• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险优势受益人的合同终止和保险登记。

Contract Termination and Insurance Enrollment Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.

机构信息

Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2428267. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.28267.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.28267
PMID:39163045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11337069/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Approximately one-fifth of Medicare Advantage (MA) contracts terminated their participation in the MA program between 2011 and 2020. Little is known about subsequent insurance choices following a termination.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the insurance destinations of MA enrollees and the characteristics of enrollees who switch into traditional Medicare (TM) after a contract termination.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study examined MA program data of MA beneficiaries in the Medicare Master Beneficiary File from 2016 to 2018. Statistical analysis was performed from June 2023 to April 2024.

EXPOSURES

Beneficiary characteristics, including age, sex, race and ethnicity, dual eligibility; hospital, nursing home, and home health utilization; and contract characteristics, including plan type, vertical integration, premium, and MA star rating.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

The main outcome was switching to TM in the year immediately after termination. We also evaluated the characteristics of contracts among those who remained in MA.

RESULTS

A total of 117 681 beneficiaries were included in this analysis (64 654 [54.9%] female; 409 [0.4%] American Indian or Alaska Native; 2817 [2.4%] Asian; 76 725 [16.8%] Black; 11 131 [9.5%] Hispanic; 81 226 [69.0%] White; and 2373 [2.0%] other race or ethnicity; 27 078 [23.0%] dual-eligible; mean [SD] age, 71.2 [10.4] years). Following a contract termination, 20.1% (95% CI, 19.9%-20.4%) of enrollees switched to TM, including 32.7% (95% CI, 32.4%-33.1%) of dual-eligible beneficiaries and 16.4% (95% CI, 16.2%-16.5%) of non-dual-eligible beneficiaries. In nonterminated contracts, the concurrent switch rate was 6.2% (95% CI, 6.2%-6.2%) for all, 10.4% (95% CI, 10.4%-10.4%) for dual-eligible beneficiaries and 5.1% (95% CI, 5.1%-5.1%) for non-dual-eligible enrollees. The highest switch rates to TM were among Black enrollees (32.3% [95% CI, 31.7%-32.8%]) and those with prior use of hospital (31.3% [95% CI, 30.7%-31.9%], nursing home, 41.4% [95% CI, 40.4%-42.4%], or home health care (28.3% [95% CI, 27.4%-29.2%]). Beneficiaries who stayed in MA selected higher-rated star plans (mean posttermination contract star rating of 3.8 [95% CI, 3.8-3.8] stars compared with 3.3 [95% CI, 3.3-3.3] stars in the terminated year), but did not pay more in monthly premiums with 66.5% (95% CI, 66.2%-66.8%) paying the same or lower premiums.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional study, 1 in 5 MA beneficiaries switched to TM after a contract termination, with Black beneficiaries and those with more intensive health needs having the highest switch rates. These findings highlight the need to examine consequences of contract terminations and subsequent insurance destinations on access to care and health outcomes, especially among those with marginalized race and ethnicity, those who are dual-eligible, and beneficiaries with higher health care needs.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb63/11337069/2c4c38d367ca/jamanetwopen-e2428267-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb63/11337069/43a712c0655e/jamanetwopen-e2428267-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb63/11337069/11619d9e41b2/jamanetwopen-e2428267-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb63/11337069/61d63ad9b489/jamanetwopen-e2428267-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb63/11337069/2c4c38d367ca/jamanetwopen-e2428267-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb63/11337069/43a712c0655e/jamanetwopen-e2428267-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb63/11337069/11619d9e41b2/jamanetwopen-e2428267-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb63/11337069/61d63ad9b489/jamanetwopen-e2428267-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb63/11337069/2c4c38d367ca/jamanetwopen-e2428267-g004.jpg
摘要

重要性

在 2011 年至 2020 年期间,约有五分之一的医疗保险优势(MA)合同终止了他们在 MA 计划中的参与。对于合同终止后随后的保险选择,人们知之甚少。

目的

研究 MA 参保者的保险目的地,以及在合同终止后转入传统医疗保险(TM)的参保者的特征。

设计、地点和参与者:本横断面研究检查了 2016 年至 2018 年 Medicare 主受益档案中 MA 受益人的 MA 计划数据。统计分析于 2023 年 6 月至 2024 年 4 月进行。

暴露因素

包括年龄、性别、种族和民族、双重资格;医院、疗养院和家庭保健的利用情况;以及合同特征,包括计划类型、垂直整合、保费和 MA 星级评级。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是在终止后的一年内转为 TM。我们还评估了那些留在 MA 中的合同的特征。

结果

共纳入 117681 名受益人的分析(64654 [54.9%] 为女性;409 [0.4%] 为美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民;2817 [2.4%] 为亚洲人;76725 [16.8%] 为黑人;11131 [9.5%] 为西班牙裔;81226 [69.0%] 为白人;2373 [2.0%] 为其他种族或民族;27078 [23.0%] 为双重资格;平均[标准差]年龄为 71.2[10.4]岁)。合同终止后,20.1%(95%CI,19.9%-20.4%)的参保者转为 TM,包括 32.7%(95%CI,32.4%-33.1%)的双重资格受益人和 16.4%(95%CI,16.2%-16.5%)的非双重资格受益。在非终止合同中,同期转换率为所有合同的 6.2%(95%CI,6.2%-6.2%),双重资格受益人的 10.4%(95%CI,10.4%-10.4%)和非双重资格受益人的 5.1%(95%CI,5.1%-5.1%)。转为 TM 的最高比率是在黑人参保者中(32.3%[95%CI,31.7%-32.8%])和那些之前使用过医院(31.3%[95%CI,30.7%-31.9%])、疗养院(41.4%[95%CI,40.4%-42.4%])或家庭保健(28.3%[95%CI,27.4%-29.2%])的参保者。留在 MA 的参保者选择了评级更高的星计划(终止年度后平均签约合同星级为 3.8[95%CI,3.8-3.8]星,而终止年度为 3.3[95%CI,3.3-3.3]星),但每月保费并没有增加,66.5%(95%CI,66.2%-66.8%)的人支付相同或更低的保费。

结论和相关性

在这项横断面研究中,1/5 的 MA 受益者在合同终止后转为 TM,黑人受益人和健康需求较高的受益者的转换率最高。这些发现强调需要检查合同终止和随后的保险目的地对获得医疗保健和健康结果的影响,特别是在那些边缘化的种族和民族、双重资格和医疗保健需求较高的受益者中。

相似文献

1
Contract Termination and Insurance Enrollment Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.医疗保险优势受益人的合同终止和保险登记。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2428267. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.28267.
2
Medicare Advantage Enrollment Following the 21st Century Cures Act in Adults With End-Stage Renal Disease.《21 世纪治愈法案》实施后终末期肾病成年患者的医疗保险优势计划入保情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432772. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32772.
3
Association of Health Insurance Literacy With Enrollment in Traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Plan Characteristics Within Medicare Advantage.健康保险素养与传统医疗保险、医疗保险优势计划和医疗保险优势计划内计划特征的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2146792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46792.
4
Analysis of Drivers of Disenrollment and Plan Switching Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.医疗保险优势计划参保人退保和计划转换的驱动因素分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Apr 1;179(4):524-532. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7639.
5
Trends in Cumulative Disenrollment in the Medicare Advantage Program, 2011-2020.2011-2020 年医疗保险优势计划累计退保趋势。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Aug 4;4(8):e232717. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.2717.
6
Association of Medicare Advantage Star Ratings With Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Quality of Care.医疗保险优势星级评定与医疗质量的种族、民族和社会经济差异的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jun 11;2(6):e210793. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0793. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Outcomes for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries With Dementia in Special Needs Plans and Other Medicare Advantage Plans.特殊需求计划和其他医疗保险优势计划中患有痴呆症的双重资格受益人的结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2461219. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.61219.
8
Quality of Home Health Agencies Serving Traditional Medicare vs Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.服务传统 Medicare 与 Medicare Advantage 受益人的家庭保健机构的质量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1910622. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10622.
9
Patient-Reported Characteristics Across Dual-Eligible Medicare Advantage Plan Types.双重资格医疗保险优势计划类型的患者报告特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255791. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5791.
10
Use and Costs of Supplemental Benefits in Medicare Advantage, 2017-2021.2017 - 2021年医疗保险优势计划中补充福利的使用情况及成本
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454699. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54699.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Outcomes and Medicare Advantage Payer-Hospital Integration.手术结果与医疗保险优势支付方 - 医院整合
JAMA Surg. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.2885.
2
Medicare Advantage Part B Premium Givebacks and Enrollment.医疗保险优势B部分保费返还与参保情况
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jun 7;6(6):e251215. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1215.
3
Examining Trends in Medicare Advantage Plan Disenrollment Associated With Expanded Supplemental Benefit Adoption.审视与扩大补充福利采用相关的医疗保险优势计划退保趋势。

本文引用的文献

1
Characteristics of Terminated Medicare Advantage Contracts, 2011 to 2020.2011年至2020年终止的医疗保险优势合同的特征
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Oct 7;3(10):e223704. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.3704.
2
Racial and ethnic disparities in access to and enrollment in high-quality Medicare Advantage plans.医疗保险优势计划在获取和参与方面的种族和民族差异。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr;58(2):303-313. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13977. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
3
Mortality Effects and Choice Across Private Health Insurance Plans.私人医疗保险计划中的死亡率影响与选择
Health Serv Res. 2025 May;60 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e14460. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14460. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
Q J Econ. 2021 Aug;136(3):1557-1610. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjab017. Epub 2021 May 6.
4
Growth In Medicare Advantage Greatest Among Black And Hispanic Enrollees.医疗保险优势计划中,黑人和西班牙裔参保者的增长幅度最大。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Jun;40(6):945-950. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00118.
5
Seniors don't use Medicare.Gov: how do eligible beneficiaries obtain information about Medicare Advantage Plans in the United States?老年人不使用 Medicare.gov:符合条件的受益人如何获取有关美国 Medicare Advantage 计划的信息?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 15;21(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06135-7.
6
Plan Switching and Stickiness in Medicare Advantage: A Qualitative Interview With Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.医疗保险优势计划中的转换和粘性:对医疗保险优势计划受益人的定性访谈。
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Dec;78(6):693-702. doi: 10.1177/1077558720944284. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
7
Provider Integrated Medicare Advantage Plans Are Associated With Differences In Patterns Of Inpatient Care.医保优势计划提供者整合与住院护理模式差异相关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 May;39(5):843-851. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00678.
8
Limited Medigap Consumer Protections Are Associated With Higher Reenrollment In Medicare Advantage Plans.有限的医疗保险补充计划消费者保护措施与更高的医疗保险优势计划再参保率相关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 May;38(5):782-787. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05428.
9
Medicare Advantage Checkup.医疗保险优势体检
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 29;379(22):2163-2172. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr1804089. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
10
Persistence and Drivers of High-Cost Status Among Dual-Eligible Medicare and Medicaid Beneficiaries: An Observational Study.双重资格的医疗保险和医疗补助受益人中高成本状况的持续存在及其驱动因素:一项观察性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 16;169(8):528-534. doi: 10.7326/M18-0085. Epub 2018 Oct 2.