• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CT 血管造影参数与休克指数的相关性评估主动脉夹层患者转运风险。

Correlation of computed tomography angiography parameters and shock index to assess the transportation risk in aortic dissection patients.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, North China Petroleum Bureau General Hospital, Renqiu, 062552, Hebei, China,

出版信息

Radiol Med. 2015 Apr;120(4):386-92. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0463-3. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1007/s11547-014-0463-3
PMID:25348137
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aortic dissection (AD) is a serious, life-threatening disease. It is currently crucial for AD patients to be transferred to a specialised hospital in a safe and timely manner. For this reason, the search for clinical and imaging changes related to transportation risk is becoming increasingly important.

PURPOSE

The transportation risks of AD patients were assessed by studying the correlation between computed tomography angiography (CTA) parameters and shock index.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six cases of AD confirmed with 64-slice volumetric CT (VCT) (18 cases of Stanford type A and 18 cases of type B) were divided into a high-risk group (14 cases, six Stanford type A and eight type B) and a low-risk group (22 cases, 12 Stanford type A and 10 type B) according to the modified Early Warning Score. The shock index (ratio of heart rate to systolic blood pressure) and measured CTA parameters were compared between the high-risk group and the low-risk group, and the correlation between the measured CTA parameters and shock index was analysed.

RESULTS

The shock index and ratio of false/true lumen were compared between Stanford type A and type B, and no statistically significant differences were found. The shock index and ratio of false/true lumen were compared between the high-risk group and low-risk group, revealing a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Moreover, a significant linear correlation was found between the ratio of false/true lumen and the shock index (r = 0.691; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The higher the shock index and the ratio of false/true lumen are, the greater the transportation risk for AD patients. The shock index and the ratio of false/true lumen proved to be essential clinical and radiological indices for assessing the transportation risk of AD patients.

摘要

背景

主动脉夹层(AD)是一种严重的、危及生命的疾病。目前,对于 AD 患者来说,关键是要安全、及时地转往专门的医院。出于这个原因,寻找与转运风险相关的临床和影像学变化变得越来越重要。

目的

通过研究 CT 血管造影(CTA)参数与休克指数之间的相关性,评估 AD 患者的转运风险。

材料与方法

将 36 例经 64 层容积 CT(VCT)证实的 AD 患者(18 例 Stanford 型 A,18 例 Stanford 型 B)根据改良早期预警评分分为高危组(14 例,6 例 Stanford 型 A,8 例 Stanford 型 B)和低危组(22 例,12 例 Stanford 型 A,10 例 Stanford 型 B)。比较高危组与低危组之间的休克指数(心率与收缩压之比)和测量的 CTA 参数,并分析测量的 CTA 参数与休克指数之间的相关性。

结果

Stanford 型 A 与型 B 之间比较休克指数和真假腔比值,无统计学差异。高危组与低危组之间比较休克指数和真假腔比值,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。而且,真假腔比值与休克指数之间存在显著的线性相关性(r=0.691;p=0.001)。

结论

休克指数和真假腔比值越高,AD 患者的转运风险越大。休克指数和真假腔比值是评估 AD 患者转运风险的重要临床和影像学指标。

相似文献

1
Correlation of computed tomography angiography parameters and shock index to assess the transportation risk in aortic dissection patients.CT 血管造影参数与休克指数的相关性评估主动脉夹层患者转运风险。
Radiol Med. 2015 Apr;120(4):386-92. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0463-3. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
2
[Relationship between multi-slice spiral CT angiography imaging features and in-hospital death of patients with aortic dissection].[多层螺旋CT血管造影成像特征与主动脉夹层患者院内死亡的关系]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Mar 24;45(3):217-222. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.03.009.
3
A new method for quantification of false lumen thrombosis in aortic dissection using magnetic resonance imaging and a blood pool contrast agent.一种使用磁共振成像和血池对比剂定量主动脉夹层假腔血栓形成的新方法。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1251-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.022. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
4
Can multiphase dynamic CT angiography provide a better assessment of aortic dissection compared with the standard triphasic protocol?与标准三相方案相比,多期动态CT血管造影能否更好地评估主动脉夹层?
Acta Radiol. 2018 Jan;59(1):58-64. doi: 10.1177/0284185117704236. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
5
Aortic remodeling after endovascular repair with stainless steel-based stent graft in acute and chronic type B aortic dissection.不锈钢基支架移植物腔内修复急性和慢性 B 型主动脉夹层后的主动脉重塑。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jun;55(6):1600-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
6
Comparison of outcome in aortic dissection with single false lumen versus multiple false lumens: CT assessment.主动脉夹层单假腔与多假腔预后的比较:CT 评估。
Radiology. 2013 May;267(2):368-75. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12121274. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
7
[Dual-source computed tomographic angiography using triple-rule-out protocols in combination with abdominal computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of aortic dissection].使用三联排除方案的双源计算机断层血管造影联合腹部计算机断层血管造影评估主动脉夹层
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2010 Dec;32(6):666-70. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000.503X.2010.06.016.
8
Aortic diameter, true lumen, and false lumen growth rates in chronic type B aortic dissection.慢性B型主动脉夹层的主动脉直径、真腔和假腔增长率
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 May;192(5):W222-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3986.
9
Volumetric analysis of type B aortic dissections treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair.胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗 B 型主动脉夹层的容量分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Oct;54(4):985-92; discussion 992. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.263. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
10
Aortic dissection: diagnosis and follow-up with helical CT.主动脉夹层:螺旋CT诊断与随访
Radiographics. 1999 Jan-Feb;19(1):45-60; quiz 149-50. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.19.1.g99ja0945.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimated glomerular filtration rate as one of the main predictors of in-hospital mortality in Egyptian patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction: a two-year retrospective study.估计肾小球滤过率作为埃及ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者院内死亡的主要预测因素之一:一项为期两年的回顾性研究
Egypt Heart J. 2020 Jun 1;72(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s43044-020-00067-z.
2
The use of the shock index to predict hemodynamic collapse in hypotensive sepsis patients: A cross-sectional analysis.使用休克指数预测低血压脓毒症患者的血流动力学崩溃:一项横断面分析。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2020 Apr-Jun;14(2):192-199. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_780_19. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Age- and sex-specific normal values for shock index in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2008 for ages 8 years and older.1999-2008 年全国健康与营养调查中年龄在 8 岁及以上人群休克指数的年龄和性别特异性正常值。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 May;31(5):838-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.01.014. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
2
Predicting the risk for acute type B aortic dissection in hypertensive patients using anatomic variables.使用解剖学变量预测高血压患者发生急性 B 型主动脉夹层的风险。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Mar;6(3):349-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.07.018. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
3
[Successful prehospital diagnosis secures fast and correct treatment of acute aorta dissection].
[成功的院前诊断确保急性主动脉夹层的快速和正确治疗]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2013 Jan 21;175(4):209-10.
4
[Pathoanatomic criteria for dissecting aortic aneurysm].[主动脉夹层动脉瘤的病理解剖学标准]
Arkh Patol. 2012 Sep-Oct;74(5):12-7.
5
Optimising fast track care for proximal femoral fracture patients using modified early warning score.使用改良早期预警评分优化股骨近端骨折患者的快速通道护理。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012 May;94(4):267-71. doi: 10.1308/003588412X13171221501744.
6
Aortic dissection and malperfusion syndrome: a when, what and how-to guide.主动脉夹层与灌注不良综合征:何时、何种情况下发生,以及如何处理。
Radiol Med. 2013 Feb;118(1):74-88. doi: 10.1007/s11547-012-0815-9. Epub 2012 Apr 1.
7
MDCT in diagnosing acute aortic syndromes: reviewing common and less common CT findings.MDCT 诊断急性主动脉综合征:常见和不常见 CT 表现的综述。
Radiol Med. 2012 Apr;117(3):393-409. doi: 10.1007/s11547-011-0747-9. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
8
Management of acute aortic syndromes.急性主动脉综合征的管理。
Eur Heart J. 2012 Jan;33(1):26-35b. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr186. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
9
Analysis of 287 patients with aortic dissection: general characteristics, outcomes and risk factors in a single center.287例主动脉夹层患者的分析:单中心的一般特征、结局及危险因素
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2011 Feb;31(1):107-113. doi: 10.1007/s11596-011-0160-6. Epub 2011 Feb 19.
10
Identifying risk for massive transfusion in the relatively normotensive patient: utility of the prehospital shock index.识别相对血压正常患者大量输血的风险:院前休克指数的效用
J Trauma. 2011 Feb;70(2):384-8; discussion 388-90. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182095a0a.