• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多支冠状动脉疾病患者的手术与经皮血运重建。

Surgical versus percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Struempellstraße 39, 04289, Leipzig, Germany,

出版信息

Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014 Dec;16(12):461. doi: 10.1007/s11883-014-0461-x.

DOI:10.1007/s11883-014-0461-x
PMID:25344743
Abstract

New-generation stents have been continually developed in order to improve the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Several randomized clinical trials have been conducted over the last two decades to compare the outcomes of PCI with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), which has been the time-tested treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. The Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial is one of the most recent and largest randomized controlled trials comparing PCI using the paclitaxel-eluting first-generation stent with CABG and was uniquely formulated to represent "real world" daily practice. The final 5-year main results of this trial and its various prespecified subgroups have been published in the past year. These results will form the basis of the new guidelines that will be published in the near future. This review is a compilation of the results of the SYNTAX trial and comparisons with other contemporary trials, meta-analyses, and retrospective studies of large registries and how these results help cardiac surgeons and cardiologists in judicious decision-making for their patients with multivessel coronary artery disease requiring revascularization.

摘要

新一代支架不断被开发出来,以提高经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的安全性和疗效。在过去的二十年中,进行了几项随机临床试验,以比较 PCI 与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的结果,CABG 一直是多支冠状动脉疾病的经过时间考验的治疗方法。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与紫杉醇心脏手术(SYNTAX)试验是最近和最大的比较 PCI 使用紫杉醇洗脱第一代支架与 CABG 的随机对照试验之一,其独特的设计代表了“真实世界”的日常实践。该试验的最终 5 年主要结果及其各种预先指定的亚组已在过去一年中公布。这些结果将构成即将发布的新指南的基础。这篇综述是对 SYNTAX 试验结果的汇编,并与其他当代试验、荟萃分析以及大型注册研究的回顾性研究进行了比较,以及这些结果如何帮助心脏外科医生和心脏病专家为需要血运重建的多支冠状动脉疾病患者做出明智的决策。

相似文献

1
Surgical versus percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.多支冠状动脉疾病患者的手术与经皮血运重建。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014 Dec;16(12):461. doi: 10.1007/s11883-014-0461-x.
2
Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: Meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与多支冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较:六项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Mar;16(2):70-7. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
3
Risk stratification in 3-vessel coronary artery disease: Applying the SYNTAX Score II in the Heart Team Discussion of the SYNTAX II trial.三支血管冠状动脉疾病的风险分层:在SYNTAX II试验的心脏团队讨论中应用SYNTAX评分II
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov 15;86(6):E229-38. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25907. Epub 2015 May 6.
4
2-year results of the AUTAX (Austrian Multivessel TAXUS-Stent) registry beyond the SYNTAX (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXUS and cardiac surgery) study.超越SYNTAX(TAXUS药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与心脏手术协同作用)研究的奥地利多支血管TAXUS支架(AUTAX)注册研究的2年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Aug;2(8):718-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.05.019.
5
Risk profile and 3-year outcomes from the SYNTAX percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting nested registries.SYNTAX 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术嵌套注册研究的风险特征和 3 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jun;5(6):618-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.02.013.
6
Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Trials on Myocardial Revascularization and Complete Arterial Bypass Grafting.冠状动脉疾病的治疗:心肌血运重建和完全动脉搭桥术的随机试验
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Apr;65(S 03):S167-S173. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1601375. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
7
Multiple arterial grafting confers survival advantage compared to percutaneous intervention with drug-eluting stents in multivessel coronary artery disease: A propensity score adjusted analysis.在多支冠状动脉疾病中,与药物洗脱支架经皮介入治疗相比,多动脉血管移植术具有生存优势:一项倾向评分调整分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2015;189:153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.059. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
8
Global risk classification and clinical SYNTAX (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXUS and cardiac surgery) score in patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical left main revascularization.在接受经皮或外科左主干血运重建的患者中,全球风险分类和临床 SYNTAX(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与紫杉醇和心脏手术之间的协同作用)评分。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Mar;4(3):287-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.10.013.
9
Long-term forecasting and comparison of mortality in the Evaluation of the Xience Everolimus Eluting Stent vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization (EXCEL) trial: prospective validation of the SYNTAX Score II.EXCEL 试验中依维莫司洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干血运重建效果的长期预测和死亡率比较:SYNTAX 评分 II 的前瞻性验证。
Eur Heart J. 2015 May 21;36(20):1231-41. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu518. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
10
The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study: 5-year follow-up of revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease.Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study:5 年随访:多血管病变糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术血运重建的比较。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010 Jan;11(1):26-33. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328330ea32.

本文引用的文献

1
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对三血管病变患者的比较:SYNTAX 试验的最终五年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 21;35(40):2821-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu213. Epub 2014 May 21.
2
Five-year outcomes in patients with left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in the synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery trial.在紫杉醇药物涂层支架与心脏搭桥术联合治疗左主干病变研究中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干病变患者的 5 年结果。
Circulation. 2014 Jun 10;129(23):2388-94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006689. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
3
Differential clinical outcomes after 1 year versus 5 years in a randomised comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents (the SORT OUT III study): a multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial.在随机比较佐他莫司洗脱和西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架的 1 年与 5 年临床结果差异(SORT OUT III 研究):一项多中心、开放标签、随机优效性试验。
Lancet. 2014 Jun 14;383(9934):2047-2056. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60405-0. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
4
Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.比较糖尿病患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013 Dec;1(4):317-28. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70089-5. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
5
Meta-analysis of 14 trials comparing bypass grafting vs drug-eluting stents in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.多血管病变糖尿病患者旁路移植与药物洗脱支架的 14 项试验的荟萃分析。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Apr;24(4):344-54. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
6
Fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery.冠状动脉旁路移植术的血流储备分数指导与血管造影指导。
Circulation. 2013 Sep 24;128(13):1405-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002740. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
7
Five-year outcomes following PCI with DES versus CABG for unprotected LM coronary lesions: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 2914 patients.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉病变的五年结局:2914例患者的荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2013 Mar;28(1):83-92. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20130013.
8
Five years after the SYNTAX trial: what have we learnt?SYNTAX 试验五年后:我们学到了什么?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jul;44(1):1-3. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt267. Epub 2013 May 14.
9
Bayesian methods affirm the use of percutaneous coronary intervention to improve survival in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease.贝叶斯方法肯定了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在改善无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者生存方面的应用。
Circulation. 2013 Jun 4;127(22):2177-85. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000646. Epub 2013 May 14.
10
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention in a 'real-world' setting: a comparative effectiveness study based on propensity score-matched cohorts.在真实世界环境中冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较效果研究:基于倾向评分匹配队列的比较研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jul;44(1):e16-24. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt197. Epub 2013 Apr 28.