• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《国际疾病分类》从第九版修订至第十版对瑞典伤害发病率外部原因登记的影响。

The effect of the transition from the ninth to the tenth revision of the International Classification of Diseases on external cause registration of injury morbidity in Sweden.

作者信息

Nilson Finn, Bonander Carl, Andersson Ragnar

机构信息

Division of Risk Management, Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.

出版信息

Inj Prev. 2015 Jun;21(3):189-94. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041337. Epub 2014 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041337
PMID:25344579
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Revisions of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) have previously been shown to cause dramatic effects with regard to injury mortality data when implemented. However, limited knowledge exists on the effects on the coding of external causes of injury morbidity, despite this being an important aspect with regard to injury prevention.

METHOD

Hospitalised injuries in Sweden were studied using time series intervention analysis to observe the effect of the ICD change from ICD-9 to ICD-10 in 1997 on external cause coding.

RESULTS

The results would suggest considerable coding issues with a large spike in the proportion of injury admissions registered without an external cause code in 1997, with continuing, although gradually diminishing, problems up to 2002. The coding change seems to have had an immediate effect on all external cause of injury categories, although the categories that were not directly convertible from ICD-9 to ICD-10 were seemingly more greatly affected.

DISCUSSION

The study illustrates the potential issues associated with changes between ICD revisions and the importance of data quality control both during surveillance and collection of data, but also when presenting injury trends across ICD versions.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,国际疾病分类(ICD)的修订在实施时会对伤害死亡率数据产生显著影响。然而,尽管伤害发病率的外部原因编码对于伤害预防而言是一个重要方面,但关于ICD修订对其编码的影响,人们了解得还很有限。

方法

采用时间序列干预分析方法,对瑞典住院伤害情况进行研究,以观察1997年从ICD - 9转换为ICD - 10这一ICD变化对外部原因编码的影响。

结果

结果表明存在相当多的编码问题,1997年无外部原因编码的伤害入院比例大幅飙升,直至2002年问题仍持续存在,不过逐渐有所减少。编码变化似乎对所有伤害外部原因类别都立即产生了影响,尽管那些无法直接从ICD - 9转换为ICD - 10的类别受到的影响似乎更大。

讨论

该研究说明了ICD版本修订之间变化所带来的潜在问题,以及在数据监测和收集过程中,乃至呈现不同ICD版本间伤害趋势时,数据质量控制的重要性。

相似文献

1
The effect of the transition from the ninth to the tenth revision of the International Classification of Diseases on external cause registration of injury morbidity in Sweden.《国际疾病分类》从第九版修订至第十版对瑞典伤害发病率外部原因登记的影响。
Inj Prev. 2015 Jun;21(3):189-94. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041337. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
2
Proposed Framework for Presenting Injury Data Using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) Diagnosis Codes.使用《国际疾病分类第十次修订本,临床修订版》(ICD-10-CM)诊断编码呈现损伤数据的拟议框架。
Natl Health Stat Report. 2016 Jan 22(89):1-20.
3
Classifying external causes of injury: history, current approaches, and future directions.伤害外部原因分类:历史、当前方法和未来方向。
Epidemiol Rev. 2012;34:4-16. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxr014. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
4
Deaths: injuries, 2002.死亡:伤害,2002年。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006 Jan 31;54(10):1-124.
5
Comparing ICD-9 and ICD-10: the impact on intentional and unintentional injury mortality statistics in Italy and Norway.比较 ICD-9 和 ICD-10:对意大利和挪威的故意伤害和意外伤害死亡率统计的影响。
Injury. 2013 Jan;44(1):132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
6
Interrupted time series design to evaluate the effect of the ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM coding transition on injury hospitalization trends.采用中断时间序列设计来评估从国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本(ICD-9-CM)到国际疾病分类第十版临床修订本(ICD-10-CM)编码转换对损伤住院趋势的影响。
Inj Epidemiol. 2018 Oct 1;5(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40621-018-0165-8.
7
ICD coding changes and discontinuities in trends in cause-specific mortality in six European countries, 1950-99.1950 - 1999年六个欧洲国家特定病因死亡率趋势中的国际疾病分类编码变化与不连续性
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Dec;82(12):904-13. Epub 2005 Jan 5.
8
The International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) External Cause-of-injury Framework for Categorizing Mechanism and Intent of Injury.《国际疾病分类》第十次修订本临床修订版(ICD - 10 - CM):用于对损伤机制和损伤意图进行分类的外部损伤原因框架。
Natl Health Stat Report. 2019 Dec(136):1-22.
9
Proportion of injury deaths with unspecified external cause codes: a comparison of Australia, Sweden, Taiwan and the US.外部原因编码未明确的伤害死亡比例:澳大利亚、瑞典、台湾地区和美国的比较。
Inj Prev. 2007 Aug;13(4):276-81. doi: 10.1136/ip.2006.012930.
10
Sources of coding discrepancies in injury morbidity data: implications for injury surveillance.伤害发病率数据编码差异的来源:对伤害监测的影响。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2010 Mar;17(1):53-60. doi: 10.1080/17457300903308324.

引用本文的文献

1
Trend control charts for multiple sclerosis case definitions.用于多发性硬化症病例定义的趋势控制图。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2024 Apr 30;9(1):2358. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v9i1.2358. eCollection 2024.
2
Control charts for chronic disease surveillance: testing algorithm sensitivity to changes in data coding.慢性病监测控制图:测试算法对数据编码变化的敏感性。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 28;22(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12328-w.
3
Exploring the implications of the new ICD-10-CM classification system for injury surveillance: analysis of dually coded data from two medical centres.
探讨新 ICD-10-CM 分类系统对伤害监测的影响:来自两个医疗中心的双重编码数据分析。
Inj Prev. 2021 Mar;27(S1):i19-i26. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043519.
4
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
CMAJ. 2019 Feb 25;191(8):E216-E230. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.181309.
5
The effect of transitioning to ICD-10-CM on acute injury surveillance of active duty service members.向国际疾病分类第十次修订本临床修正版(ICD-10-CM)过渡对现役军人急性损伤监测的影响。
Inj Epidemiol. 2018 Aug 20;5(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40621-018-0162-y.
6
[The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement].[使用常规收集的健康数据进行研究的报告(RECORD)声明]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016 Oct;115-116:33-48. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
7
The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.使用常规收集的健康数据进行研究的报告(RECORD)声明
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 6;12(10):e1001885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885. eCollection 2015 Oct.