Katidioti Ioanna, Borst Jelmer P, Taatgen Niels A
Department of Artificial Intelligence.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2014 Dec;20(4):380-396. doi: 10.1037/xap0000031. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
Interruption studies typically focus on external interruptions, even though self-interruptions occur at least as often in real work environments. In this article, we therefore contrast external interruptions with self-interruptions. Three multitasking experiments were conducted, in which we examined changes in pupil size when participants switched from a primary to a secondary task. Results showed an increase in pupil dilation several seconds before a self-interruption, which we could attribute to the decision to switch. This indicates that the decision takes a relatively large amount of time. This was supported by the fact that in Experiment 2, participants were significantly slower on the self-interruption blocks than on the external interruption blocks. These findings suggest that the decision to switch is costly, but may also be open for modification through appropriate training. In addition, we propose that if one must switch tasks, it can be more efficient to implement a forced switch after the completion of a subtask instead of leaving the decision to the user.
中断研究通常关注外部中断,尽管在实际工作环境中自我中断至少同样频繁地发生。因此,在本文中,我们将外部中断与自我中断进行了对比。我们进行了三项多任务实验,在实验中我们观察了参与者从主要任务切换到次要任务时瞳孔大小的变化。结果显示,在自我中断前几秒瞳孔扩张增加,我们将其归因于切换的决定。这表明做出决定需要相对较长的时间。实验2中参与者在自我中断组的速度明显慢于外部中断组,这一事实支持了这一点。这些发现表明,切换的决定成本高昂,但也可能通过适当的训练进行调整。此外,我们建议,如果必须切换任务,在子任务完成后强制切换可能比让用户自行决定更有效。