Stewart Neil, Brown Gordon D A, Chater Nick
Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jan;28(1):3-11. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.1.3.
Categorization research typically assumes that the cognitive system has access to a (more or less noisy) representation of the absolute magnitudes of the properties of stimuli and that this information is used in reaching a categorization decision. However, research on identification of simple perceptual stimuli suggests that people have very poor representations of absolute magnitude information and that judgments about absolute magnitude are strongly influenced by preceding material. The experiments presented here investigate such sequence effects in categorization tasks. Strong sequence effects were found. Classification of a borderline stimulus was more accurate when preceded by a distant member of the opposite category than by a distant member of the same category. It is argued that this category contrast effect cannot be accounted for by extant exemplar or decision-bound models of categorization. The effect suggests the use of relative magnitude information in categorization. A memory and contrast model illustrates how relative magnitude information may be used in categorization.
分类研究通常假定认知系统能够获取(或多或少存在噪声的)刺激属性绝对大小的表征,并且在做出分类决策时会使用这些信息。然而,关于简单感知刺激识别的研究表明,人们对绝对大小信息的表征非常差,而且对绝对大小的判断会受到先前材料的强烈影响。此处呈现的实验研究了分类任务中的此类序列效应。发现了强烈的序列效应。当一个临界刺激之前出现的是相反类别的远距离成员时,其分类比之前出现相同类别的远距离成员时更准确。有人认为,这种类别对比效应无法用现有的分类范例或决策边界模型来解释。这种效应表明在分类中使用了相对大小信息。一个记忆与对比模型说明了相对大小信息在分类中可能是如何被使用的。