Wittmann Daniela, Carolan Marsha, Given Barbara, Skolarus Ted A, Crossley Heather, An Lawrence, Palapattu Ganesh, Clark Patricia, Montie James E
Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Social Work, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Sex Med. 2015 Feb;12(2):494-504. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12732. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
Interventions designed to help couples recover sexual intimacy after prostatectomy have not been guided by a comprehensive conceptual model.
We examined a proposed biopsychosocial conceptual model of couples' sexual recovery that included functional, psychological, and relational aspects of sexuality, surgery-related sexual losses, and grief and mourning as recovery process.
We interviewed 20 couples preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. between 2010 and 2012. Interviews were analyzed with Analytic Induction qualitative methodology, using NVivo software. Paired t-tests described functional assessment data. Study findings led to a revised conceptual model.
Couples' experiences were assessed through semi-structured interviews; male participants' sexual function was assessed with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite and female participants' sexual function with the Female Sexual Function Index.
Preoperatively, 30% of men had erectile dysfunction (ED) and 84% of partners were postmenopausal. All valued sexual recovery, but worried about cancer spread and surgery side effects. Faith in themselves and their surgeons led 90% of couples to overestimate erectile recovery. Postoperatively, most men had ED and lost confidence. Couples' sexual activity decreased. Couples reported feeling loss and grief: cancer diagnosis was the first loss, followed by surgery-related sexual losses. Couples' engagement in intentional sex, patients' acceptance of erectile aids, and partners' interest in sex aided the recovery of couples' sexual intimacy recovery. Unselfconscious sex, not returning to erectile function baseline, was seen as the end point. Survey findings documented participants' sexual function losses, confirming qualitative findings.
Couples' sexual recovery requires addressing sexual function, feelings about losses, and relationship simultaneously. Perioperative education should emphasize the roles of nerve damage in ED and grief and mourning in sexual recovery.
旨在帮助前列腺切除术后夫妻恢复性亲密关系的干预措施,尚未以全面的概念模型为指导。
我们研究了一个提出的关于夫妻性恢复的生物心理社会概念模型,该模型包括性功能、心理和性方面的关系、与手术相关的性损失,以及作为恢复过程的悲伤和哀悼。
在2010年至2012年期间,我们对20对夫妻进行了术前和术后3个月的访谈。使用NVivo软件,采用分析归纳定性方法对访谈进行分析。配对t检验描述功能评估数据。研究结果促成了一个修订后的概念模型。
通过半结构化访谈评估夫妻的经历;用扩展前列腺癌指数综合量表评估男性参与者的性功能,用女性性功能指数评估女性参与者的性功能。
术前,30%的男性有勃起功能障碍(ED),84%的伴侣已绝经。所有人都重视性恢复,但担心癌症扩散和手术副作用。对自己和外科医生的信任使90%的夫妻高估了勃起恢复情况。术后,大多数男性患有ED并失去信心。夫妻的性活动减少。夫妻报告感到失落和悲伤:癌症诊断是第一次失落,其次是与手术相关的性损失。夫妻有意进行性行为、患者接受勃起辅助器具以及伴侣对性的兴趣有助于夫妻性亲密关系的恢复。自然的性行为,而非恢复到勃起功能基线,被视为终点。调查结果记录了参与者的性功能损失,证实了定性研究结果。
夫妻的性恢复需要同时解决性功能、对损失的感受和关系问题。围手术期教育应强调神经损伤在ED中的作用以及悲伤和哀悼在性恢复中的作用。