Janssen Fanny, Kunst Anton E
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 7138, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Dec;82(12):904-13. Epub 2005 Jan 5.
To evaluate how often coding changes between and within revisions of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) complicate the description of long-term trends in cause-specific mortality.
Data on cause-specific mortality between 1950 and 1999 for men and women aged 60 and older were obtained from Denmark, England and Wales, Finland, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden. Data were obtained by five-year age groups. We constructed a concordance table using three-digit ICD codes. In addition we evaluated the occurrence of mortality discontinuities by visually inspecting cause-specific trends and country-specific background information. Evaluation was also based on quantification of the discontinuities using a Poisson regression model (including period splines). We compared the observed trends in cause-specific mortality with the trends after adjustment for the discontinuities caused by changes to coding.
In 45 out of 416 (10.8 %) instances of ICD revisions to cause-specific mortality codes, significant discontinuities that were regarded as being due to ICD revisions remained. The revisions from ICD-6 and ICD-7 to ICD-8 and a wide range of causes of death, with the exception of the specific cancers, were especially affected. Incidental changes in coding rules were also important causes of discontinuities in trends in cause-specific mortality, especially in England and Wales, Finland and Sweden. Adjusting for these discontinuities can lead to significant changes in trends, although these primarily affect only limited periods of time.
Despite using a carefully constructed concordance table based on three-digit ICD codes, mortality discontinuities arising as a result of coding changes (both between and within revisions) can lead to substantial changes in long-term trends in cause-specific mortality. Coding changes should therefore be evaluated by researchers and, where necessary, controlled for.
评估《国际疾病分类》(ICD)修订版之间及修订版内部的编码变化在多大程度上使特定病因死亡率长期趋势的描述变得复杂。
获取了丹麦、英格兰和威尔士、芬兰、荷兰、挪威及瑞典1950年至1999年60岁及以上男性和女性特定病因死亡率的数据。数据按五岁年龄组获取。我们使用三位ICD编码构建了一个一致性表。此外,我们通过直观检查特定病因趋势和特定国家的背景信息来评估死亡率不连续性的发生情况。评估还基于使用泊松回归模型(包括时间样条)对不连续性进行量化。我们将观察到的特定病因死亡率趋势与针对编码变化导致的不连续性进行调整后的趋势进行了比较。
在416例ICD特定病因死亡率编码修订实例中,有45例(10.8%)仍存在被认为是由ICD修订导致的显著不连续性。从ICD - 6和ICD - 7到ICD - 8的修订以及除特定癌症外的广泛死因尤其受到影响。编码规则的偶然变化也是特定病因死亡率趋势不连续性的重要原因,尤其是在英格兰和威尔士、芬兰及瑞典。对这些不连续性进行调整可能会导致趋势发生显著变化,尽管这些主要仅影响有限的时间段。
尽管使用了基于三位ICD编码精心构建的一致性表,但编码变化(修订版之间及修订版内部)导致的死亡率不连续性可能会使特定病因死亡率的长期趋势发生实质性变化。因此,研究人员应评估编码变化,并在必要时进行控制。