Allen Susan M, Piette Elizabeth R, Mor Vincent
Providence VA HSR&D Center for Innovation (COIN) in Long Term Services and Supports for Vulnerable Veterans and Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Institute for Quantitative Biomedical Sciences, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014 Nov;69 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S51-8. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu124.
Our objective is to estimate and compare the prevalence of selected adverse consequences associated with unmet need for assistance among a socioeconomically and medically vulnerable subgroup of the older adult population, those who are dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid, with those eligible for Medicare only.
Using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a representative survey of the older Medicare population, we calculated the prevalence of disability-related need for assistance with self-care, household tasks, and mobility activities and the prevalence of adverse consequences of unmet need by dually eligible and Medicare only status.
Over 2 million community-dwelling older persons experienced an adverse consequence due to unmet need for assistance with self-care (e.g., soiled their clothes), over 2 million experienced adverse consequences due to unmet need for assistance with household tasks (e.g., went without groceries), and over 3 million persons experienced at least one adverse consequence of unmet need for assistance with mobility-related activities (e.g., had to stay in bed) in the month prior to the NHATS interview. Dually eligible persons experienced higher rates of 6 of the 11 adverse consequences studied and were more likely to have at least one adverse consequence in all 3 domains than others.
Several care models are emerging with the goal of integrating medical care, behavioral health, and long-term services for the dual eligible population. Indicators of adverse consequences of unmet need could be used to monitor the quality and adequacy of such care systems.
我们的目的是估计并比较老年人口中一个社会经济和医疗方面都较为脆弱的亚群体(即同时符合医疗保险和医疗补助资格的人群)与仅符合医疗保险资格的人群中,因未得到所需援助而产生的特定不良后果的患病率。
利用来自全国健康与老龄化趋势研究(NHATS)的数据,该研究是对老年医疗保险人群的一项代表性调查,我们计算了在自我护理、家务劳动和移动活动方面与残疾相关的援助需求患病率,以及根据双重资格和仅符合医疗保险资格的状况计算未满足需求的不良后果患病率。
在NHATS访谈前一个月,超过200万居家老年人因自我护理方面未得到所需援助而经历了不良后果(例如弄脏衣服),超过200万因家务劳动方面未得到所需援助而经历了不良后果(例如没有食品杂货),超过300万人因移动相关活动方面未得到所需援助而经历了至少一种不良后果(例如不得不卧床)。在研究的11种不良后果中,双重资格人群中有6种的发生率更高,并且在所有三个领域中比其他人更有可能至少经历一种不良后果。
几种护理模式正在兴起,目标是为双重资格人群整合医疗护理、行为健康和长期服务。未满足需求的不良后果指标可用于监测此类护理系统的质量和充分性。