• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗事故改革:非经济损害赔偿限额使赔付减少了15%,不同专业领域的影响各异。

Medical malpractice reform: noneconomic damages caps reduced payments 15 percent, with varied effects by specialty.

作者信息

Seabury Seth A, Helland Eric, Jena Anupam B

机构信息

Seth A. Seabury (

Eric Helland is a professor of economics at Claremont McKenna College, in Claremont, and the RAND Corporation in Santa Monica, both in California.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Nov;33(11):2048-56. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0492. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0492
PMID:25339633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4278571/
Abstract

The impact of medical malpractice reforms on the average size of malpractice payments in specific physician specialties is unknown and subject to debate. We analyzed a national sample of malpractice claims for the period 1985-2010, merged with information on state liability reforms, to estimate the impact of state noneconomic damages caps on average malpractice payment size for physicians overall and for ten different specialty categories. We then compared how the effects differed according to the restrictiveness of the cap ($250,000 versus $500,000). We found that, overall, noneconomic damages caps reduced average payments by $42,980 (15 percent), compared to having no cap at all. A more restrictive $250,000 cap reduced average payments by $59,331 (20 percent), and a less restrictive $500,000 cap had no significant effect, compared to no cap at all. The effect of the caps overall varied according to specialty, with the largest impact being on claims involving pediatricians and the smallest on claims involving surgical subspecialties and ophthalmologists.

摘要

医疗事故改革对特定医生专业领域医疗事故赔偿的平均规模的影响尚不清楚,且存在争议。我们分析了1985年至2010年期间全国范围内的医疗事故索赔样本,并结合了各州责任改革的信息,以估计各州非经济损害赔偿上限对医生总体以及十个不同专业类别的医疗事故赔偿平均规模的影响。然后,我们比较了根据赔偿上限的严格程度(25万美元与50万美元)影响有何不同。我们发现,总体而言,与完全没有赔偿上限相比,非经济损害赔偿上限使平均赔偿额减少了42,980美元(15%)。与完全没有赔偿上限相比,更为严格的25万美元赔偿上限使平均赔偿额减少了59,331美元(20%),而限制较小的50万美元赔偿上限则没有显著影响。赔偿上限的总体影响因专业而异,对涉及儿科医生的索赔影响最大,对涉及外科亚专科医生和眼科医生的索赔影响最小。

相似文献

1
Medical malpractice reform: noneconomic damages caps reduced payments 15 percent, with varied effects by specialty.医疗事故改革:非经济损害赔偿限额使赔付减少了15%,不同专业领域的影响各异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Nov;33(11):2048-56. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0492. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
2
The US Medical Liability System: evidence for legislative reform.美国医疗责任制度:立法改革的证据
Ann Fam Med. 2006 May-Jun;4(3):240-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.535.
3
Statutory caps: an involuntary contribution to the medical malpractice insurance crisis or a reasonable mechanism for obtaining affordable health care?法定上限:是对医疗事故保险危机的非自愿贡献,还是获得可负担医疗保健的合理机制?
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1993 Spring;9:337-75.
4
Medical malpractice reform and insurer claims defense: unintended effects?医疗事故改革与保险公司的理赔抗辩:意外后果?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2007 Oct;32(5):843-65. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2007-032.
5
Commentary: binding early offers versus caps for medical malpractice claims?评论:医疗事故索赔的早期要约约束与赔偿上限?
Milbank Q. 2007 Jun;85(2):287-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00487.x.
6
The medical liability climate and prospects for reform.医疗责任环境和改革前景。
JAMA. 2014 Nov 26;312(20):2146-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.10705.
7
Medical Malpractice Damage Caps and Provider Reimbursement.医疗事故损害赔偿限额与医疗服务提供者报销
Health Econ. 2017 Jan;26(1):118-135. doi: 10.1002/hec.3283. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
8
Commentary: malpractice reform in policy perspective.评论:政策视角下的医疗事故改革
Milbank Q. 2007 Jun;85(2):297-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00488.x.
9
Are new liability caps working?新的责任上限起作用了吗?
Manag Care. 2003 Feb;12(2):14-6.
10
Controlling large malpractice claims: the unexpected impact of damage caps.控制巨额医疗事故索赔:损害赔偿限额的意外影响。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1991 Fall;16(3):441-64. doi: 10.1215/03616878-16-3-441.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Noneconomic Damage Caps Reduce Medical Malpractice Insurance Premiums? Evidence from North Carolina.非经济损害赔偿限额会降低医疗事故保险费吗?来自北卡罗来纳州的证据。
Risk Manag Insur Rev. 2022 Summer;25(2):201-218. doi: 10.1111/rmir.12216. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
2
Evolutionary game analysis on the regulation of medical devices used in health services delivery.卫生服务提供中医疗设备监管的演化博弈分析
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83068-1.
3
Medical malpractice litigation and daylight saving time.医疗事故诉讼与夏令时。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2024 Jun 1;20(6):933-940. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.11038.
4
Factors Associated With Physician Loss in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Malpractice Lawsuits.前交叉韧带重建医疗事故诉讼中与医生败诉相关的因素。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Nov 17;5(11):2325967117738957. doi: 10.1177/2325967117738957. eCollection 2017 Nov.
5
Rates and Characteristics of Paid Malpractice Claims Among US Physicians by Specialty, 1992-2014.1992 - 2014年美国各专科医生医疗事故索赔付费率及特征
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 May 1;177(5):710-718. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0311.
6
Resolving Malpractice Claims after Tort Reform: Experience in a Self-Insured Texas Public Academic Health System.侵权法改革后解决医疗事故索赔:德克萨斯州一个自我投保的公立学术医疗系统的经验。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):2615-2633. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12609. Epub 2016 Nov 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicolegal characteristics of cardiac catheterization litigation in the United States, 1985 to 2009.美国 1985 年至 2009 年心脏导管术诉讼的医学法律特征。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 15;112(10):1662-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.07.051. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
2
Malpractice risk among US pediatricians.美国儿科医生的医疗事故风险。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131(6):1148-54. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3443. Epub 2013 May 6.
3
The Welfare Effects of Medical Malpractice Liability.医疗事故责任的福利效应
Int Rev Law Econ. 2012 Dec;32(4):356-369. doi: 10.1016/j.irle.2012.07.003.
4
On average, physicians spend nearly 11 percent of their 40-year careers with an open, unresolved malpractice claim.平均而言,医生在其 40 年的职业生涯中,有近 11%的时间都在处理未解决的医疗事故索赔。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jan;32(1):111-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0967.
5
Outcomes of medical malpractice litigation against US physicians.针对美国医生的医疗事故诉讼结果。
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jun 11;172(11):892-4. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1416.
6
Defense costs of medical malpractice claims.医疗事故索赔的辩护费用。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 5;366(14):1354-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1114805.
7
The impact of defense expenses in medical malpractice claims.医疗事故索赔中防御费用的影响。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Spring;40(1):135-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00651.x.
8
Medical malpractice: impact of the crisis and effect of state tort reforms.医疗事故:危机的影响与州侵权行为改革的效果
Synth Proj Res Synth Rep. 2006 May(10). Epub 2006 May 1.
9
Malpractice risk according to physician specialty.根据医师专业划分的医疗事故风险。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 18;365(7):629-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1012370.
10
Physicians' fears of malpractice lawsuits are not assuaged by tort reforms.医生对医疗事故诉讼的担忧并未因侵权改革而得到缓解。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Sep;29(9):1585-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0135.