• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机转换试验:茚达特罗对比沙美特罗/氟替卡松治疗中重度 COPD

INSTEAD: a randomised switch trial of indacaterol versus salmeterol/fluticasone in moderate COPD.

机构信息

Pulmonary Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 2014 Dec;44(6):1548-56. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00126814. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1183/09031936.00126814
PMID:25359348
Abstract

The Indacaterol: Switching Non-exacerbating Patients with Moderate COPD From Salmeterol/Fluticasone to Indacaterol (INSTEAD) study investigated the effect of switching patients at low risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations from salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC; inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) regimen) to indacaterol monotherapy (non-ICS regimen). This 26-week, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, phase IV study, randomised 581 patients with moderate COPD to indacaterol 150 μg once daily or SFC 50/500 μg twice daily. Patients had been receiving SFC 50/500 μg for ≥3 months, with no COPD exacerbations for more than a year before the study (patients for whom ICS is not recommended). The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of indacaterol to SFC, measured by trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) after 12 weeks (non-inferiority margin of 0.06 L). The primary objective was met, with a mean treatment difference of 9 mL (95% CI -45-26 mL). There were no significant differences between treatments in terms of breathlessness (transition dyspnoea index) or health status (Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire) at weeks 12 or 26, or rescue medication use or COPD exacerbation rates over 26 weeks. Safety profiles of both treatments were as expected. This study demonstrated that patients with moderate COPD and no exacerbations in the previous year can be switched from SFC to indacaterol 150 μg with no efficacy loss.

摘要

吲达特罗

将患有中度 COPD 且无 COPD 加重史的患者由沙美特罗/氟替卡松转换为吲达特罗(INSTEAD)研究旨在评估将处于低风险 COPD 加重的患者由沙美特罗/氟替卡松(SFC;吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)方案)转换为单药吲达特罗(非 ICS 方案)的效果。这项为期 26 周、双盲、双模拟、平行分组、四期研究,将 581 例中度 COPD 患者随机分为每日一次 150μg 吲达特罗组或每日两次 50/500μg SFC 组。这些患者之前已经接受 SFC 50/500μg 治疗≥3 个月,且在研究前一年以上无 COPD 加重史(不推荐使用 ICS)。主要目标是通过第 12 周时的谷值用力呼气量 1 秒率(FEV₁)来证明吲达特罗不劣于 SFC(非劣效性边界为 0.06L)。主要目标达到,治疗差异的平均值为 9mL(95%CI-45-26mL)。在第 12 周和第 26 周时,两种治疗方案在呼吸困难(过渡性呼吸困难指数)或健康状况(圣乔治呼吸问卷)方面没有显著差异,26 周期间的抢救药物使用或 COPD 加重率也没有差异。两种治疗方案的安全性特征均与预期一致。这项研究表明,过去一年无加重史的中度 COPD 患者可由 SFC 转换为吲达特罗 150μg,而不会导致疗效损失。

相似文献

1
INSTEAD: a randomised switch trial of indacaterol versus salmeterol/fluticasone in moderate COPD.随机转换试验:茚达特罗对比沙美特罗/氟替卡松治疗中重度 COPD
Eur Respir J. 2014 Dec;44(6):1548-56. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00126814. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
2
Efficacy and safety of once-daily QVA149 compared with twice-daily salmeterol-fluticasone in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ILLUMINATE): a randomised, double-blind, parallel group study.每日一次 QVA149 与每日两次沙美特罗/氟替卡松治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(ILLUMINATE)的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机、双盲、平行分组研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2013 Mar;1(1):51-60. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(12)70052-8. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
3
LANTERN: a randomized study of QVA149 versus salmeterol/fluticasone combination in patients with COPD.灯笼研究:一项关于QVA149与沙美特罗/氟替卡松联合用药治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的随机研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Jun 5;10:1015-26. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S84436. eCollection 2015.
4
Effects of long-acting bronchodilators in COPD patients according to COPD severity and ICS use.长效支气管扩张剂在 COPD 患者中的作用,根据 COPD 严重程度和 ICS 使用情况。
Respir Med. 2013 Feb;107(2):223-32. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.10.022. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) Versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Chinese Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The Chinese Cohort from the LANTERN Study.茚达特罗/格隆溴铵(IND/GLY)与沙美特罗/氟替卡松在中国中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的疗效和安全性:来自LATTERN研究的中国队列
COPD. 2016 Dec;13(6):686-692. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2016.1182970. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
6
Efficacy and tolerability of indacaterol 75 μg once daily in patients aged ≥40 years with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled 12-week studies.每天一次 75μg 吲达特罗治疗年龄≥40 岁慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效和耐受性:两项双盲、安慰剂对照 12 周研究的结果。
Clin Ther. 2011 Dec;33(12):1974-84. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.11.009.
7
Efficacy and safety of the direct switch to indacaterol/glycopyrronium from salmeterol/fluticasone in non-frequently exacerbating COPD patients: The FLASH randomized controlled trial.在非频繁加重 COPD 患者中,从沙美特罗/氟替卡松直接转换为茚达特罗/格隆溴铵的疗效和安全性:FLASH 随机对照试验。
Respirology. 2018 Dec;23(12):1152-1159. doi: 10.1111/resp.13374. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
8
Cost-effectiveness of the LABA/LAMA dual bronchodilator indacaterol/glycopyrronium in a Swedish healthcare setting.长效β2受体激动剂/长效毒蕈碱受体拮抗剂双支气管扩张剂茚达特罗/格隆溴铵在瑞典医疗环境中的成本效益。
Respir Med. 2014 Dec;108(12):1786-93. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
9
Once-daily indacaterol versus twice-daily salmeterol for COPD: a placebo-controlled comparison.每日一次茚达特罗与每日两次沙美特罗治疗 COPD:一项安慰剂对照比较。
Eur Respir J. 2011 Feb;37(2):273-9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00045810. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
10
Once-daily indacaterol versus tiotropium for patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (INVIGORATE): a randomised, blinded, parallel-group study.每日一次茚达特罗与噻托溴铵治疗重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者(INVIGORATE):一项随机、双盲、平行分组研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2013 Sep;1(7):524-33. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70158-9. Epub 2013 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids from Patients with COPD; Effect on Exacerbation Frequency and Lung Function: A Systematic Review.COPD 患者停用吸入性皮质类固醇;对加重频率和肺功能的影响:系统评价。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Jun 21;19:1403-1419. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S436525. eCollection 2024.
2
Discontinuation Schedule of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入性糖皮质激素的停用方案
Fed Pract. 2023 Dec;40(12):398-403. doi: 10.12788/fp.0442. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
3
LABA/LAMA versus LABA/ICS fixed-dose combinations in the prevention of COPD exacerbations: a modeling analysis of literature aggregate data.
LABA/LAMA 与 LABA/ICS 固定剂量联合制剂在预防 COPD 加重中的作用:文献汇总数据的建模分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Oct;79(10):1321-1332. doi: 10.1007/s00228-023-03543-y. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
4
cAMP-PDE signaling in COPD: Review of cellular, molecular and clinical features.慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的环磷酸腺苷磷酸二酯酶信号传导:细胞、分子及临床特征综述
Biochem Biophys Rep. 2023 Feb 16;34:101438. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2023.101438. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Clinical and Economic Impact of Long-Term Inhaled Corticosteroid Withdrawal in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treated with Triple Therapy in Spain.西班牙接受三联疗法治疗的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者长期停用吸入性皮质类固醇的临床和经济影响。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Sep 7;17:2161-2174. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S367708. eCollection 2022.
6
Pulmonologists' Opinion on the Use of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients in Spain: A Cross-Sectional Survey.西班牙肺科医生对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者使用吸入性皮质类固醇的看法:一项横断面调查。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Jul 12;17:1577-1587. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S369118. eCollection 2022.
7
Efficacy of ICS versus Non-ICS Combination Therapy in COPD: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.ICS 与非 ICS 联合治疗 COPD 的疗效:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 May 5;17:1051-1067. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S347588. eCollection 2022.
8
Discordant diagnostic criteria for pneumonia in COPD trials: a review.COPD 临床试验中肺炎诊断标准不一致:综述
Eur Respir Rev. 2021 Nov 17;30(162). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0124-2021. Print 2021 Dec 31.
9
Inhaled corticosteroids in COPD: Personalising the therapeutic choice.慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的吸入性糖皮质激素:个性化治疗选择
Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr 3;24(1). doi: 10.7196/AJTCCM.2018.v24i1.184. eCollection 2018.
10
Inhaled Corticosteroids and the Pneumonia Risk in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.吸入性糖皮质激素与慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的肺炎风险:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jun 29;12:691621. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.691621. eCollection 2021.