MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre.
Department of Psychology, City University London.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Feb;144(1):48-57. doi: 10.1037/a0038204. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
Categorization decisions that reflect constantly changing memory representations might be an important adaptive response to dynamic environments. We assessed One such influence from memory (i.e., sequence effects) on categorization decisions made by individuals with autism. A model of categorization (i.e., memory and contrast model, Stewart, Brown, & Chater, 2002) assumes that contextual influences in the form of sequence effects drive categorization performance in individuals with typical development. Difficulties with contextual processing in autism, described by the weak central coherence account (Frith, 1989; Frith & Happé, 1994) imply reduced sequence effects for this participant group. The experiment reported in this article tested this implication. High-functioning children and adolescents with autism (ages 10 to 15 years), matched on age and IQ with typically developing children, completed a test that measures sequence effects (i.e., category contrast effect task, Stewart et al., 2002) using auditory tones. Participants also completed a pitch discrimination task to measure any potential confound arising from possible enhanced discrimination sensitivity within the autism spectrum disorder group. The typically developing group alone demonstrated a category contrast effect. The data suggest that this finding cannot be attributed readily to participant group differences in discrimination sensitivity, perseveration, difficulties on the associated binary categorization task, or greater reliance on long-term memory. We discuss the broad methodological implication that comparison between autism spectrum disorder group and control group responses to sequential perceptual stimuli might be confounded by the influence of preceding trials. We also discuss implications for the weak central coherence account and models of typical cognition.
反映不断变化的记忆表征的分类决策可能是对动态环境的一种重要适应反应。我们评估了记忆(即序列效应)对自闭症个体分类决策的影响。一种分类模型(即记忆和对比模型,Stewart、Brown 和 Chater,2002)假设以序列效应形式出现的上下文影响会驱动典型发展个体的分类表现。自闭症的上下文处理困难,即弱中央连贯理论(Frith,1989;Frith 和 Happé,1994)所描述的,意味着该参与者群体的序列效应减少。本文报道的实验测试了这一推论。高功能自闭症儿童和青少年(10 至 15 岁),与典型发育儿童在年龄和智商上相匹配,完成了一项测试,该测试通过听觉音调来衡量序列效应(即类别对比效应任务,Stewart 等人,2002)。参与者还完成了音高辨别任务,以衡量可能由于自闭症谱系障碍群体中增强的辨别敏感性而产生的任何潜在混杂因素。只有典型发育组表现出类别对比效应。数据表明,这一发现不能轻易归因于参与者在辨别敏感性、坚持、与二进制分类任务相关的困难或对长期记忆的更大依赖方面的差异。我们讨论了广泛的方法学意义,即比较自闭症谱系障碍组和对照组对顺序感知刺激的反应可能会受到前一个试验的影响而受到混淆。我们还讨论了对弱中央连贯理论和典型认知模型的影响。