Lewton Kristi L
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2015 Jan;298(1):230-48. doi: 10.1002/ar.23070.
The pelvic girdle is a complex structure with a critical role in locomotion, but efforts to model the mechanical effects of locomotion on its shape remain difficult. Traditional approaches to understanding form and function include univariate adaptive hypothesis-testing derived from mechanical models. Geometric morphometric (GM) methods can yield novel insight into overall three-dimensional shape similarities and differences across groups, although the utility of GM in assessing functional differences has been questioned. This study evaluates the contributions of both univariate and GM approaches to unraveling the trait-function associations between pelvic form and locomotion. Three-dimensional landmarks were collected on a phylogenetically-broad sample of 180 pelves from nine primate taxa. Euclidean interlandmark distances were calculated to facilitate testing of biomechanical hypotheses, and a principal components (PC) analysis was performed on Procrustes coordinates to examine overall shape differences. Both linear dimensions and PC scores were subjected to phylogenetic ANOVA. Many of the null hypotheses relating linear dimensions to locomotor loading were not rejected. Although both analytical approaches suggest that ilium width and robusticity differ among locomotor groups, the GM analysis also suggests that ischiopubic shape differentiates groups. Although GM provides additional quantitative results beyond the univariate analyses, this study highlights the need for new GM methods to more specifically address functional shape differences among species. Until these methods are developed, it would be prudent to accompany tests of directional biomechanical hypotheses with current GM methods for a more nuanced understanding of shape and function.
骨盆带是一个复杂的结构,在运动中起着关键作用,但模拟运动对其形状的机械影响的努力仍然很困难。理解形态与功能的传统方法包括从力学模型中推导出来的单变量适应性假设检验。几何形态测量(GM)方法可以对不同群体之间的整体三维形状异同提供新的见解,尽管GM在评估功能差异方面的效用受到了质疑。本研究评估了单变量方法和GM方法在揭示骨盆形态与运动之间的性状-功能关联方面的贡献。在来自9个灵长类分类群的180个骨盆的系统发育广泛样本上收集了三维地标。计算欧几里得地标间距离以促进生物力学假设的检验,并对普氏坐标进行主成分(PC)分析以检查整体形状差异。线性尺寸和PC分数都进行了系统发育方差分析。许多将线性尺寸与运动负荷相关联的零假设未被拒绝。尽管两种分析方法都表明运动群体之间髂骨宽度和粗壮程度存在差异,但GM分析还表明耻骨坐骨形状可区分不同群体。尽管GM提供了超出单变量分析的额外定量结果,但本研究强调需要新的GM方法来更具体地解决物种之间的功能形状差异。在开发出这些方法之前,明智的做法是将定向生物力学假设的检验与当前的GM方法相结合,以便对形状和功能有更细致入微的理解。