Suppr超能文献

丹麦哥本哈根一家受监管注射设施开放后自我报告的药物使用行为和注射器处置方法的变化。

Self-reported changes in drug use behaviors and syringe disposal methods following the opening of a supervised injecting facility in Copenhagen, Denmark.

作者信息

Kinnard Elizabeth N, Howe Chanelle J, Kerr Thomas, Skjødt Hass Vibeke, Marshall Brandon D L

机构信息

Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 South Main Street, Box G-S-121-4, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

出版信息

Harm Reduct J. 2014 Oct 28;11(1):29. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-11-29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Denmark, the first standalone supervised injecting facility (SIF) opened in Copenhagen's Vesterbro neighborhood on October 1, 2012. The purpose of this study was to assess whether use of services provided by the recently opened SIF was associated with changes in injecting behavior and syringe disposal practices among people who inject drugs (PWID). We hypothesized that risk behaviors (e.g., syringe sharing), and unsafe syringe disposal (e.g., dropping used equipment on the ground) had decreased among PWID utilizing the SIF.

METHODS

Between February and August of 2013, we conducted interviews using a survey (in English and Danish) with forty-one people who reported injecting drugs at the SIF. We used descriptive statistics and McNemar's test to examine sociodemographic characteristics of the sample, current drugs used, sites of syringe disposal before and after opening of the SIF, and perceived behavior change since using the SIF.

RESULTS

Of the interviewed participants, 90.2% were male and the majority were younger than 40 years old (60.9%). Three-quarters (75.6%) of participants reported reductions in injection risk behaviors since the opening of the SIF, such as injecting in a less rushed manner (63.4%), fewer outdoor injections (56.1%), no longer syringe sharing (53.7%), and cleaning injecting site(s) more often (43.9%). Approximately two-thirds (65.9%) of participants did not feel that their frequency of injecting had changed; five participants (12.2%) reported a decrease in injecting frequency, and only two participants (4.9%) reported an increase in injecting frequency. Twenty-four (58.5%) individuals reported changing their syringe disposal practices since the opening of the SIF; of those, twenty-three (95.8%) reported changing from not always disposing safely to always disposing safely (McNemar's test p-value < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that use of the Copenhagen SIF is associated with adoption of safer behaviors that reduce harm and promote health among PWID, as well as practices that benefit the Vesterbro neighborhood (i.e., safer syringe disposal). As a public health intervention, Copenhagen's SIF has successfully reached PWID engaging in risk behavior. To fully characterize the impacts of this and other Danish SIFs, further research should replicate this study with a larger sample size and prospective follow-up.

摘要

背景

在丹麦,首个独立的监督注射设施(SIF)于2012年10月1日在哥本哈根的韦斯特布罗区开业。本研究的目的是评估使用最近开业的SIF所提供的服务是否与注射吸毒者(PWID)的注射行为和注射器处置方式的变化有关。我们假设,在使用SIF的PWID中,危险行为(如共用注射器)和不安全的注射器处置(如将用过的设备扔在地上)有所减少。

方法

2013年2月至8月期间,我们使用一份调查问卷(英文和丹麦文)对41名报告在SIF注射毒品的人进行了访谈。我们使用描述性统计和麦克尼马尔检验来检查样本的社会人口学特征、当前使用的毒品、SIF开业前后注射器的处置地点,以及自使用SIF以来感知到的行为变化。

结果

在接受访谈的参与者中,90.2%为男性,大多数年龄小于40岁(60.9%)。四分之三(75.6%)的参与者报告称,自SIF开业以来,注射危险行为有所减少,比如注射时不再那么匆忙(63.4%)、户外注射次数减少(56.1%)、不再共用注射器(53.7%),以及更频繁地清洁注射部位(43.9%)。约三分之二(65.9%)的参与者认为他们的注射频率没有变化;5名参与者(12.2%)报告注射频率降低,只有2名参与者(4.9%)报告注射频率增加。24名(58.5%)个体报告自SIF开业以来改变了他们的注射器处置方式;其中,23名(95.8%)报告从并非总是安全处置变为总是安全处置(麦克尼马尔检验p值<0.001)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,使用哥本哈根的SIF与采取更安全的行为相关,这些行为可减少危害并促进PWID的健康,同时也有利于韦斯特布罗区(即更安全的注射器处置)。作为一项公共卫生干预措施,哥本哈根的SIF已成功覆盖从事危险行为的PWID。为全面描述该设施及丹麦其他SIF的影响,进一步的研究应以更大的样本量和前瞻性随访重复本研究。

相似文献

2
Changes in injecting practices associated with the use of a medically supervised safer injection facility.
J Public Health (Oxf). 2007 Mar;29(1):35-9. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdl090. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
3
Injection drug users' perceptions regarding use of a medically supervised safer injecting facility.
Addict Behav. 2007 May;32(5):1088-93. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.07.013. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
4
Perceptions about supervised injection facilities among people who inject drugs in Philadelphia.
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Feb;52:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
5
Trends in sources and sharing of needles among people who inject drugs, San Francisco, 2005-2012.
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Dec;26(12):1238-43. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
6
Supervised injection facility use and all-cause mortality among people who inject drugs in Vancouver, Canada: A cohort study.
PLoS Med. 2019 Nov 26;16(11):e1002964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002964. eCollection 2019 Nov.
8

引用本文的文献

1
Four decades of overdose prevention centres: lessons for the future from a realist review.
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Mar 20;22(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01178-z.
2
Overdose prevention centres as spaces of safety, trust and inclusion: A causal pathway based on a realist review.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2024 Sep;43(6):1573-1591. doi: 10.1111/dar.13908. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
4
Client experiences using a new supervised consumption service in Sudbury, Ontario: A qualitative study.
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 16;18(10):e0292862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292862. eCollection 2023.
5
Drug Consumption Rooms: Welfare State and Diversity in Social Acceptance in Denmark and in France.
Am J Public Health. 2022 Apr;112(S2):S159-S165. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306808.
6
Assessing Drug Consumption Rooms and Longer Term (5 Year) Impacts on Community and Clients.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Nov 15;14:4639-4647. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S244720. eCollection 2021.
7
Supervised injection facility use and exposure to violence among a cohort of people who inject drugs: A gender-based analysis.
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Apr;78:102692. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102692. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
Supervised injection facility use and all-cause mortality among people who inject drugs in Vancouver, Canada: A cohort study.
PLoS Med. 2019 Nov 26;16(11):e1002964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002964. eCollection 2019 Nov.
10
: The Provision of Injection Drug Use Initiation Assistance in a High-Risk U.S.-Mexico Border Region.
Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(14):2338-2350. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1648514. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

2
Police and public health partnerships: evidence from the evaluation of Vancouver's supervised injection facility.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2008 May 7;3:11. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-3-11.
3
Public injection settings in Vancouver: physical environment, social context and risk.
Int J Drug Policy. 2007 Jan;18(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.11.019. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
5
Public injecting and the need for 'safer environment interventions' in the reduction of drug-related harm.
Addiction. 2006 Oct;101(10):1384-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01556.x.
6
Insite: Canada's landmark safe injecting program at risk.
Harm Reduct J. 2006 Aug 9;3:24. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-3-24.
8
Do supervised injecting facilities attract higher-risk injection drug users?
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Aug;29(2):126-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.04.011.
10
Drug consumption facilities: an update since 2000.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2003 Jun;22(2):227-33. doi: 10.1080/095952301000116951.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验