Scanavino Marco de T, Ventuneac Ana, Rendina H Jonathon, Abdo Carmita H N, Tavares Hermano, Amaral Maria L S do, Messina Bruna, Reis Sirlene C dos, Martins João P L B, Gordon Marina C, Vieira Julie C, Parsons Jeffrey T
Department and Institute of Psychiatry (IPq), Clínicas' Hospital (HC), University of São Paulo Medical School (FMUSP), Sao Paulo, Brazil.
, Rua Mato Grosso, 306, conj. 614, Sao Paulo, SP, 01239-040, Brazil.
Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Jan;45(1):207-17. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0356-5. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
Epidemiological, behavioral, and clinical data on sexual compulsivity in Brazil are very limited. This study sought to adapt and validate the Sexual Compulsivity Scale (SCS), the 22-item version of the Compulsive Sexual Behavior Inventory (CSBI-22), and the Hypersexual Disorder Screening Inventory (HDSI) for use in Brazil. A total of 153 participants underwent psychiatric assessment and completed self-reported measures. The adaptation process of the instruments from English to Portuguese followed the guidelines of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. The reliability and validity of the HDSI criteria were evaluated and the construct validity of all measures was examined. For the SCS and HDSI, factor analysis revealed one factor for each measure. For the CSBI-22, four factors were retained although we only calculated the scores of two factors (control and violence). All scores had good internal consistency (alpha >.75), presented high temporal stability (>.76), discriminated between patients and controls, and presented strong (ρ > .81) correlations with the Sexual Addiction Screening Test (except for the violence domain = .40) and moderate correlations with the Impulsive Sensation Seeking domain of the Zuckerman Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ρ between .43 and .55). The sensitivity of the HDSI was 71.93 % and the specificity was 100 %. All measures showed very good psychometric properties. The SCS, the HDSI, and the control domain of the CSBI-22 seemed to measure theoretically similar constructs, as they were highly correlated (ρ > .85). The findings support the conceptualization of hypersexuality as a cluster of problematic symptoms that are highly consistent across a variety of measures.
巴西有关性强迫行为的流行病学、行为学和临床数据非常有限。本研究旨在对性强迫量表(SCS)、强迫性行为量表22项版(CSBI - 22)和性亢进障碍筛查量表(HDSI)进行改编和验证,以便在巴西使用。共有153名参与者接受了精神科评估并完成了自我报告测量。这些工具从英文到葡萄牙文的改编过程遵循了国际药物经济学和结果研究协会的指南。评估了HDSI标准的信度和效度,并检验了所有测量工具的结构效度。对于SCS和HDSI,因子分析显示每个测量工具各有一个因子。对于CSBI - 22,保留了四个因子,不过我们只计算了其中两个因子(控制和暴力)的得分。所有得分都具有良好的内部一致性(α>.75),呈现出较高的时间稳定性(>.76),能够区分患者和对照组,并且与性成瘾筛查测试呈现出强相关性(ρ>.81,暴力领域除外,ρ = 0.40),与祖克曼 - 库尔曼人格问卷的冲动感觉寻求领域呈现出中度相关性(ρ在0.43至0.55之间)。HDSI的敏感性为71.93%,特异性为100%。所有测量工具都显示出非常好的心理测量特性。SCS、HDSI和CSBI - 22的控制领域似乎测量的是理论上相似的结构,因为它们高度相关(ρ>.85)。这些研究结果支持将性亢进概念化为一系列问题症状的集群,这些症状在各种测量工具中高度一致。