• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康数字素养:接受透析治疗的非裔美国患者对健康管理中数字运用的看法。

Health numeracy: perspectives about using numbers in health management from African American patients receiving dialysis.

作者信息

Wright Nunes Julie A, Osborn Chandra Y, Ikizler T Alp, Cavanaugh Kerri L

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Hemodial Int. 2015 Apr;19(2):287-95. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12239. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1111/hdi.12239
PMID:25358522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4489845/
Abstract

Health numeracy is linked to important clinical outcomes. Kidney disease management relies heavily on patient numeracy skills across the continuum of kidney disease care. Little data are available eliciting stakeholder perspectives from patients receiving dialysis about the construct of health numeracy. Using focus groups, we asked patients receiving hemodialysis open-ended questions to identify facilitators and barriers to their understanding, interpretation, and application of numeric information in kidney care. Transcripts were analyzed using content analysis. Twelve patients participated with a mean (standard deviation) age of 56 (12) years. All were African American, 50% were women, and 83% had an annual income <$20,000/year. Although patients felt numbers were critical to every aspect in life, they noted several barriers to understanding, interpreting and applying quantitative information specifically to manage their health. Low patient self-efficacy related to health numeracy and limited patient-provider communication about quantitatively based feedback, were emphasized as key barriers. Through focus groups of key patient stakeholders we identified important modifiable barriers to effective kidney care. Additional research is needed to develop tools that support numeracy-sensitive education and communication interventions in dialysis.

摘要

健康数字素养与重要的临床结果相关。在整个肾脏疾病护理过程中,肾脏疾病管理严重依赖患者的数字素养技能。关于健康数字素养这一概念,从接受透析治疗的患者那里获取利益相关者观点的数据很少。通过焦点小组,我们向接受血液透析的患者提出开放式问题,以确定在肾脏护理中他们理解、解读和应用数字信息的促进因素和障碍。使用内容分析法对访谈记录进行分析。12名患者参与其中,平均(标准差)年龄为56(12)岁。所有患者均为非裔美国人,50%为女性,83%的年收入低于20,000美元/年。尽管患者认为数字对生活的方方面面都至关重要,但他们指出在理解、解读和应用定量信息以管理自身健康方面存在一些障碍。强调了与健康数字素养相关的患者自我效能低下以及患者与医护人员之间关于基于定量的反馈的沟通有限,是关键障碍。通过关键患者利益相关者的焦点小组,我们确定了有效肾脏护理中重要的可改变障碍。需要进一步开展研究来开发支持透析中数字素养敏感教育和沟通干预的工具。

相似文献

1
Health numeracy: perspectives about using numbers in health management from African American patients receiving dialysis.健康数字素养:接受透析治疗的非裔美国患者对健康管理中数字运用的看法。
Hemodial Int. 2015 Apr;19(2):287-95. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12239. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
2
Numeracy skills in CKD: correlates and outcomes.慢性肾脏病患者的计算能力:相关因素和结局。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Sep;5(9):1566-73. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08121109. Epub 2010 May 27.
3
A Qualitative Study on Health Numeracy and Patient-Provider Communication of Laboratory Numbers in Older African Americans with HIV.一项关于老年非裔美国艾滋病毒感染者的健康数字素养及实验室检查结果医患沟通的定性研究
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2016 Nov-Dec;27(6):826-834. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
4
Do patient preferences for health information vary by health literacy or numeracy? A qualitative assessment.患者对健康信息的偏好是否因健康素养或计算能力而异?一项定性评估。
J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3:109-21. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.712616.
5
Health literacy interventions and outcomes: an updated systematic review.健康素养干预措施与结果:一项更新的系统评价。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011 Mar(199):1-941.
6
Health literacy, numeracy, and graphical literacy among veterans in primary care and their effect on shared decision making and trust in physicians.基层医疗中的退伍军人健康素养、计算素养和图形素养及其对共同决策和对医生信任的影响。
J Health Commun. 2013;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):273-89. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.829137.
7
The association of health literacy with adherence and outcomes in moderate-severe asthma.健康素养与中重度哮喘的依从性和结局的关系。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Aug;132(2):321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.02.014. Epub 2013 Apr 13.
8
Despite high objective numeracy, lower numeric confidence relates to worse financial and medical outcomes.尽管客观的计算能力很高,但较低的数值信心与更糟糕的财务和医疗结果相关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Sep 24;116(39):19386-19391. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903126116. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
Low health numeracy is associated with higher disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus.健康素养低与红斑狼疮患者的更高疾病活动度相关。
Lupus. 2021 Mar;30(3):489-494. doi: 10.1177/0961203320979044. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
10
A health care navigation tool assesses asthma self-management and health literacy.一种医疗保健导航工具可评估哮喘自我管理和健康素养。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Dec;138(6):1593-1599.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.08.043. Epub 2016 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Hemodialysis Access Choice: Impact of Health Literacy.血液透析通路的选择:健康素养的影响。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2017 Sep 6;1(3):e136-e144. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20170711-01. eCollection 2017 Jul.
2
Assessment of literacy and numeracy skills related to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug labels.与非甾体抗炎药标签相关的读写和计算技能评估。
SAGE Open Med. 2019 Mar 7;7:2050312119834119. doi: 10.1177/2050312119834119. eCollection 2019.
3
Antihypertensive medications and risk of death and hospitalizations in US hemodialysis patients: Evidence from a cohort study to inform hypertension treatment practices.美国血液透析患者的降压药物与死亡及住院风险:一项队列研究的证据以指导高血压治疗实践
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(5):e5924. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005924.
4
Strategies to promote adherence to nutritional advice in patients with chronic kidney disease: a narrative review and commentary.促进慢性肾病患者遵循营养建议的策略:一项叙述性综述与评论
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2016 Feb 2;9:21-33. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S76831. eCollection 2016.
5
Educating Patients about CKD: The Path to Self-Management and Patient-Centered Care.向患者宣传慢性肾脏病:自我管理和以患者为中心的医疗之路。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Apr 7;11(4):694-703. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07680715. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
6
Disparities in Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Use in Nephrology Clinics.肾脏病诊所电子健康记录患者门户使用情况的差异
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Nov 6;10(11):2013-22. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01640215. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Blocks, ovals, or people? Icon type affects risk perceptions and recall of pictographs.方块、椭圆还是人物?图标类型会影响风险认知和象形图的记忆。
Med Decis Making. 2014 May;34(4):443-53. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13511706. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
2
Health numeracy: the importance of domain in assessing numeracy.健康数字素养:领域在评估数字素养中的重要性。
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jan;34(1):107-15. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13493144. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
3
Multiple behavior changes in diet and activity: a randomized controlled trial using mobile technology.饮食和活动方面的多种行为改变:一项使用移动技术的随机对照试验
Arch Intern Med. 2012 May 28;172(10):789-96. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1044.
4
HIV prevention and care in the digital age.数字时代的艾滋病预防与关怀。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Dec;55 Suppl 2:S94-7. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181fcb878.
5
Social disparities in internet patient portal use in diabetes: evidence that the digital divide extends beyond access.糖尿病患者互联网就诊入口使用的社会差异:数字鸿沟不仅体现在可及性上。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 May 1;18(3):318-21. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.006015. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
6
Bridging the Digital Divide for urban seniors: community partnership.弥合城市老年人的数字鸿沟:社区伙伴关系。
Geriatr Nurs. 2010 Nov-Dec;31(6):455-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2010.10.006.
7
Health coaching to improve healthy lifestyle behaviors: an integrative review.健康教练改善健康生活方式行为:综合评价。
Am J Health Promot. 2010 Sep-Oct;25(1):e1-e12. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.090313-LIT-101.
8
Numeracy skills in CKD: correlates and outcomes.慢性肾脏病患者的计算能力:相关因素和结局。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Sep;5(9):1566-73. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08121109. Epub 2010 May 27.
9
Literacy, numeracy, and portion-size estimation skills.读写能力、计算能力和食物分量估算技能。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Apr;36(4):324-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.11.012.
10
Numeracy and communication with patients: they are counting on us.算术能力与和患者的沟通:他们信赖我们。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Dec;23(12):2117-24. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0803-x. Epub 2008 Oct 2.