• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

循证病理学:以系统文献综述作为指南和最佳实践的基础。

Evidence-based pathology: systematic literature reviews as the basis for guidelines and best practices.

作者信息

Marchevsky Alberto M, Wick Mark R

机构信息

From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (Dr Marchevsky);

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015 Mar;139(3):394-9. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0106-RA. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

DOI:10.5858/arpa.2014-0106-RA
PMID:25356986
Abstract

CONTEXT

Evidence-based medicine has been proposed as a new paradigm for the identification and evaluation of medical information. Best available evidence or data are identified and used as the basis for the diagnosis and treatment of individual patients. Evidence-based pathology has adapted basic evidence-based medicine concepts to the specific needs of pathology and laboratory medicine.

OBJECTIVES

To briefly review the history and basic concepts of evidence-based medicine and evidence-based pathology, describe how to perform and interpret systematic reviews, and discuss how to integrate best evidence into guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed (National Library of Medicine, Washington, DC) and Web of Science (Thompson Reuters, New York, New York) were used.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based pathology provides methodology to evaluate the quality of information published in pathology journals and apply it to the diagnosis of tissue samples and other tests from individual patients. Information is gathered through the use of systematic reviews, using a method that is less biased and more comprehensive than ad hoc literature searches. Published data are classified into evidence levels to provide readers with a quick impression about the quality and probable clinical validity of available information. Best available evidence is combined with personal experience for the formulation of evidence-based, rather than opinion-based, guidelines that address specific practice needs.

摘要

背景

循证医学已被提议作为识别和评估医学信息的新范式。最佳可得证据或数据被识别出来,并用作个体患者诊断和治疗的基础。循证病理学已将循证医学的基本概念应用于病理学和检验医学的特定需求。

目的

简要回顾循证医学和循证病理学的历史及基本概念,描述如何进行和解释系统评价,并讨论如何将最佳证据整合到指南中。

数据来源

使用了美国国立医学图书馆(华盛顿特区)的PubMed和汤森路透(纽约)的Web of Science。

结论

循证病理学提供了评估发表在病理学杂志上的信息质量并将其应用于个体患者组织样本诊断及其他检测的方法。信息通过系统评价来收集,该方法比临时文献检索的偏差更小且更全面。已发表的数据被分类为证据级别,以便为读者提供有关现有信息质量和可能的临床有效性的快速印象。最佳可得证据与个人经验相结合,以制定基于证据而非基于意见的指南,满足特定的实践需求。

相似文献

1
Evidence-based pathology: systematic literature reviews as the basis for guidelines and best practices.循证病理学:以系统文献综述作为指南和最佳实践的基础。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015 Mar;139(3):394-9. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0106-RA. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
2
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.介入性疼痛管理中的循证医学、系统评价和指南,第一部分:引言与一般考虑因素
Pain Physician. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):161-86.
3
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第6部分。观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.
4
An introduction to an evidence-based approach to interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain.慢性脊柱疼痛管理中基于证据的介入技术方法介绍。
Pain Physician. 2009 Jul-Aug;12(4):E1-33.
5
[The systematic review is the foundation of evidence based medicine. One of the most important contributions to clinical medicine of the past decade].系统评价是循证医学的基础。它是过去十年对临床医学最重要的贡献之一。
Lakartidningen. 2000 May 31;97(22):2726-8.
6
[Evidence-based medicine. How to use biomedical literature to solve clinical problems. Italian Group on Evidence-Based Medicine-GIMBE].[循证医学。如何利用生物医学文献解决临床问题。意大利循证医学小组 - GIMBE]
Minerva Med. 1998 Apr;89(4):105-15.
7
Evidence-based medicine in pathology: an introduction.病理学中的循证医学:引言
Semin Diagn Pathol. 2005 May;22(2):105-15. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2006.01.002.
8
Systematic reviews of evidence in medical education and clinical medicine: is the nature of evidence similar?医学教育和临床医学中证据的系统评价:证据的本质是否相似?
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):474-82. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.682186.
9
Evidence-based dental care--a concept review.循证牙科护理——概念综述
Pediatr Dent. 1998 Nov-Dec;20(7):418-21.
10
Evidence-based medicine.循证医学
Optometry. 2000 Aug;71(8):490-500.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning computational tools to assist the performance of systematic reviews: A mapping review.机器学习计算工具辅助系统评价的实施:一项映射综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Dec 16;22(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01805-4.
2
Amputation for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Meta-Analysis and Validation of a Histopathology Scoring System.复杂性区域疼痛综合征的截肢:组织病理学评分系统的荟萃分析和验证。
Pain Med. 2023 Apr 3;24(4):425-441. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac168.
3
The International Collaboration for Cancer Classification and Research.
国际癌症分类与研究协作组织。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Feb 1;148(3):560-571. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33260. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
4
Localized malignant mesothelioma, an unusual and poorly characterized neoplasm of serosal origin: best current evidence from the literature and the International Mesothelioma Panel.局限性恶性间皮瘤,一种罕见且特征不佳的浆膜起源的肿瘤:来自文献和国际间皮瘤专家组的最新最佳证据。
Mod Pathol. 2020 Feb;33(2):281-296. doi: 10.1038/s41379-019-0352-3. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
5
The performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other CRC screening tests: A meta-analysis.SEPT9 基因甲基化检测的性能及其与其他 CRC 筛查试验的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 8;7(1):3032. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03321-8.