Laboratory of Toxicology, BK21 PLUS Program for Creative Veterinary Science Research, Research Institute for Veterinary Science and College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Bio Applied Toxicology, Hoseo Toxicology Research Center, Hoseo University, Asan, Korea.
Toxicol Res. 2014 Sep;30(3):159-68. doi: 10.5487/TR.2014.30.3.159.
Pesticides have provided significant benefits including plant disease control and increased crop yields since people developed and utilized them. However, pesticide use is associated with many adverse effects, which necessitate precise toxicological tests and risk assessment. Most of these methods are based on animal studies, but considerations of animal welfare and ethics require the development of alternative methods for the evaluation of pesticide toxicity. Although the usage of laboratory animals is inevitable in scientific evaluation and alternative approaches have limitations in the whole coverage, continuous effort is necessary to minimize animal use and to develop reliable alternative tests for pesticide evaluation. This review discusses alternative approaches for pesticide toxicity tests and hazard evaluation that have been used in peer-reviewed reports and could be applied in future studies based on the critical animal research principles of reduction, replacement, and refinement.
自人们开发和利用农药以来,它们在控制植物病害和提高作物产量方面带来了显著的益处。然而,农药的使用也伴随着许多不良影响,这就需要进行精确的毒理学测试和风险评估。这些方法大多基于动物研究,但出于动物福利和伦理的考虑,需要开发替代方法来评估农药毒性。虽然在科学评估中使用实验动物是不可避免的,并且替代方法在全面覆盖范围上存在局限性,但仍需要不断努力,以减少动物的使用,并开发可靠的替代测试方法来评估农药。本综述讨论了已在同行评议报告中使用的农药毒性测试和危害评估的替代方法,并可根据减少、替代和优化这三个关键的动物研究原则,应用于未来的研究中。