• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人们会忽视对他人的关心,从而高估自己拒绝潜在浪漫伴侣的意愿。

People overestimate their willingness to reject potential romantic partners by overlooking their concern for other people.

机构信息

University of Toronto

Yale University.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2014 Dec;25(12):2233-40. doi: 10.1177/0956797614552828. Epub 2014 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1177/0956797614552828
PMID:25344347
Abstract

Mate preferences often fail to correspond with actual mate choices. We present a novel explanation for this phenomenon: People overestimate their willingness to reject unsuitable romantic partners. In two studies, single people were given the opportunity to accept or decline advances from potential dates who were physically unattractive (Study 1) or incompatible with their dating preferences (Study 2). We found that participants were significantly less willing to reject these unsuitable potential dates when they believed the situation to be real rather than hypothetical. This effect was partially explained by other-focused motives: Participants for whom the scenario was hypothetical anticipated less motivation to avoid hurting the potential date's feelings than participants actually felt when they believed the situation to be real. Thus, other-focused motives appear to exert an influence on mate choice that has been overlooked by researchers and laypeople alike.

摘要

伴侣偏好往往与实际伴侣选择不相符。我们为这一现象提出了一个新的解释:人们高估了自己拒绝不合适的浪漫伴侣的意愿。在两项研究中,单身人士有机会接受或拒绝那些外表不吸引人(研究 1)或与他们的约会偏好不匹配的潜在约会对象(研究 2)的求爱。我们发现,当参与者认为情况是真实的而不是假设的时,他们明显不太愿意拒绝这些不合适的潜在约会对象。这种效应部分可以用关注他人的动机来解释:与假设情况相比,参与者认为情况是真实的时,预计避免伤害潜在约会对象感情的动机要小得多。因此,关注他人的动机似乎对择偶选择产生了一种影响,而这种影响一直被研究人员和外行人所忽视。

相似文献

1
People overestimate their willingness to reject potential romantic partners by overlooking their concern for other people.人们会忽视对他人的关心,从而高估自己拒绝潜在浪漫伴侣的意愿。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Dec;25(12):2233-40. doi: 10.1177/0956797614552828. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
2
Perceived Acceptance From Outsiders Shapes Security in Romantic Relationships: The Overgeneralization of Extradyadic Experiences.来自外界的感知接纳塑造浪漫关系中的安全感:婚外情经历的过度泛化。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 May;42(5):632-44. doi: 10.1177/0146167216637844. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
3
Only because I love you: why people make and why they break promises in romantic relationships.只因为我爱你:为什么人们在恋爱关系中做出和违背承诺。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 May;100(5):887-904. doi: 10.1037/a0021857.
4
Taking chances in the face of threat: romantic risk regulation and approach motivation.面对威胁时冒险:浪漫的风险调节与趋近动机。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Jun;35(6):737-51. doi: 10.1177/0146167209332742. Epub 2009 Mar 23.
5
Willingness to date across race: differences among gay and heterosexual men and women.跨种族约会意愿:男同性恋者、异性恋男性和女性之间的差异。
Psychol Rep. 2011 Jun;108(3):711-6. doi: 10.2466/07.PR0.108.3.711-716.
6
How interdependent are stay/leave decisions? On staying in the relationship for the sake of the romantic partner.留/离决策有多相互依赖?为了伴侣而留在关系中。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Nov;115(5):805-824. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000139. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
7
Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: a double dissociation in predictive validity.对浪漫伴侣的身体吸引力的内隐和外显偏好:预测有效性的双重分离。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Nov;101(5):993-1011. doi: 10.1037/a0024061.
8
Of trophies and pillars: exploring the terror management functions of short-term and long-term relationship partners.论奖杯与支柱:探索短期与长期伴侣的恐怖管理功能。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Aug;36(8):1037-51. doi: 10.1177/0146167210374602. Epub 2010 Jun 28.
9
Effects of attractiveness and status in dating desire in homosexual and heterosexual men and women.在男同性恋和女同性恋者的约会欲望中,吸引力和地位的影响。
Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Jun;41(3):673-82. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9855-9. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
10
What do women's advertised mate preferences reveal? An analysis of video dating profiles.女性公开宣称的择偶偏好揭示了什么?对视频约会资料的分析。
Evol Psychol. 2013 May 29;11(2):383-91. doi: 10.1177/147470491301100208.

引用本文的文献

1
No gender differences in attraction to young partners: A study of 4500 blind dates.在对年轻伴侣的吸引力方面不存在性别差异:一项对4500次相亲的研究。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Feb 4;122(5):e2416984122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2416984122. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
2
Giving people the words to say no leads them to feel freer to say yes.让人们有拒绝的措辞会让他们更自由地说“是”。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 5;14(1):576. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50532-3.
3
Female Mate Choice : A Comparison Between Accept-the-Best and Reject-the-Worst Strategies in Sequential Decision Making.
雌性配偶选择:顺序决策中“接受最佳”与“拒绝最差”策略的比较
Evol Psychol. 2015 Sep 1;13(3):1474704915594553. doi: 10.1177/1474704915594553.
4
We're Not That Choosy: Emerging Evidence of a Progression Bias in Romantic Relationships.我们并非那么挑剔:浪漫关系中出现的进展偏见的新证据。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2021 Nov;25(4):317-343. doi: 10.1177/10888683211025860. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
5
Softening the Blow of Social Exclusion: The Responsive Theory of Social Exclusion.减轻社会排斥的冲击:社会排斥的响应理论
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 10;7:1570. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01570. eCollection 2016.