• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

留/离决策有多相互依赖?为了伴侣而留在关系中。

How interdependent are stay/leave decisions? On staying in the relationship for the sake of the romantic partner.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Nov;115(5):805-824. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000139. Epub 2018 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1037/pspi0000139
PMID:30035565
Abstract

The decision to end a romantic relationship can have a life-changing impact on the partner as well as the self. Research on close relationships has thus far focused on self-interested reasons why people choose to stay in their relationship versus leave. However, a growing body of research on decision-making and prosociality shows that when people make decisions that impact others, they take those others' feelings and perspectives into consideration. In the present research, we tested the prediction that people make stay/leave decisions prosocially, such that consideration for their romantic partner's feelings can discourage people from ending their relationships. In Study 1, a total of 1,348 participants in romantic relationships were tracked over a 10-week period. Study 2 was a preregistered replication and extension of Study 1, in which 500 participants contemplating a breakup were followed over a 2-month period. Both studies showed that the more dependent people believed their partner was on the relationship, the less likely they were to initiate a breakup. These findings held above and beyond a variety of self-focused variables (e.g., investment model components; Rusbult, Martz, & Agnew, 1998). These results suggest that people can be motivated to stay in relatively unfulfilling relationships for the sake of their romantic partner. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

结束一段浪漫关系的决定会对伴侣和自身产生改变人生的影响。因此,关于亲密关系的研究一直关注人们选择留在关系中而不是离开的自利原因。然而,越来越多关于决策和亲社会行为的研究表明,当人们做出影响他人的决策时,他们会考虑到他人的感受和观点。在本研究中,我们验证了这样一个预测:人们会做出亲社会的留/离决策,即考虑到伴侣的感受会阻止人们结束关系。在研究 1 中,共有 1348 名处于浪漫关系中的参与者在 10 周的时间内接受了跟踪调查。研究 2 是对研究 1 的预先注册复制和扩展,其中 500 名正在考虑分手的参与者在 2 个月的时间内接受了跟踪调查。这两项研究都表明,参与者认为他们的伴侣对关系的依赖程度越高,他们就越不可能主动提出分手。这些发现超出了各种以自我为中心的变量(例如,投资模型成分;Rusbult、Martz 和 Agnew,1998)的影响。这些结果表明,人们可能会为了伴侣的利益而留在相对不满足的关系中。(APA 心理学文献数据库记录(c)2018,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
How interdependent are stay/leave decisions? On staying in the relationship for the sake of the romantic partner.留/离决策有多相互依赖?为了伴侣而留在关系中。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Nov;115(5):805-824. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000139. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
2
An examination of accuracy and bias in perceptions of a partner's motives for health behaviour regulation.考察对伴侣进行健康行为调节的动机的感知的准确性和偏差。
Br J Health Psychol. 2018 Nov;23(4):872-887. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12321. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
3
Only because I love you: why people make and why they break promises in romantic relationships.只因为我爱你:为什么人们在恋爱关系中做出和违背承诺。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 May;100(5):887-904. doi: 10.1037/a0021857.
4
Romantic relationships in the ecosystem: Compassionate goals, nonzero-sum beliefs, and change in relationship quality.生态系统中的浪漫关系:富有同情心的目标、非零和信念与关系质量的变化。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jan;112(1):58-75. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000076. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
5
To do it or not to do it? How communally motivated people navigate sexual interdependence dilemmas.做还是不做?受群体动机驱使的人如何应对性相互依赖困境。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Jun;41(6):791-804. doi: 10.1177/0146167215580129. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
6
When and why do ideal partner preferences affect the process of initiating and maintaining romantic relationships?何时以及为何理想伴侣偏好会影响开始和维持浪漫关系的过程?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Nov;101(5):1012-32. doi: 10.1037/a0024062.
7
People overestimate their willingness to reject potential romantic partners by overlooking their concern for other people.人们会忽视对他人的关心,从而高估自己拒绝潜在浪漫伴侣的意愿。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Dec;25(12):2233-40. doi: 10.1177/0956797614552828. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
8
The Reasons People Think About Staying and Leaving Their Romantic Relationships: A Mixed-Method Analysis.人们思考维持和结束恋爱关系的原因:混合方法分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Aug;47(8):1279-1293. doi: 10.1177/0146167220966903. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
9
Predictive validity and adjustment of ideal partner preferences across the transition into romantic relationships.预测进入浪漫关系过程中理想伴侣偏好的有效性和调整。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Feb;116(2):313-330. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000170. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
10
The Distinct Effects of Empathic Accuracy for a Romantic Partner's Appeasement and Dominance Emotions.伴侣的安抚和支配情绪的共情准确性的独特影响。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jun;31(6):607-622. doi: 10.1177/0956797620904975. Epub 2020 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceiving greater commitment increases selfishness among disagreeable people.感知到更大的承诺会增加不合群的人的自私程度。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 3;19(6):e0303693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303693. eCollection 2024.
2
We're Not That Choosy: Emerging Evidence of a Progression Bias in Romantic Relationships.我们并非那么挑剔:浪漫关系中出现的进展偏见的新证据。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2021 Nov;25(4):317-343. doi: 10.1177/10888683211025860. Epub 2021 Jul 10.