Lydon Sinéad, Healy Olive, Reed Phil, Mulhern Teresa, Hughes Brian M, Goodwin Matthew S
a School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin , Dublin , Ireland.
b Department of Psychology , Swansea University , Swansea , UK.
Dev Neurorehabil. 2016 Dec;19(6):335-355. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2014.971975. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
The prevalence of abnormal behavioural responses to a variety of stimuli among individuals with autism has led researchers to examine whether physiological reactivity (PR) is typical in this population. This article reviewed studies assessing PR to sensory, social and emotional, and stressor stimuli in individuals with autism.
Systematic searches of electronic databases identified 57 studies that met our inclusion criteria. Studies were analysed to determine: (a) participant characteristics; (b) physiological measures used; (c) PR to sensory, social and emotional or stressor stimuli; (d) the relation between PR and behavioural or psychological variables and (e) baseline physiological activity. A novel measure of methodological quality suitable for use with non-randomized, non-interventional, psychophysiological studies was also developed and applied.
Individuals with autism were found to respond differently than typically developing controls in 78.6%, 66.7% and 71.4% of sensory, social and emotional, and stressor stimulus classes, respectively. However, this extant literature is characterized by variable and inconsistent findings, which do not appear to be accounted for by varying methodological quality, making it difficult to determine what specific factors differentiate individuals with autism who present with atypical PR from those who do not.
Despite this uncertainty, individual differences in PR are clearly present in autism, suggesting additional research is needed to determine the variables relating to PR among those with ASD and to examine the possible existence of physiological subtype responders in the population.
自闭症个体对各种刺激存在异常行为反应,这促使研究人员探究该群体的生理反应性(PR)是否正常。本文综述了评估自闭症个体对感觉、社交与情感以及应激源刺激的PR的研究。
通过对电子数据库进行系统检索,确定了57项符合纳入标准的研究。对这些研究进行分析以确定:(a)参与者特征;(b)所使用的生理测量方法;(c)对感觉、社交与情感或应激源刺激的PR;(d)PR与行为或心理变量之间的关系;以及(e)基线生理活动。还开发并应用了一种适用于非随机、非干预性心理生理学研究的方法学质量新测量方法。
分别在78.6%、66.7%和71.4%的感觉、社交与情感以及应激源刺激类别中发现,自闭症个体与发育正常的对照组反应不同。然而,现有文献的特点是研究结果多变且不一致,似乎无法用方法学质量的差异来解释,这使得难以确定哪些特定因素能区分表现出非典型PR的自闭症个体与未表现出非典型PR的个体。
尽管存在这种不确定性,但自闭症个体在PR方面显然存在个体差异,这表明需要进一步研究以确定与自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者PR相关的变量,并研究该群体中可能存在的生理亚型反应者。