Gruenewald Paul J, Remer Lillian G, LaScala Elizabeth A
Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Addiction. 2014 May;109(5):736-45. doi: 10.1111/add.12438. Epub 2014 Jan 19.
Social ecological theories suggest that greater community alcohol availability and individual drinker characteristics should jointly affect drinking patterns and the use of drinking contexts. We assessed relationships of demographic and personality characteristics of individual drinkers and environmental characteristics at the city-level to measures of drinking patterns and use of drinking contexts.
Multi-level statistical analyses of archival and survey data from 50 cities in California, USA.
An ecological sample of 50 geographically distinct cities with populations from 50 000 to 500 000 people.
General population telephone survey of 8553 adults 18 years of age and older stratified by cities.
Archival data on city-level alcohol outlet densities were combined with individual survey data identifying community conditions, individual demographic and psychosocial characteristics, frequencies of use of drinking contexts and drinking patterns.
Greater on-premise outlet densities were related to greater drinking frequencies (b = 2.9671, z = 4.688, P < 0.001) and volumes (b = 0.6274, z = 3.394, P < 0.001) and use of on-premises drinking places (bars, b = 0.3340, z = 2.645, P < 0.006 and restaurants, b = 0.1712, z = 2.770, P = 0.005). Individual demographic and personality characteristics were related to drinking and use of drinking contexts. For example, greater impulsivity was related to greater drinking frequencies (b = 0.2001, z = 2.088, P = 0.023) and logged quantities (b = 0.0151, z = 2.009, P = 0.026) and proportionately more drinking at bars (b = 0.0332, z = 2.016, P = 0.026) and parties (b = 0.1712, z = 2.770, P = 0.004).
Community availability of alcohol and individual drinker characteristics appear to act jointly to affect drinking levels and use of drinking contexts. These effects may increase risks related to drinking in some contexts (e.g. bars) much more than others (e.g. at friends' or relatives' homes).
社会生态理论表明,社区酒精供应增加以及饮酒者个体特征应共同影响饮酒模式和饮酒场合的选择。我们评估了个体饮酒者的人口统计学和人格特征以及城市层面的环境特征与饮酒模式和饮酒场合选择之间的关系。
对来自美国加利福尼亚州50个城市的档案和调查数据进行多层次统计分析。
选取50个地理位置不同、人口在5万至50万之间的城市作为生态样本。
对8553名18岁及以上成年人进行分层的城市普通人群电话调查。
将城市层面酒精销售点密度的档案数据与个体调查数据相结合,这些个体调查数据包括社区状况、个体人口统计学和心理社会特征、饮酒场合的使用频率以及饮酒模式。
营业场所销售点密度增加与饮酒频率增加(b = 2.9671,z = 4.688,P < 0.001)、饮酒量增加(b = 0.6274,z = 3.394,P < 0.001)以及营业场所饮酒地点(酒吧,b = 0.3340,z = 2.645,P < 0.006;餐厅,b = 0.1712,z = 2.770,P = 0.005)的使用有关。个体人口统计学和人格特征与饮酒及饮酒场合的选择有关。例如,冲动性增强与饮酒频率增加(b = 0.2001,z = 2.088,P = 0.023)、饮酒量增加(b = 0.0151,z = 2.009,P = 0.026)以及在酒吧饮酒的比例增加(b = 0.0332,z = 2.016,P = 0.026)和在聚会中饮酒的比例增加(b = 0.1712,z = 2.770,P = 0.004)有关。
社区酒精供应情况和个体饮酒者特征似乎共同作用,影响饮酒水平和饮酒场合的选择。在某些饮酒场合(如酒吧),这些影响可能比其他场合(如在朋友或亲戚家)更能增加与饮酒相关的风险。