Collins Katherine A, Mendelsohn Avi, Cain Christopher K, Schiller Daniela
Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai, New York, New York 10029.
Emotional Brain Institute, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York 10962, and Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016.
J Neurosci. 2014 Oct 29;34(44):14733-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2152-14.2014.
The ability to take action in the face of threat is highly diverse across individuals. What are the neural processes that determine individual differences in the ability to cope with danger? We hypothesized that the extent of synchronization between amygdala, striatum, and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) would predict successful active coping performance. To test this, we developed a novel computer task based on the principals of Sidman avoidance. Healthy human participants learned through trial and error to move a marker between virtual game board compartments once every 3 s to avoid mild shocks. Behaviorally, participants exhibited large individual differences. Strikingly, both amygdala-mPFC and caudate-mPFC coupling during active coping trials covaried with final active coping performance across participants. These findings indicate that synchronization between mPFC subregions, and both amygdala and caudate predicts whether individuals will achieve successful active coping performance by the end of training. Thus, successful performance of adaptive actions in the face of threat requires functional synchronization of a neural circuit consisting of mPFC, striatum, and amygdala. Malfunction in the crosstalk between these components might underlie anxiety symptoms and impair individuals' ability to actively cope under stress. This opens an array of possibilities for therapeutic targets for fear and anxiety disorders.
面对威胁时采取行动的能力在个体之间存在很大差异。决定应对危险能力个体差异的神经过程是什么?我们假设杏仁核、纹状体和内侧前额叶皮质(mPFC)之间的同步程度将预测成功的积极应对表现。为了验证这一点,我们基于西德曼回避原则开发了一项新颖的计算机任务。健康的人类参与者通过试错学习,每3秒在虚拟游戏板隔层之间移动一个标记以避免轻微电击。在行为上,参与者表现出很大的个体差异。引人注目的是,在积极应对试验期间,杏仁核 - mPFC和尾状核 - mPFC耦合与参与者最终的积极应对表现相关。这些发现表明,mPFC子区域之间以及杏仁核和尾状核之间的同步预测了个体在训练结束时是否会实现成功的积极应对表现。因此,面对威胁时适应性行动的成功执行需要由mPFC、纹状体和杏仁核组成的神经回路的功能同步。这些组件之间串扰的故障可能是焦虑症状的基础,并损害个体在压力下积极应对的能力。这为恐惧和焦虑症的治疗靶点开辟了一系列可能性。