Paschall Mallie J, Lipperman-Kreda Sharon, Grube Joel W, Thomas Sue
Prevention Research Center, Oakland, California.
Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Santa Cruz, California.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014 Nov;75(6):901-7. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2014.75.901.
Many states and local communities have enacted social host (SH) laws to reduce underage drinking in private settings. However, little is known about whether such laws are effective. This study examined relationships between city SH laws and underage drinking in general and at parties in private settings.
SH policy data were collected for 50 California cities in 2009, and SH policies were rated for comprehensiveness and stringency. Annual telephone interviews were conducted with a cohort of 1,483 adolescents (ages 13-16 at Wave 1) from 2009 to 2011 to assess past-year alcohol use, heavy drinking, and drinking at parties. Multilevel analyses were first conducted for the total sample to examine relationships between SH laws and adolescents' past-year drinking, with other city and individual characteristics controlled for. Parallel analyses were then conducted for a subsample of 667 youth who had reported any past-year drinking.
SH policy ratings were unrelated to any of the past-year drinking outcomes for the total sample of adolescents. However, among past-year drinkers, a stronger SH policy was inversely related to drinking at parties (β = -.06, p < .05) but was unrelated to past-year alcohol use and heavy drinking in general. There were no moderating effects of SH policy on change in adolescents' past-year drinking over the 3-year period.
Local SH policies that include strict liability and civil penalties that are imposed administratively may be associated with less frequent underage drinking in private settings, particularly among adolescents who have already initiated alcohol use.
许多州和地方社区已颁布社会东道主(SH)法律,以减少在私人场所的未成年人饮酒现象。然而,对于此类法律是否有效却知之甚少。本研究考察了城市SH法律与一般情况下以及私人场所聚会上的未成年人饮酒之间的关系。
2009年收集了加利福尼亚州50个城市的SH政策数据,并对SH政策的全面性和严格性进行了评级。在2009年至2011年期间,对一组1483名青少年(第一波时年龄为13 - 16岁)进行了年度电话访谈,以评估过去一年的酒精使用情况、重度饮酒情况以及在聚会上的饮酒情况。首先对总样本进行多层次分析,以考察SH法律与青少年过去一年饮酒之间的关系,并控制其他城市和个体特征。然后对报告过去一年有饮酒行为的667名青少年子样本进行了平行分析。
SH政策评级与青少年总样本过去一年的任何饮酒结果均无关联。然而,在过去一年饮酒者中,更强有力的SH政策与在聚会上饮酒呈负相关(β = -0.06,p < 0.05),但与过去一年的一般酒精使用和重度饮酒无关。SH政策对青少年过去三年中过去一年饮酒变化没有调节作用。
包括严格责任和行政性民事处罚的地方SH政策可能与私人场所中未成年人饮酒频率降低有关,特别是在那些已经开始饮酒的青少年中。