Powell-Jackson Timothy, Macleod David, Benova Lenka, Lynch Caroline, Campbell Oona M R
Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Feb;20(2):230-9. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12414. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
To examine the role of the private sector in the provision of antenatal care (ANC) across low- and middle-income countries.
Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from 46 countries (representing 2.6 billion people) on components of ANC given to 303 908 women aged 15-49 years for most recent birth were used. We identified 79 unique sources of care which were re-coded into home, public, private (commercial) and private (not-for-profit). Use of ANC and a quality of care index (scaled 0-1) were stratified by type of provider, region and wealth quintile. Linear regressions were used to examine the association between provider type and antenatal quality of care score.
Across all countries, the main source of ANC was public (54%), followed by private commercial (36%) and home (5%), but there were large variations by region. Home-based ANC was associated with worse quality of care (0.2; 95% CI -0.2 to -0.19) relative to the public sector, while the private not-for-profit sector (0.03; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.04) was better. There were no differences in quality of care between public and private commercial providers.
The market for ANC varies considerably between regions. The two largest sectors - public and private commercial - perform similarly in terms of quality of care. Future research should examine the role of the private sector in other health service domains across multiple countries and test what policies and programmes can encourage private providers to contribute to increased coverage, quality and equity of maternal care.
探讨低收入和中等收入国家私营部门在提供产前保健(ANC)方面的作用。
使用来自46个国家(代表26亿人口)的人口与健康调查(DHS)数据,这些数据涉及为最近一次分娩的303908名15 - 49岁妇女提供的ANC组成部分。我们确定了79个独特的护理来源,并将其重新编码为家庭、公共、私营(商业)和私营(非营利)。ANC的使用情况和护理质量指数(范围为0 - 1)按提供者类型、地区和财富五分位数进行分层。采用线性回归分析来研究提供者类型与产前护理质量得分之间的关联。
在所有国家中,ANC的主要来源是公共部门(54%),其次是私营商业部门(36%)和家庭(5%),但地区差异很大。相对于公共部门,家庭式ANC的护理质量较差(0.2;95%置信区间 - 0.2至 - 0.19),而私营非营利部门的护理质量较好(0.03;95%置信区间0.02至0.04)。公共和私营商业提供者之间的护理质量没有差异。
ANC市场在不同地区差异很大。两个最大的部门——公共部门和私营商业部门——在护理质量方面表现相似。未来的研究应考察私营部门在多个国家其他卫生服务领域中的作用,并测试哪些政策和项目能够鼓励私营提供者为提高孕产妇护理的覆盖率、质量和公平性做出贡献。