*Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; †Suzanne Bruce and Associates, PA, Houston, Texas; ‡Department of Dermatology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; §The Private Clinic, Glasgow, United Kingdom; ‖Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; ¶Aesthetic Solutions, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; #Scientific Communications and Information, Parsippany, New Jersey; **Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California; and ††Kythera Biopharmaceuticals Inc., Calabasas, California; and ‡‡Department of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Dermatol Surg. 2014 Nov;40(11):1181-90. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000128.
This study was part of a Phase 3 program treating crow's feet lines (CFL) with onabotulinumtoxinA.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment of CFL.
This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 5-month study randomized subjects with moderate-to-severe CFL (maximum smile) to onabotulinumtoxinA (24 U; n = 222) or placebo (n = 223). Investigators and subjects assessed CFL severity (maximum smile and rest) using the 4-grade Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS). Co-primary end points were investigator- and subject-assessed proportion of subjects achieving a CFL FWS grade of 0 (none) or 1 (mild) at maximum smile (Day 30). Additional efficacy end points, patient-reported outcomes, and safety/adverse events (AEs) were evaluated.
All primary and secondary end points were achieved; statistically significant differences favored onabotulinumtoxinA (p < .001, all comparisons vs placebo). Co-primary responder rates were 66.7% compared with 6.7% for investigator-assessed and 58.1% compared with 5.4% for subject-assessed response (onabotulinumtoxinA group and placebo, respectively; p < .001). A significantly greater proportion of the onabotulinumtoxinA group than placebo group achieved a 1 grade or greater improvement on the FWS (maximum smile and rest assessed by both the investigator and subject; all time points; p < .001). Most AEs were mild or moderate and did not result in discontinuations.
Treatment of moderate-to-severe CFL with onabotulinumtoxinA was effective and well tolerated.
本研究是一项评估肉毒毒素 A 治疗鱼尾纹的 3 期临床试验的一部分。
评估肉毒毒素 A 治疗鱼尾纹的疗效和安全性。
这项多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、5 个月的研究将中重度鱼尾纹(最大微笑时)的受试者随机分为肉毒毒素 A(24U;n=222)或安慰剂(n=223)组。研究者和受试者采用 4 级面部皱纹量表(FWS)评估鱼尾纹严重程度(最大微笑和休息时)。主要疗效终点为最大微笑时研究者和受试者评估的达到鱼尾纹 FWS 0 级(无)或 1 级(轻度)的受试者比例。其他疗效终点、患者报告的结局和安全性/不良事件(AE)也进行了评估。
所有主要和次要终点均达到,肉毒毒素 A 均明显优于安慰剂(p<0.001,与安慰剂比较)。主要应答率为 66.7%,研究者评估和受试者评估分别为 6.7%和 58.1%(肉毒毒素 A 组和安慰剂组,均 p<0.001)。与安慰剂组相比,肉毒毒素 A 组在 FWS 上(研究者和受试者评估的最大微笑和休息时)有更大比例的患者获得 1 级或更明显的改善(所有时间点,p<0.001)。大多数 AE 为轻度或中度,且未导致停药。
肉毒毒素 A 治疗中重度鱼尾纹有效且耐受性良好。