Karamouzian Saeid, Ebrahimi-Nejad Ali, Shahsavarani Shahram, Keikhosravi Ehsan, Shahba Mohsen, Ebrahimi Farzaneh
Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. ; Afzal Research Institute (NGO), Kerman, Iran.
Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Asian Spine J. 2014 Oct;8(5):646-52. doi: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.5.646. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
Prospective study.
We compared the effects of two methods of epidural steroid injection in patients with recurrent disc herniation.
To our knowledge, there is no previous report of such a comparison in these patients.
The study was performed with 30 patients with relapsed lumbar disc herniation whose pain was not relieved by conservative remedies. The patients were divided into two groups, each of 15 patients, and entered the study for caudal or transforaminal injections. The degree of pain, ability to stand and walk, and the Prolo function score were evaluated in both groups before the injection and 2 months and 6 months after the injection.
The degrees of pain reduction in the caudal injection group in the second and sixth months were 0.6 and 1.63, respectively, and in the transforaminal injection group were 1.33 and 1.56, respectively. The difference between the two methods was not statistically significant. Similarly, no other evaluated criterion showed a significant difference between the methods.
In the current study, the caudal and transforaminal steroid injection methods showed similar outcomes in the treatment of relapsed lumbar disc herniation. However, more detailed patient categorizing may help in finding possible subgroups with differences.
前瞻性研究。
我们比较了两种硬膜外类固醇注射方法对复发性椎间盘突出症患者的疗效。
据我们所知,此前尚无关于此类患者的比较报告。
对30例经保守治疗疼痛未缓解的复发性腰椎间盘突出症患者进行研究。将患者分为两组,每组15例,分别接受骶管注射或经椎间孔注射并进入研究。在注射前、注射后2个月和6个月对两组患者的疼痛程度、站立和行走能力以及普罗洛功能评分进行评估。
骶管注射组在第二个月和第六个月的疼痛减轻程度分别为0.6和1.63,经椎间孔注射组分别为1.33和1.56。两种方法之间的差异无统计学意义。同样,其他评估标准在两种方法之间也未显示出显著差异。
在本研究中,骶管和经椎间孔类固醇注射方法在复发性腰椎间盘突出症的治疗中显示出相似的结果。然而,更详细的患者分类可能有助于找到可能存在差异的亚组。