• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PSA 在前列腺癌筛查中的应用:利大于弊还是弊大于利?

PSA in screening for prostate cancer: more good than harm or more harm than good?

出版信息

Adv Clin Chem. 2014;66:1-23.

PMID:25344984
Abstract

The aim of screening for prostate cancer is to detect malignancy at an early and potentially treatable stage, thereby increasing the chance of cure. Although serum PSA has been used as a screening test for prostate cancer for over 20 years, the practice is controversial. As a screening test for prostate cancer, PSA lacks sensitivity and specificity for early disease. Furthermore, screening may lead to unnecessary biopsies, overdetection, and overtreatment. It is thus unclear whether the benefits of screening outweigh the harms. Although published guidelines differ in their recommendation for PSA screening, almost all state that prior to PSA testing, men should be informed of the risks and benefits of the process. Most guidelines also state that men with a life expectancy of less than 10 years should not be screened. New markers currently undergoing evaluation such as -2proPSA, Prostate Health Index, and PCA3 may complement PSA in the detection of early prostate cancer.

摘要

前列腺癌筛查的目的是在早期发现并可能治疗恶性肿瘤,从而增加治愈的机会。尽管血清 PSA 已被用作前列腺癌筛查测试超过 20 年,但这种做法仍存在争议。作为前列腺癌的筛查测试,PSA 对早期疾病的敏感性和特异性不足。此外,筛查可能导致不必要的活检、过度检测和过度治疗。因此,尚不清楚筛查的益处是否超过危害。尽管已发布的指南在 PSA 筛查的推荐方面存在差异,但几乎所有指南都指出,在进行 PSA 检测之前,应告知男性该过程的风险和益处。大多数指南还指出,预期寿命不足 10 年的男性不应进行筛查。目前正在评估的新标志物,如 -2proPSA、前列腺健康指数和 PCA3,可能会在检测早期前列腺癌方面补充 PSA。

相似文献

1
PSA in screening for prostate cancer: more good than harm or more harm than good?PSA 在前列腺癌筛查中的应用:利大于弊还是弊大于利?
Adv Clin Chem. 2014;66:1-23.
2
Prostate-specific antigen: does the current evidence support its use in prostate cancer screening?前列腺特异性抗原:当前的证据是否支持其用于前列腺癌筛查?
Ann Clin Biochem. 2011 Jul;48(Pt 4):310-6. doi: 10.1258/acb.2011.010273. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
3
Optimizing prostate cancer screening; prospective randomized controlled study of the role of PSA and PCA3 testing in a sequential manner in an opportunistic screening program.优化前列腺癌筛查;在机会性筛查项目中对前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和前列腺癌基因3(PCA3)检测按序进行的作用的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Actas Urol Esp. 2014 May;38(4):217-23. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Oct 27.
4
[Focus on the screening for prostate cancer by PSA].[聚焦于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查前列腺癌]
Rev Med Brux. 2013 Sep;34(4):311-9.
5
Prostate specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update.前列腺特异性抗原最佳实践声明:2009年更新版
J Urol. 2009 Nov;182(5):2232-41. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.093. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
6
[PSA screening].[前列腺特异性抗原筛查]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2015 Sep;140(19):1435-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-102939. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
7
Should all colorectal cancer patients over age 60 be screened for prostate cancer?是否所有 60 岁以上的结直肠癌患者都应该接受前列腺癌筛查?
Oncology (Williston Park). 2013 Oct;27(10):1032-8.
8
[Clinical value of prostate specific antigen screening in early detection of prostate cancer].前列腺特异性抗原筛查在前列腺癌早期检测中的临床价值
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Sep;31(9):705-9.
9
Prostate specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update.前列腺特异性抗原最佳实践声明:2009 年更新。
J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1 Suppl):S2-S11. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.014.
10
PCA3 sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer detection in patients with abnormal PSA and/or suspicious digital rectal examination. First Latin American experience.PCA3 对 PSA 异常和/或可疑直肠指诊的前列腺癌患者的检测的敏感性和特异性。拉丁美洲的首次经验。
Urol Oncol. 2013 Nov;31(8):1522-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a three-miRNA panel in prostate cancer: a discovery and validation study.评估三种微小RNA组合在前列腺癌中的诊断价值:一项发现与验证研究。
Discov Oncol. 2025 Apr 25;16(1):611. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02382-w.
2
PSA testing in primary care: is it time to change our practice?基层医疗中的前列腺特异性抗原检测:是时候改变我们的做法了吗?
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Dec 26;25(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02688-8.
3
Integrated grade-wise profiling analysis reveals potential plasma miR-373-3p as prognostic indicator in Prostate Cancer & its target KPNA2.
综合分级剖析分析揭示了血浆中潜在的miR-373-3p作为前列腺癌预后指标及其靶标KPNA2。
Noncoding RNA Res. 2024 Apr 19;9(3):954-963. doi: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2024.04.004. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Therapeutic targeting of the androgen receptor (AR) and AR variants in prostate cancer.前列腺癌中雄激素受体(AR)及AR变体的治疗靶向作用
Asian J Urol. 2020 Jul;7(3):271-283. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
5
Prognostic Significance of Serum PSA Level and Telomerase, VEGF and GLUT-1 Protein Expression for the Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy.血清前列腺特异抗原(PSA)水平以及端粒酶、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)和葡萄糖转运蛋白1(GLUT-1)蛋白表达对前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的预后意义
Pathol Oncol Res. 2020 Apr;26(2):1049-1056. doi: 10.1007/s12253-019-00659-4. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
6
Modern urology perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers.现代泌尿学对前列腺癌生物标志物的观点。
Cent European J Urol. 2018;71(4):420-426. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2018.1762. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
7
Association between PSA and age in Macuxi ethnic population of the Brazilian Amazon forest region.巴西亚马逊森林地区马库希族人群中前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)与年龄之间的关联。
Res Rep Urol. 2018 Oct 10;10:159-168. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S149836. eCollection 2018.
8
Seminal Cell-Free DNA Assessment as a Novel Prostate Cancer Biomarker.精浆游离DNA评估作为一种新型前列腺癌生物标志物
Pathol Oncol Res. 2018 Oct;24(4):941-945. doi: 10.1007/s12253-018-0416-6. Epub 2018 May 5.
9
Socioeconomic determinants of prostate-specific antigen testing and estimation of the prevalence of undiagnosed prostate cancer in an elderly Polish population based on the PolSenior study.基于PolSenior研究的波兰老年人群中前列腺特异性抗原检测的社会经济决定因素及未诊断前列腺癌患病率的估计
Arch Med Sci. 2016 Oct 1;12(5):1028-1035. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2015.55271. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
10
The utility of urine-circulating miRNAs for detection of prostate cancer.尿液循环微RNA在前列腺癌检测中的应用
Br J Cancer. 2016 Sep 6;115(6):707-15. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.233. Epub 2016 Aug 4.