decline.通过任务切换导致的注意力衰减(而非注意力增强)会导致选择性的长期记忆衰退。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 20;13:1027871. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027871. eCollection 2022.
3
Independent subsequent memory effects of conflict resolution and response inhibition.
冲突解决和反应抑制的独立后续记忆效应。
Psychol Res. 2022 Jul;86(5):1565-1577. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01575-6. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
4
Stimulating the parietal cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): no effects on attention and memory.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)刺激顶叶皮层:对注意力和记忆无影响。
AIMS Neurosci. 2020 Nov 18;8(1):33-46. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2021002. eCollection 2021.
5
Different impact of task switching and response-category conflict on subsequent memory.任务转换和反应类别冲突对后续记忆的不同影响。
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):679-696. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01274-3. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
6
Task Switching Hurts Memory Encoding.任务切换会损害记忆编码。
Exp Psychol. 2019 Jan;66(1):58-67. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000431.
7
ERP Correlates of Encoding Success and Encoding Selectivity in Attention Switching.注意转换中编码成功与编码选择性的事件相关电位关联
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 1;11(12):e0167396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167396. eCollection 2016.
8
Reward Anticipation Dynamics during Cognitive Control and Episodic Encoding: Implications for Dopamine.认知控制和情景编码过程中的奖赏预期动态:对多巴胺的启示
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Nov 1;10:555. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00555. eCollection 2016.
9
Cognitive Function and Its Relationship with Macular Pigment Optical Density and Serum Concentrations of its Constituent Carotenoids.认知功能及其与黄斑色素光密度及其组成类胡萝卜素血清浓度的关系。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;48(1):261-77. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150199.