Kneip Thorsten, Bauer Gerrit, Reinhold Steffen
Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA), Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Amalienstr. 33, 80799, Munich, Germany,
Demography. 2014 Dec;51(6):2103-26. doi: 10.1007/s13524-014-0337-2.
Previous research examining the impact of unilateral divorce law (UDL) on the prevalence of divorce has provided mixed results. Studies based on cross-sectional cross-country/cross-state survey data have received criticism for disregarding unobserved heterogeneity across countries, as have studies using country-level panel data for failing to account for possible mediating mechanisms at the micro level. We seek to overcome both shortcomings by using individual-level event-history data from 11 European countries (SHARELIFE) and controlling for unobserved heterogeneity over countries and cohorts. We find that UDL in total increased the incidence of marital breakdown by about 20 %. This finding, however, neglects potential selection effects into marriage. Accordingly, the estimated effect of unilateral divorce laws becomes much larger when we control for age at marriage, which is used as indicator for match quality. Moreover, we find that UDL particularly affects marital stability in the presence of children.
以往关于单方面离婚法(UDL)对离婚率影响的研究结果不一。基于跨国/跨州横截面调查数据的研究因忽视各国未观察到的异质性而受到批评,使用国家层面面板数据的研究也因未能考虑微观层面可能的中介机制而受到批评。我们试图通过使用来自11个欧洲国家的个人层面事件史数据(SHARELIFE)并控制各国和各队列未观察到的异质性来克服这两个缺点。我们发现,单方面离婚法总体上使婚姻破裂的发生率增加了约20%。然而,这一发现忽略了婚姻中的潜在选择效应。因此,当我们控制结婚年龄(作为匹配质量的指标)时,单方面离婚法的估计效应会变得大得多。此外,我们发现,在有子女的情况下,单方面离婚法对婚姻稳定性的影响尤为显著。