Clinical Psychology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Sex Med Rev. 2017 Apr;5(2):146-162. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
Despite the rejection of hypersexual disorder (HD) as a new diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), clinical and research interest in HD continues.
To systematically review the existing scientific literature on the conceptualization and assessment of HD and out-of-control sexual behavior.
Studies were identified from PsychInfo, PubMed, JSTOR, Google Scholar, and Scholar's Portal using an exhaustive list of key terms. Of 299 total articles identified and screened, 252 were excluded, and 47 are included in this review.
To review two categories of articles: HD conceptualization and HD psychometric assessment.
First, results of the review of theoretical conceptualizations of HD reflected a large proportion of the peer-reviewed literature devoted to discussing conceptualizations of HD without reaching consensus. Second, results of the review of HD psychometric assessments were analyzed using Hunsley and Mash's (2008) criteria to evaluate psychometric adequacy of evidence-based assessment measurements. The six most researched measurements of HD were evaluated, including the Hypersexual Disorder Screening Inventory, the Hypersexual Behavior Inventory, the Sexual Compulsivity Scale, the Sexual Addiction Screening Test, the Sexual Addiction Screening Test-Revised, and the Compulsive Sexual Behavior Inventory. Psychometric properties of the scales are reviewed, evaluated, and discussed.
The Hypersexual Disorder Screening Inventory, the measurement proposed for the clinical screening of HD by the DSM-5 workgroup, currently has the strongest psychometric support. Future research and clinical directions are discussed in light of findings after the literature review and synthesis. Montgomery-Graham S. Conceptualization and Assessment of Hypersexual Disorder: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Sex Med Rev 2017;5:146-162.
尽管在《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版（DSM-5）中，性欲亢进障碍（HD）被拒绝作为一个新的诊断，但临床和研究对 HD 的兴趣仍在继续。
系统回顾关于 HD 和失控性行为的概念化和评估的现有科学文献。
使用详尽的关键词列表，从 PsychInfo、PubMed、JSTOR、Google Scholar 和 Scholar's Portal 中搜索研究。在总共确定和筛选的 299 篇文章中，排除了 252 篇，有 47 篇被纳入本综述。
审查两类文章：HD 概念化和 HD 心理计量评估。
首先，对 HD 理论概念化的综述结果反映了很大一部分同行评议文献致力于讨论 HD 的概念化，但没有达成共识。其次，使用 Hunsley 和 Mash（2008）的标准分析了 HD 心理计量评估的结果，以评估基于证据的评估测量的心理计量充分性。评估了 HD 研究最多的六种测量方法，包括性欲亢进障碍筛查量表、性欲亢进行为量表、性强迫量表、性成瘾筛查测试、性成瘾筛查测试修订版和强迫性性行为量表。审查、评估和讨论了这些量表的心理计量特性。
目前，《性欲亢进障碍筛查量表》作为 DSM-5 工作组提出的 HD 临床筛查的测量方法，具有最强的心理计量支持。根据文献综述和综合的结果，讨论了未来的研究和临床方向。蒙哥马利-格雷厄姆 S.性欲亢进障碍的概念化和评估：文献系统回顾。性医学评论 2017；5：146-162。
