Suppr超能文献

可膨胀阴茎假体储液囊置于肌下高位与耻骨后间隙的比较:一项外科医生调查结果

High submuscular versus space of Retzius placement of inflatable penile prosthesis reservoirs: results of a surgeon survey.

作者信息

Tausch Timothy J, Morey Allen F, Zhao Lee C, Knoll Paul, Simhan Jay, Scott J Francis, Flemons James R, Wilson Steven K

机构信息

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Can J Urol. 2014 Oct;21(5):7465-9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

High submuscular (HSM) inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) reservoir insertion is a new technique that involves placing the reservoir high beneath the muscles of the abdominal wall. We queried a variety of surgeons to assess their impressions of how HSM reservoir placement compares with traditional space of Retzius (SOR) placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A nationwide group of urologists trained in HSM reservoir placement was surveyed to assess preferences and concerns compared to SOR placement. Using a Likert scale survey, we compared HSM to traditional SOR placement with regard to ease of implementation, surgical preference, and patient safety. Results were analyzed according to numbers of implants performed by the surgeons.

RESULTS

A total of 25 urologists from eight states participated in this survey (12 residents and 13 attending surgeons). Overall, surgeons report that HSM placement is safer (p < 0.001). The participants believed it conveyed lower risk to visceral (p < 0.001) and vascular (p < 0.001) structures. Moreover it was easier to learn (p = 0.008) and to teach (p = 0.002). The majority (17/25, 68%) prefer HSM reservoir placement, while 4/25 (16%) are neutral, and 4/25 (16%) prefer SOR. Among high volume implanters (> 20 implants/year), 7/9 (78%) prefer the HSM technique and report that it is safer (p = 0.001) with lower risk of visceral (p = 0.010) and vascular (p < 0.001) injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Urologists trained in HSM reservoir placement report that this technique is readily implemented, strongly preferred, and safer for patients.

摘要

引言

高位肌下(HSM)可膨胀阴茎假体(IPP)储液器植入是一种新技术,即将储液器置于腹壁肌肉下方较高位置。我们询问了多位外科医生,以评估他们对HSM储液器放置与传统耻骨后间隙(SOR)放置的看法。

材料与方法

对一组在全国范围内接受过HSM储液器植入培训的泌尿科医生进行调查,以评估与SOR放置相比他们的偏好和关注点。通过李克特量表调查,我们比较了HSM与传统SOR放置在实施难易程度、手术偏好和患者安全性方面的差异。根据外科医生进行植入手术的数量对结果进行分析。

结果

来自八个州的25位泌尿科医生参与了此次调查(12名住院医生和13名主治医生)。总体而言,外科医生报告称HSM放置更安全(p < 0.001)。参与者认为它对内脏(p < 0.001)和血管(p < 0.001)结构造成的风险更低。此外,它更容易学习(p = 0.008)和教授(p = 0.002)。大多数人(17/25,68%)更喜欢HSM储液器放置,而4/25(16%)持中立态度,4/25(16%)更喜欢SOR。在高植入量医生(每年>20例植入手术)中,7/9(78%)更喜欢HSM技术,并报告称其更安全(p = 0.001),内脏(p = 0.010)和血管(p < 0.001)损伤风险更低。

结论

接受过HSM储液器植入培训的泌尿科医生报告称,该技术易于实施,深受青睐,且对患者更安全。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验