Capoccia Edward M, Phelps Jessica N, Levine Laurence A
Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Sex Med. 2017 Jul;14(7):968-973. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
Traditional inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) reservoir placement has rare but potentially serious complications including damage to local structures, and Levine and Hoeh (J Sex Med 2012;9:2759-2769) described a modified technique designed to avoid these complications.
To determine whether the modified Jorgenson scissors technique is safe and effective in patients who have had prior pelvic surgery.
A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who had a three-piece IPP placed by a single urologist from 2011 to 2015. Complication rates between the prior pelvic surgery group and the virgin pelvis group were compared using χ test. Differences between the two groups were considered statistically significant at a P value less than .05.
Reservoir-related complication rate and rate of converting to ectopic placement.
A total of 246 procedures were included, with 174 having no prior pelvic surgery and 72 with prior pelvic surgery. The reservoir-related complication rates were 2.8% (2 of 72) in the prior pelvic surgery group and 3.4% (6 of 174) in the virgin pelvis group. This difference was not statistically significant (P = .79). The two complications from the prior pelvic surgery cohort were inguinal hernias requiring surgical repair, which occurred in the same patient. In the virgin pelvis cohort, there were five inguinal hernias and one autoinflation. There were 16 patients who required ectopic placement of the reservoir owing to difficulty in entering the space of Retzius (SOR), 14 of whom had prior pelvic surgery.
We believe this modified technique for IPP reservoir placement into the SOR is a safe alternative because the Jorgenson scissors allow perforation into the SOR away from vital structures.
The study is limited by the fact that it is a retrospective, single-center, chart review of a non-randomized surgical procedure with variable follow-up in a limited number of patients. Its strength is its applicability to provide surgeons a modified technique that can be used routinely for IPP reservoir placement that appears to be safe and effective, even in men who have had prior pelvic surgery.
In our experience, the modified Jorgenson scissors technique allows for safe entry into the SOR through a transverse scrotal incision and is a viable alternative to the standard SOR placement and the ectopic approach. Capoccia EM, Phelps JN, Levine LA. Modified Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Reservoir Placement Into Space of Retzius: Comparing Outcomes in Men With or Without Prior Pelvic Surgery. J Sex Med 2017;14:968-973.
传统的可膨胀阴茎假体(IPP)储液囊放置术虽有罕见但潜在严重的并发症,包括局部结构损伤,Levine和Hoeh(《性医学杂志》2012年;9:2759 - 2769)描述了一种改良技术以避免这些并发症。
确定改良的约根森剪刀技术在既往有盆腔手术史的患者中是否安全有效。
对2011年至2015年由单一泌尿外科医生进行三件式IPP植入的所有患者进行回顾性病历审查。使用χ检验比较既往盆腔手术组和未行盆腔手术组的并发症发生率。两组间差异在P值小于0.05时被认为具有统计学意义。
储液囊相关并发症发生率和转为异位放置的发生率。
共纳入246例手术,其中174例无既往盆腔手术史,72例有既往盆腔手术史。既往盆腔手术组储液囊相关并发症发生率为2.8%(72例中的2例),未行盆腔手术组为3.4%(174例中的6例)。差异无统计学意义(P = 0.79)。既往盆腔手术队列中的两例并发症为腹股沟疝,需手术修复,发生在同一患者。在未行盆腔手术队列中,有5例腹股沟疝和1例自动膨胀。有16例患者因进入Retzius间隙困难(SOR)而需要将储液囊异位放置,其中14例有既往盆腔手术史。
我们认为这种将IPP储液囊置入SOR的改良技术是一种安全的替代方法,因为约根森剪刀可在远离重要结构处穿孔进入SOR。
本研究受限于其为回顾性、单中心、对非随机手术操作的病历审查,随访情况不一且患者数量有限。其优点在于它的适用性,能为外科医生提供一种改良技术,可常规用于IPP储液囊放置,即使在有既往盆腔手术史的男性中似乎也安全有效。
根据我们的经验,改良的约根森剪刀技术可通过阴囊横切口安全进入SOR,是标准SOR放置和异位放置方法的可行替代方案。Capoccia EM,Phelps JN,Levine LA。改良可膨胀阴茎假体储液囊置入Retzius间隙:比较有或无既往盆腔手术史男性的结果。《性医学杂志》2017年;14:968 - 973。