• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Health numeracy: the importance of domain in assessing numeracy.健康数字素养:领域在评估数字素养中的重要性。
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jan;34(1):107-15. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13493144. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
2
Understanding Health Risk Comprehension: The Role of Math Anxiety, Subjective Numeracy, and Objective Numeracy.理解健康风险认知:数学焦虑、主观数感和客观数感的作用。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Feb;40(2):222-234. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20904725. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
3
ABCs or 123s? The independent contributions of literacy and numeracy skills on health task performance among older adults.字母表还是数字?读写能力和计算能力对老年人健康任务表现的独立贡献。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Aug;98(8):991-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
4
Assessing health numeracy among community-dwelling older adults.评估社区居住老年人的健康数字素养。
J Health Commun. 2007 Oct-Nov;12(7):651-65. doi: 10.1080/10810730701619919.
5
Assessing numerical reasoning provides insight into financial literacy.评估数值推理能力可深入了解金融知识素养。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Jul-Aug;29(4):710-717. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1805745. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
6
Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale.无需数学测试来衡量数字能力:主观数字能力量表的编制
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):672-80. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07304449. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
7
Can I Count on Getting Better? Association between Math Anxiety and Poorer Understanding of Medical Risk Reductions.我能指望病情好转吗?数学焦虑与对医疗风险降低的理解较差之间的关联。
Med Decis Making. 2016 Oct;36(7):876-86. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15602000. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
8
Despite high objective numeracy, lower numeric confidence relates to worse financial and medical outcomes.尽管客观的计算能力很高,但较低的数值信心与更糟糕的财务和医疗结果相关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Sep 24;116(39):19386-19391. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903126116. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
Health literacy and numeracy: key factors in cancer risk comprehension.健康素养与数字能力:癌症风险理解中的关键因素。
Chronic Dis Can. 2008;29(1):1-8.
10
Examining the Interrelations Among Objective and Subjective Health Literacy and Numeracy and Their Associations with Health Knowledge.考察客观健康素养、主观健康素养和数学素养之间的相互关系及其与健康知识的关联。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Nov;33(11):1945-1953. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4624-2. Epub 2018 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Empowering mothers: Advancing maternal health literacy and numeracy through the introduction of Maternal and Child Health Calendar.赋权母亲:通过引入母婴健康日历提高孕产妇健康素养和数算能力。
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241291725. doi: 10.1177/17455057241291725.
2
Basic Symbolic Number Skills, but Not Formal Mathematics Performance, Longitudinally Predict Mathematics Anxiety in the First Years of Primary School.基本的符号数字技能,而非形式数学成绩,能纵向预测小学低年级阶段的数学焦虑。
J Intell. 2023 Nov 1;11(11):211. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11110211.
3
The Modest Effects of Fact Boxes on Cancer Screening.信息框对癌症筛查的轻微影响。
J Risk Uncertain. 2021 Feb;62(1):29-54. doi: 10.1007/s11166-021-09344-x. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
4
Understanding Health Risk Comprehension: The Role of Math Anxiety, Subjective Numeracy, and Objective Numeracy.理解健康风险认知:数学焦虑、主观数感和客观数感的作用。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Feb;40(2):222-234. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20904725. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
5
Assessing the Demand for Micropensions among India's Poor.评估印度贫困人口对小额养老金的需求。
J Econ Ageing. 2017 Jun;9:30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
6
Risk Prediction in Clinical Practice: A Practical Guide for Cardiothoracic Surgeons.临床实践中的风险预测:心胸外科医生实用指南
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Nov;108(5):1573-1582. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.04.126. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
7
Assessment of literacy and numeracy skills related to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug labels.与非甾体抗炎药标签相关的读写和计算技能评估。
SAGE Open Med. 2019 Mar 7;7:2050312119834119. doi: 10.1177/2050312119834119. eCollection 2019.
8
Examining Associations between Health Information Seeking Behavior and Adult Education Status in the U.S.: An Analysis of the 2012 PIAAC Data.审视美国健康信息寻求行为与成人教育状况之间的关联:对2012年国际成人能力评估项目(PIAAC)数据的分析
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 16;11(2):e0148751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148751. eCollection 2016.
9
Impact of a web-based treatment decision aid for early-stage prostate cancer on shared decision-making and health outcomes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于网络的早期前列腺癌治疗决策辅助工具对共同决策和健康结局的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 May 27;16:231. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0750-x.
10
Should Health Numeracy Be Assessed Objectively or Subjectively?健康数字素养应进行客观评估还是主观评估?
Med Decis Making. 2016 Oct;36(7):868-75. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15584332. Epub 2015 May 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Proxy interviews and bias in the distribution of cognitive abilities due to non-response in longitudinal studies: a comparison of HRS and ELSA.代理访谈以及纵向研究中因无应答导致的认知能力分布偏差:健康与退休研究(HRS)和英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)的比较
Longit Life Course Stud. 2011 May;2(2):170-184. doi: 10.14301/llcs.v2i2.116.
2
A comparison of response rates in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing and the Health and Retirement Study.英国老龄化纵向研究与健康与退休研究中的反应率比较。
Longit Life Course Stud. 2011 May 1;2(2):127-144. doi: 10.14301/llcs.v2i2.118.
3
Interaction terms in nonlinear models.非线性模型中的交互项。
Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb;47(1 Pt 1):255-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01314.x. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
4
Patient numeracy, perceptions of provider communication, and colorectal cancer screening utilization.患者的计算能力、对提供者沟通的看法与结直肠癌筛查的利用。
J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):157-68. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.522699.
5
Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care.为何国家需要推动以患者为中心的医疗保健政策。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Aug;29(8):1489-95. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0888.
6
How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.计算能力如何影响风险理解和医疗决策。
Psychol Bull. 2009 Nov;135(6):943-73. doi: 10.1037/a0017327.
7
Clinical implications of numeracy: theory and practice.数字素养的临床意义:理论与实践。
Ann Behav Med. 2008 Jun;35(3):261-74. doi: 10.1007/s12160-008-9037-8. Epub 2008 Aug 2.
8
Association of numeracy and diabetes control.算术能力与糖尿病控制的关联。
Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 20;148(10):737-46. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-10-200805200-00006.
9
Development and validation of the Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT).糖尿病算术测试(DNT)的开发与验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 May 1;8:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-96.
10
Rethinking health numeracy: a multidisciplinary literature review.重新思考健康数字素养:一项多学科文献综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):713-21. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2464. Epub 2007 Aug 21.

健康数字素养:领域在评估数字素养中的重要性。

Health numeracy: the importance of domain in assessing numeracy.

作者信息

Levy Helen, Ubel Peter A, Dillard Amanda J, Weir David R, Fagerlin Angela

机构信息

Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (HL, DRW).

School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (HL)

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2014 Jan;34(1):107-15. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13493144. Epub 2013 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X13493144
PMID:23824401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4106034/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Existing research concludes that measures of general numeracy can be used to predict individuals' ability to assess health risks. We posit that the domain in which questions are posed affects the ability to perform mathematical tasks, raising the possibility of a separate construct of "health numeracy" that is distinct from general numeracy. The objective was to determine whether older adults' ability to perform simple math depends on domain.

METHODS

Community-based participants completed 4 math questions posed in 3 different domains: a health domain, a financial domain, and a pure math domain. Participants were 962 individuals aged 55 and older, representative of the community-dwelling US population over age 54.

RESULTS

We found that respondents performed significantly worse when questions were posed in the health domain (54% correct) than in either the pure math domain (66% correct) or the financial domain (63% correct). Our experimental measure of numeracy consisted of only 4 questions, and it is possible that the apparent effect of domain is specific to the mathematical tasks that these questions require.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that health numeracy is strongly related to general numeracy but that the 2 constructs may not be the same. Further research is needed into how different aspects of general numeracy and health numeracy translate into actual medical decisions.

摘要

背景与目的

现有研究得出结论,一般算术能力的测量方法可用于预测个体评估健康风险的能力。我们认为,提出问题的领域会影响执行数学任务的能力,这就引发了一种与一般算术能力不同的“健康算术能力”单独结构存在的可能性。目的是确定老年人执行简单数学运算的能力是否取决于领域。

方法

以社区为基础的参与者完成了在3个不同领域提出的4道数学题:健康领域、金融领域和纯数学领域。参与者为962名55岁及以上的个体,代表了美国54岁以上的社区居住人口。

结果

我们发现,当问题在健康领域提出时,受访者的表现(正确率54%)明显低于纯数学领域(正确率66%)或金融领域(正确率63%)。我们的算术能力实验测量仅由4道题组成,领域的明显影响可能特定于这些问题所需的数学任务。

结论

这些结果表明,健康算术能力与一般算术能力密切相关,但这两种结构可能不同。需要进一步研究一般算术能力和健康算术能力的不同方面如何转化为实际医疗决策。